Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Topics › Quran and tafsir

Segments on this topic per year

Click a year to jump to it

Latest answer · 18 Oct 2025

18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth LatestDoes 'we sent you only as a mercy' (21:107) describe the Prophet or the act of sending him? Mufti Abu Layth says the primary Arabic reading of 21:107 is that the Prophet himself was sent as a mercy for the worlds, with the exclusive negation amplifying that, while the guest's reading that the sending is the mercy is a secondary understanding he may hold but not impose. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 21:107 (we sent you only as a mercy for the worlds)hal (circumstantial state) [?]masdar (verbal noun) machine10 min 54 s32:42on YouTube

Earlier answers · 317 · newest first

2025 · 10

18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth LatestWhat is the 'wisdom' the Prophet teaches alongside the Book in 2:129? The guest holds that the wisdom taught alongside the Book is the Quran's own application and is found in the Quran itself; Mufti Abu Layth says the primary reading of 2:129 is that the messenger teaches the Book and, separately, the wisdom, and himself purifies the people. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 2:129 (send a messenger who teaches them the Book and the Wisdom and purifies them)Quran 2:231 (the Book and the Wisdom with which He admonishes you)hikmah (wisdom) machine5 min 51 s51:35on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth LatestDoes 16:44 mean the Prophet explains the Quran, or that the Quran clarifies earlier scriptures? Mufti Abu Layth reads 16:44 as showing the Prophet's role in explaining the revelation, as nearly every tafsir does; the guest says the verse is about the Quran clarifying earlier scriptures to the people of the book, and points to 5:15 as naming a single source. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 16:44 (we revealed to you the reminder so that you may clarify to people what was revealed to them)Quran 5:15 (there has come to you from Allah a light and a clear book)Harun (Aaron) machine4 min 44 s57:24on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the 'light' that came with the clear book in 5:15 the Prophet or the Quran itself? The guest reads the light of 5:15 as an aspect of the book itself, arguing from the pronoun in 5:16 and the conjunction in 33:7; Mufti Abu Layth presents the view of the mufassirun that the light is the Prophet and accepts the guest's reading as one interpretation while objecting that the others are not negated. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 5:15 (there has come to you from Allah a light and a clear book)Quran 5:16 (by which Allah guides those who follow His pleasure)Quran 33:7 (the covenant from the prophets, from you and from Nuh) machine6 min 48 s1:02:02on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Can 'light' in 5:15 refer to the Prophet, or only to guidance and the book? Mufti Abu Layth says the primary readings of 'light' in 5:15 are guidance or the Prophet, as many mufassirun held, and that the guest's reading as the book is acceptable but may not negate the others; the guest says the word cannot refer to a human and that the mufassirun inserted the Prophet from presupposition. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 5:15 (there has come to you from Allah a light and a clear book)Rashad Khalifatafsir machine9 min 01 s1:08:12on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth LatestDoes the Quran alone say what breaks the fast? The guest says 2:187 shows that eating, drinking and intercourse break the fast by making them lawful at night; Mufti Abu Layth says the verse does not explicitly forbid them by day, so the Quran-only reader is inferring by reason rather than reporting what God said. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 2:187 (lawful for you on the night of the fast; eat and drink until the white thread)sawm (fasting) machine4 min 25 s1:42:01on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Can the Quran be used to call the Prophet the best of creation? The guest says calling the Prophet the best of creation is an unprovable inference contradicted by verses and reports favouring Abraham; Mufti Abu Layth says the guest rejects inference for that title while relying on inference to say what breaks the fast. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Ibrahim (Abraham)report: the best of creation is ibrahim (as cited by the guest)Quran 21:107 (we sent you only as a mercy for the worlds) machine3 min 36 s1:47:07on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does 3:188 mean everyone who likes praise will be punished? The apparent reading of 3:188 threatens anyone who loves praise for what he has not done, which troubled the Companions until the Prophet explained it as concerning tyrants and the arrogant; the guest reads it as a warning listing traits a believer must shed. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 3:188 (those who rejoice in what they have done and love to be praised for what they have not done)report: the companions asked does not each of us love to be praised for what he has not doneQuran 28:76 (Qarun told not to exult) machine6 min 06 s1:58:33on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is it a sin to enjoy being praised? The guest holds that 3:188 describes people buying into the worldly life, exulting in what they have and loving praise for what they have not done, and that such people are punished; pressed, he confirms that anyone with these traits faces punishment. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 3:188 (those who rejoice in what they have done and love to be praised for what they have not done)Quran 30:4 (on that day the believers will rejoice) [?] machine6 min 07 s2:04:39on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why did Mufti Abu Layth bring up 3:188 against the Quran-only position? Mufti Abu Layth cited 3:188 because its apparent reading is harsher than the Prophet's explanation, showing that the reasoning of those who came before is valuable; the guest says he asked for the Prophet's book of explanations and was pointed back to the Quran. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 3:188 (those who rejoice in what they have done and love to be praised for what they have not done)report: the companions asked does not each of us love to be praised for what he has not donetafsir machine4 min 51 s2:14:00on YouTube
18 Oct 2025MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why are two of the daily prayers recited silently when 17:110 says not to be silent? The silent prayers come from the living tradition Malik described, handed down from the Companions' descendants; Mufti Abu Layth reads 17:110 as being about crying out to Allah, neither in despair nor in silence, rather than the five prayers, citing 8:35 where 'prayer' means whistling and clapping. Discussionguest speechBr Muhammad (MFG, MuhammadFromGod channel)Quran 17:110 (be neither loud nor silent in your prayer, but seek a way between)Quran 8:35 (their prayer at the House was only whistling and clapping)Imam Malik machine10 min 12 s2:31:09on YouTube

2024 · 4

29 Sep 2024On Current Events LatestMufti Tariq Masood's remark on scribal errors, and Islam as a deen of mercy Mufti Abu Layth says there are no mistakes in the Quran's script, but Islam is a deen of mercy, so Mufti Tariq Masood's error should not bring calls for his death. Discussionposition checkedMufti Tariq Masoodrasm (the orthography of the mushaf)mushafQuran 21:107 (a mercy to the worlds) machine5 min 09 s0:03on YouTube
29 Sep 2024On Current Events LatestIs someone who says something wrong about the Prophet guilty of blasphemy? Not when there was no such intention: Mufti Abu Layth says Mufti Tariq Masood was clearly wrong, but he meant to praise the Prophet, so calling him a blasphemer is unacceptable. Discussionposition checkedMufti Tariq MasoodAbu al-Walid al-Baji [?]al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi [?]report: the man who lost his camel in the desert said o allah you are my servant and i am your lord machine4 min 34 s5:12on YouTube
29 Sep 2024On Current Events Why is lanasfa'an in Quran 96:15 written with an alif, and is it a mistake? It is not a mistake: Mufti Abu Layth shows from Sibawayh that the emphatic nun becomes an alif when stopping on it, so the alif spelling is the traditional one. Lessonposition checkedQuran 96:15 (lanasfa'an bil-nasiyah)nun al-tawkid (the emphatic nun)Sibawayh [?]al-Kitab of Sibawayh [?] machine6 min 07 s14:51on YouTube
5 Mar 2024Shorts LatestWhich verse of the Quran promises more blessings for being grateful? Mufti Abu Layth points to Quran 14:7: Allah promises abundance to the grateful, so by giving you receive. Lessonposition checkedQuran 14:7 (if you are grateful, I will increase you)shukr (gratitude) machine59 s0:03on YouTube

2022 · 5

19 Aug 2022video LatestWhat are the satanic verses in Islamic history? Mufti Abu Layth explains that the Prophet's recitation of Surah al-Najm and the prostration of everyone present are documented, but that the added story of him praising the three goddesses is false. Lessonposition checkedQuran 53:1-4 (by the star; your companion has not strayed, nor does he speak from desire)Quran 53:19-20 (al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat)report: the prophet recited surat al-najm and prostrated and everyone present prostrated muslims and mushrikin (unresolved; Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, number not stated)report: tilka al-gharaniq al-ula wa inna shafaatahunna laturtaja (the alleged satanic verses [?]; called false by the host) machine8 min 45 s1:00:37on YouTube
19 Aug 2022video LatestIs Quran 22:52 about the satanic verses incident? No: he rejects the link to 22:52, noting that Surah al-Hajj is Madinan, that the Prophet refused the Makkans' offers of compromise, and that the Quran calls the idols mere stone. Lessonposition checkedQuran 22:52 (Satan cast into the prophet's wish, then God annulled it)report: tilka al-gharaniq al-ula wa inna shafaatahunna laturtaja (the alleged satanic verses [?]; called false by the host) machine5 min 18 s1:09:22on YouTube
19 Aug 2022video What does the Quran say against the satanic verses story? Mufti Abu Layth says al-Suyuti repeated Ibn Hajar's mistake, while the Quran rules the story out: the Prophet does not speak from desire and Satan has no power to speak in his voice. Lessonposition checkedal-SuyutiIbn Hajar al-Asqalanial-Tabarireport: the water of zamzam is for whatever it is drunk for (unresolved; collection not stated) machine7 min 51 s1:26:29on YouTube
19 Feb 2022video LatestWhat do you think of the rational readings of the Quran on the Marvelous Quran channel? Mufti Abu Layth welcomes his fresh, reason-based approach to the Quran but does not agree with some readings he understood from him, such as Zakariya being the father of Jesus. Question from live chatposition checkedMusa (Moses)Isa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Zakariya machine6 min 59 s0:00on YouTube
19 Jan 2022video LatestWhere do Neanderthals fit in the Islamic story of Adam? Islam is not a science manual and says nothing directly about them, but he says the Quran hints that other hominins came before Adam, who was the final 'successor' in that line. Question from live chatposition checkedAdambasharQuran 2:30 (I will place a khalifah on the earth; verse not numbered by him)khalifah machine8 min 16 s0:39on YouTube

2021 · 54

13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth LatestAre there answers to the hardest ethical questions about stories in the Quran? Mufti Abu Layth says he has answered every hard question on his 2016 list, such as the killing of the boy in Moses' story, by research true to the text, and others can build on it. LessonMusa (Moses)al-Khidr (referred to, not named: the one who kills the boy)Christopher HitchensAisha machine7 min 49 s40:01on YouTube
13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Are the stories in the Quran true but not historical, like the story of Adam? Mufti Abu Layth says Adam was the father of humans with modern cognition, and that the tree, which the Quran never calls a fruit or apple, may have been a psychedelic plant that sparked the cognitive revolution. Question from live chatposition checkedAdamstoned ape theory [?] machine2 min 36 s47:50on YouTube
13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth When should reason take priority over religious texts? Reason always comes first, Mufti Abu Layth says, because every reading of scripture is already an interpretation; hadith dogmatism grew from Ibn Taymiyya's era and revived under colonialism. Question from live chatposition checkedaql (reason)Sapir-Whorf hypothesisIbn TaymiyyaIbn al-Salah machine9 min 07 s2:09:48on YouTube
13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth What was the real crime of the people of Lut? Mufti Abu Layth says the people of Lut were destroyed for rejecting God, as in every prophet's story, with their other behaviour secondary. Question from live chatposition checkedLut machine1 min 19 s2:42:28on YouTube
13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was Adam a real person? Yes: Mufti Abu Layth believes Adam was a literal person, the father of the cognitive revolution, though he accepts some read him as a metaphor. Question from live chatposition checkedAdam machine2 min 38 s3:06:04on YouTube
13 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth LatestCan I skip fasting because of work, exams or health, and what do I do instead? It is your call: make the fast up later if you can, or give fidya if your situation will not change, which Mufti Abu Layth bases on the plain wording of Quran 2:184. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 2:184 (those who are able to fast may give fidya)al-Shatibifidyaqada (making up a missed fast) machine6 min 38 s3:28:21on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did Noah really live 950 years? Noah's 950 years refers to an ancient counting system like those of the Sumerian king lists, signalled by the verse's unusual wording, not to ordinary years; he never said the Quran copied an error from the Bible. Lessonguest speechNuh (Noah)Quran 29:14 (a thousand years less fifty)the Sumeriansthe Old Testament machine4 min 30 s3:15:33on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did Abraham really cut up birds that came back to life? In the verse of Abraham and the birds he reads a symbol: birds nurtured by Abraham come to him from afar, a sign of the soul's affinity to God, rather than birds cut up and revived. Lessonguest speechIbrahim (Abraham)Quran 2:260 (Abraham and the four birds) machine7 min 25 s3:19:16on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did the parting of the sea have a natural explanation? God acts through the laws of nature, so the parting of the sea can have a natural explanation such as a strong wind, and Moses exposed the magicians' tricks rather than outdoing them with magic. Lessonguest speechMusa (Moses)report: the prophet questioned the cross pollination of palms the crop failed and he told them to keep to their methods (unresolved)the Book of ExodusAkhenaten machine6 min 23 s3:26:41on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was the murdered man in the story of the cow brought back to life? The verse of the heifer does not say the dead man was revived; like 'in retaliation there is life', it refers to lives saved when a ritual of justice averted tribal war. Lessonguest speechQuran 2:73 (thus Allah gives life to the dead)Quran 2:179 (in retaliation there is life for you)qisas (retaliation)al-Burzuli [?] machine2 min 57 s3:33:04on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was Solomon's hudhud really a bird? The hudhud is addressed in Arabic forms used only for humans, so Mufti Abu Layth reads it as a person, perhaps an agent of Solomon's intelligence service, and he rejects a reading that makes a prophet steal a throne. Lessonguest speechSulayman (Solomon)hudhud (hoopoe)the Queen of Shebazindiq machine4 min 27 s3:36:01on YouTube
6 Apr 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did Jesus survive the crucifixion? Mufti Abu Layth reads the cradle verse as the priests' indignation at being debated by a boy, and says Jesus was taken down from the cross alive after a few hours, which he finds more plausible than a substitute transformed to look like him. Lessonguest speechIsa (Jesus)Gospel of LukeJudas IscariotRoman Empire machine4 min 38 s3:40:28on YouTube
14 Mar 2021video Which Quranic verses does Yasir Qadhi say point to the return of Jesus? Qadhi's clip cites three or four Quranic phrases, Jesus speaking in maturity, the People of the Book believing before his death, and Jesus as a sign of the Hour, and concedes they only strongly suggest a return. Mufti Abu Layth interjects that the sign of the Hour would then have come two thousand years ago. Lessonquoted view, not his positionguest speechYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Quran 3:46 (he will speak to people in the cradle and in maturity)Quran 4:159 (none of the People of the Book but will believe in him before his death) machine7 min 48 s2:46on YouTube
14 Mar 2021video Does 'he will speak to people in maturity' or 'before his death' prove that Jesus will return? The verse about Jesus speaking in the cradle and in maturity concerns those he addresses, children and grown men, and the first to read it as a return was al-Husayn ibn al-Fadl, who died in 282 AH and transmitted strange reports. 'Before his death' was recited by Ubayy and Ibn Abbas as 'before their death' and read by commentators as referring to Jesus, the Prophet, the truth or Allah. Lessonposition checkedQuran 3:46 (he will speak to people in the cradle and in maturity)Quran 5:110 (you spoke to people in the cradle and in maturity)Quran 4:159 (none of the People of the Book but will believe in him before his death)al-Husayn ibn al-Fadl al-Bajali al-Naysaburi machine5 min 14 s1:20:13on YouTube
14 Mar 2021video Which Quranic verses count against Jesus returning? Mufti Abu Layth reads 43:61 as the Quran being knowledge of the Hour, as Hasan and others said, and cites 5:75, 21:34 and 43:59 against a return: Jesus ate food and was subject to natural laws, no human before the Prophet was given eternal life, and Jesus is called an example for the children of Israel alone. Lessonposition checkedQuran 43:61 (he is a sign, or knowledge, of the Hour)Quran 5:75 (the Messiah was only a messenger; they both ate food)Quran 21:34 (we gave no human before you eternal life)Quran 43:59 (he is only a slave whom we favoured and made an example for the children of Israel) machine5 min 14 s1:25:27on YouTube
14 Mar 2021video LatestDoes the Quran say Jesus died, and how did the Prophet understand the verse 'when you took me'? The verse 'I will give you death' and Jesus's words in 5:117 that he does not know what his people did after he was taken show, in Mufti Abu Layth's reading, that Jesus died; the Prophet himself, in a Bukhari report, applies the same verse to his own absence from his companions, confirming the reading. Lessonposition checkedQuran 5:110 (remember my blessings upon you)Quran 3:55 (I will give you death and raise you to me) [?]Quran 5:116-118 (did you tell people to take you and your mother as lords?)report: on the day of judgement people will be raised naked and some of my companions will be turned away and i will say as the righteous slave said machine5 min 15 s1:30:41on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was the Prophet Moses actually the pharaoh Akhenaten? Mufti Abu Layth leans towards the theory that Moses was Akhenaten but says his research is ongoing and it is not established; he notes that the Levites bore Egyptian names. Question from live chatposition checkedAkhenatenMusa (Moses)the Levites machine2 min 29 s37:14on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Which Quranic verses does Yasir Qadhi say point to Jesus coming back? In the clip Qadhi says three verses strongly suggest Jesus's return; Mufti Abu Layth mocks the readings and says the return is not in the Quran. Lessonquoted view, not his positionguest speechYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Quran 3:46Quran 4:159 machine7 min 27 s1:06:29on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the verse about Jesus speaking 'in maturity' mean he will come back? Neither verse proves a return: 'in the cradle and in maturity' refers to the people Jesus addresses, the return reading began with a late transmitter of strange reports, and 'before his death' has several readings. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiQuran 3:46Quran 5:110Quran 4:159 machine4 min 53 s2:23:16on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Which verses of the Quran count against Jesus coming back? 43:61 refers to the Quran as knowledge of the Hour, not to Jesus; 5:75, 21:34 and 43:59, which Qadhi does not mention, count against a return. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Quran 43:61Quran 5:75 machine5 min 50 s2:28:09on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran say that Jesus died? 'I will give you death' and Jesus's words at the Judgement show that he died, and the Prophet applied those words to himself in a Bukhari report, which settles the reading. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Quran 5:110Quran 3:55 machine4 min 56 s2:33:59on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why didn't the Prophet explain every verse of the Quran himself? Leaving the Quran undefined was a blessing, he says: a fixed tafsir would have restricted it, while leaving it to each age's understanding gives it timelessness. Question from live chatposition checkedtafsirsahabah (companions) machine3 min 12 s25:17on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran really say Jesus had no father? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran's elliptical text leaves readers to fill gaps, and that 3:59 on Jesus and Adam allows many readings; he does not believe in the virgin birth. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 3:59Isa (Jesus)Adamthe virgin birth machine5 min 38 s27:52on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran say Jesus was raised up alive? Mufti Abu Layth refers viewers to his detailed videos and says the Quran does not say how Jesus died, which does not mean he did not die, just as it is silent on Moses' death. Question from live chatposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Musa (Moses)Yajuj and MajujShaykh Shadee Elmasry [?] machine1 min 16 s1:10:43on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the story of Dhul Qarnayn mean the earth is flat? No, he says the story of Dhul Qarnayn does not refer to a flat earth, and Muslims should stop buying into the flat-earth narrative. Question from live chatposition checkedDhul Qarnayn machine28 s1:14:32on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does Quran 33:40 mean the Prophet's descendants cannot rule? Mufti Abu Layth says 33:40 simply states that the Prophet is not the father of their men but the seal of the prophets; it is not a proof that his descendants may not rule. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 33:40khatam al-nabiyyin (seal of the prophets) machine1 min 17 s1:15:00on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth LatestWhy does Surah al-Kafirun say 'ma' (what) instead of 'man' (who) for God? Mufti Abu Layth thinks ma is used because it qualifies how God is perceived, since the Meccans also worshipped Allah through others, though he says this is his own understanding. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 109:2-5balagha (rhetoric) [?] machine4 min 07 s1:18:37on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the Quran focus so much on the Israelites? Most peoples had prophets, he says; the Israelites are highlighted because in the Prophet's Arabia they were seen as the scholars of the people of scripture. Question from live chatposition checkedBani Isra'il (the Israelites) machine1 min 46 s1:21:32on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why is quoting science to defend hadith like camel urine risky? Mufti Abu Layth says Hijab cannot yet leave his Salafi audience, and that using science to prove absurd claims usually backfires, as with camel-urine research and earlier polemics. Lessonposition checkedMohammed HijabSalafiHamza Tzortzis [?]Lawrence Krauss machine5 min 47 s1:32:50on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is Sidrat al-Muntaha a real tree? Mufti Abu Layth says the lote tree, Sidrat al-Muntaha, is symbolic language and there is no literal tree. Question from live chatposition checkedSidrat al-Muntaha (the lote tree)JibrilMohammed Hijab machine1 min 17 s1:48:43on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was Adam's garden on earth or in heaven? Yes: the story of Adam took place on earth, he says; he was not beamed down from paradise. Question from live chatposition checkedAdamIbn al-Qayyim [?] machine39 s2:30:31on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran use metaphors, like calling people angels? Yes, he says the Quran is full of metaphors, from God as light to the wall that 'wanted' to fall, and humans are called angels just as they are called devils. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 2:102Quran 24:35Quran 18:77Quran 12:31 machine3 min 06 s3:15:11on YouTube
2 Feb 2021video Did Ibn Ashur say Muslims must believe Jesus was raised alive? Mufti Abu Layth shows that Ibn Ashur, quoted in Shadee Elmasry's post, held only that Jesus was not killed or crucified and was raised and saved, leaving how it happened open to interpretation. Lessonquoted view, not his positionShadee ElmasryIbn Ashural-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir)Isa (Jesus) machine8 min6:15on YouTube
2 Feb 2021video Did Ibn Ashur believe Jesus died? Mufti Abu Layth shows that Ibn Ashur read 'inni mutawaffika' as real death, cited Imam Malik for it, and took texts calling Jesus alive as an honorific life like that of martyrs. Lessonquoted view, not his positionIbn Ashural-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir)Isa (Jesus)Quran 3:55 (inni mutawaffika: I will take you / give you death) machine5 min 20 s8:00on YouTube
2 Feb 2021video Did Ibn Ashur say nothing in the Quran goes against the second coming of Jesus? Mufti Abu Layth says Ibn Ashur wrote that the Quran does not deal with the second coming, not that nothing in it opposes it; the post confused yata'arrad with a verb meaning 'to oppose'. Lessonposition checkedShadee ElmasryIbn Ashural-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir)Isa (Jesus) machine7 min 50 s15:02on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the Quran seem focused on men, and why are two women witnesses needed? The Quran asks for two women witnesses only for debt contracts, because a lone woman was easier to intimidate, not because women are lesser; otherwise one woman equals one man, and the masculine address reflects historically patriarchal societies. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 2:282 (two women witnesses for a debt, so that if one errs the other reminds her)report: women are the counterparts of men (unresolved; collection not stated)Frans de Waal machine9 min 11 s21:34on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth If the Prophet couldn't forbid what Allah allowed, how can scholars issue fatwas? The verse rebukes the Prophet for forbidding himself something permissible to please others, not for legislating; things are permissible by default, so declaring something haram is a weighty step. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 66:1 (why do you forbid what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking to please your wives)everything is permissible by default until proven otherwise (al-asl al-ibaha)istishab [?] (the presumption of continuity)fatwa machine3 min 59 s41:12on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is Prophet Shu'ayb the same as Jethro in the Bible? At face value they seem to be the same person, since Moses goes to the priest of Midian in both accounts, but he says he has not researched it. Question from live chatShu'aybJethro (biblical)Musa (Moses) machine1 min 17 s45:11on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Do creation myths in other cultures share a source with the Islamic account? Mufti Abu Layth feels the world's creation myths probably share a common origin, and suggests the name Adam predates Arabic and Hebrew, possibly from Sanskrit, though he is not sure. Question from live chatposition checkedAdam machine3 min 58 s52:59on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was docetism about someone else being crucified in Jesus's place? No: he says docetism was a debate over whether Jesus was truly human, and that the Quran says the crucifixion only appeared to succeed, not that a look-alike was crucified. Lessonguest speechDr Umar Faruq AbdullahIsa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Quran 4:157 (they did not kill him nor crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them) machine10 min 31 s2:31:42on YouTube
26 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did Jesus really speak as a newborn baby in the Quran? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran does not state that Jesus spoke as a newborn, and that the cradle verse points to the episode in Luke of the boy Jesus arguing with the Temple priests. Question from live chatposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Quran 19:29 (how can we speak to one who is in the cradle, a child)Gospel of Luke machine2 min 39 s2:47:26on YouTube
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth What is the Ark of the Covenant in Islam? The Quran mentions the Ark (tabut) without saying what was in it, Mufti Abu Layth says; one early Maliki linguist described the sakinah in a way that resembles the cherubim. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 2:248tabut (the Ark)sakinahIbn Faris [?] machine4 min 30 s1:06:12on YouTube
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Can I say Prophet Yusuf was more handsome than Prophet Muhammad? Praising Yusuf's beauty takes nothing from the Prophet Muhammad, Mufti Abu Layth says; the prophets are not in a competition. Question written questionposition checkedYusuf (Joseph)Yunus (Jonah)report: do not say i am better than yunus (unresolved; collection not stated) machine2 min 22 s2:35:33on YouTube
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why did Moses have to strike the sea with his staff for it to part? The sea did not part instantly but over a long while, Mufti Abu Layth says; striking it showed the Israelites the way would be through it. Question written questionposition checkedMusa (Moses)PharaohColin Humphreysthe Exodus machine1 min 51 s2:43:20on YouTube
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did Ibn Ashur say Jesus was raised alive and will return? Mufti Abu Layth says a preacher's post misquotes the tafsir it cites, which takes the verse to mean Jesus really died and leaves how he was raised open to interpretation. LessonIsa (Jesus)Ibn Ashur [?]al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir) [?]Imam Malik machine12 min 53 s2:45:11on YouTube
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran say nothing against Jesus' second coming? Mufti Abu Layth says the post mistranslates the tafsir: it says the Quran does not address the second coming, not that nothing in the Quran opposes it. LessonIsa (Jesus)Ibn Ashur [?]Quran 5:110 machine9 min 42 s2:58:04on YouTube
12 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth LatestChat round: Trump's Twitter ban, Surah Ya Sin in the morning, and banter Light chat: he is unsure how he feels about Trump's Twitter ban and says reciting Ya Sin each morning is not a sunnah. OtherTwitterDonald TrumpSurah Ya Sin machine4 min 21 s25:46on YouTube
12 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Who is Surah al-Munafiqun about? Mufti Abu Layth says that, though the verses are general, Surah al-Munafiqun referred at the time to the hypocrites of Medina. Question from live chatposition checkedSurah al-Munafiqunmunafiqun (hypocrites)Jordan Peterson machine1 min 16 s50:06on YouTube
12 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth What do you think of Harun Yahya and his books? Mufti Abu Layth says Harun Yahya's scientific-miracles books spread a lot of wrong information, and mocks the 1,000-year sentence given to Adnan Oktar. Question from live chatHarun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)IPCI (Islamic Propagation Centre International)Ahmed DeedatMohammed Hijab machine8 min 06 s51:30on YouTube
12 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why wasn't the Quran compiled as a book in the Prophet's time? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran was written but not bound as a book in the Prophet's lifetime because it was dynamic, allowing variations that did not change its meaning. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 12:2 (we sent it down as an Arabic Quran) [?]Quran 4:82 (do they not ponder the Quran) [?]kitab (scripture) machine3 min 45 s1:17:34on YouTube
12 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth A preacher's 'discoveries': Gog and Magog in Kyrgyzstan and Noah's ark at al-Judi Mockery of a preacher's claims to have located Gog and Magog in Kyrgyzstan and Noah's ark in Turkey. Otherguest speechYa'juj and Ma'juj (Gog and Magog)Nuh (Noah)Quran 11:44 (the ark came to rest on al-Judi)the Old Testament machine9 min 21 s3:02:00on YouTube
5 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Who was Lilith in Jewish legend? Mufti Abu Layth retells the Jewish legend of Lilith, Adam's first wife, who left him over equality and became a night demon. Lessonquoted view, not his positionDawah ManLilithAdamEve (Hawwa) machine7 min 07 s1:08:07on YouTube
5 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is the Quran a miracle that proves Islam to everyone? Mufti Abu Layth holds the Quran is subjectively miraculous in its effect but not a universal miracle that converts all who hear it, and he cut the exchange short out of discomfort. Lessonposition checkedmu'jizah (miracle)al-Mazini (the grammarian) machine5 min 42 s1:24:16on YouTube
5 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was Christianity still a true religion until Muhammad's first revelation? Mufti Abu Layth reframes the question: Jesus was sent to the Israelites, not the Arabs, and monotheists existed in Arabia before the Prophet. Question from live chatposition checkedIsa (Jesus)hunafa (pre-Islamic monotheists) machine1 min 20 s2:13:43on YouTube

2020 · 129

11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does God's morality change over time? The guest says universal morality does not change, only ritual law: the Quran corrects the biblical conquest narrative by implying the Israelites inherited Egypt rather than slaughtering another people. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Musa (Moses)Pharaohthe Bible machine2 min 11 s47:41on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Do animals have morality, and does that mean morality just evolved? Mufti Abu Layth sees a sense of justice in primates as evidence of a raw moral fitrah that humans develop further; the guest warns this can suggest morality is merely evolved and says rooting it in God is the necessary step. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)fitrah machine4 min 06 s49:52on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How should the stories in the Quran be read? The guest describes his dissertation on jihad in the Quran and his project translating Muhammad Ahmad Khalafallah's suppressed study of the Quran's narrative art, which he says is right. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Muhammad Ahmad Khalafallahal-Fann al-Qasasi fi al-Quran al-Karim [?] (Khalafallah)jihad machine3 min 59 s59:44on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Are the stories in the Quran meant to be literal history? The guest argues, following Khalafallah and Ibn Rushd, that the Quran's stories are sacred literature and legend, using symbol and parable for theological ends rather than reporting literal history. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Muhammad Ahmad KhalafallahQuran 18:22 (the number of the People of the Cave)Ashab al-Kahf (the People of the Cave) machine6 min 58 s1:02:23on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Can I accept evolution and still take the Quran's stories as true? The guest calls for reading the Quran wholesale as sacred literature, accepting evolution as scientific fact while holding that religion's symbolic truths, not science, ground human rights and meaning. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Rudolf BultmannCharles Darwin machine3 min 46 s1:09:21on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran speak in symbols and metaphors? Mufti Abu Layth agrees with Ibn Rushd that the Quran speaks in symbols and that scripture is a kind of art, but asks whether the guest thinks the prophets and their stories are fictitious. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Ibn Rushd (Averroes)Yuval Noah HarariSapiens (Yuval Noah Harari) machine2 min 48 s1:13:07on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Are paradise and hell in the Quran meant literally? The guest, following Ibn Rushd against al-Ghazali, says belief requires accepting the afterlife, not literal readings of its details; Mufti Abu Layth agrees the afterlife is symbolic but says the prophets' stories are of this world. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)al-GhazaliTahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers)Ibn Rushd (Averroes) machine4 min 28 s1:15:55on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the Quran tell the same story in different ways? The guest says the Quran's stories are set in sacred, not historical, time and follow archetypes that speak to the Prophet's own circumstances, which is why the same story, such as Lot's or the golden calf, is told differently. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Lut (Lot)the golden calf of the IsraelitesAhl al-Kitab (People of the Book) machine4 min 29 s1:20:23on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did Jesus really speak in the cradle, and did the earlier prophets exist? The guest says historians can be confident that Muhammad and Jesus existed but less so of earlier figures, and that the Quran's Jesus stories, such as speaking in the cradle, are dramatised; Mufti Abu Layth says no clear verse says Jesus spoke in the cradle. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Isa (Jesus)Muhammad Ahmad Khalafallah machine5 min 37 s1:24:52on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did the Prophet Muhammad perform miracles? The guest argues that the Quran implies the Prophet performed no miracles and ties signs to compulsion, so traditionalists read miracles in from hadith; both speakers appear to reject the view that every prophet needs a miracle. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)mu'jizah (miracle)the splitting of the moonreport: the prophet had no shadow (unresolved; cited as an example of miracle reports) machine4 min 27 s1:30:29on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did angels really fight at the battle of Badr? The guest says the angels at Badr are a literary description of God strengthening the believers' hearts, since the named Muslims who killed the enemy chiefs are known, and that the same reading applies to earlier prophets' stories. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)the battle of BadrMuhammad Ahmad KhalafallahJibril machine4 min 06 s1:34:56on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Should archaeology worry believers about the Quran's stories? The guest, as a self-described Islamic modernist following Fazlur Rahman, says believers need not fear archaeology, since the Quran re-attributes Jesus' miracles to God for theological rather than historical ends. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Fazlur Rahmanthe ExodusIsa (Jesus) machine3 min 12 s1:42:25on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the story of Adam in the Quran a myth? The guest reads the Adam story as sacred myth whose point is human dignity, improving on the Babylonian and biblical accounts by removing original sin and blame of the woman; Mufti Abu Layth holds the figures and events were real but told to appeal to listeners. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)AdamAllama Muhammad IqbalCharles Darwin machine7 min 08 s1:45:37on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran treat every human life as sacred, even in war? The guest says the Quran holds every human soul sacred, which classical exegetes on jihad missed; Mufti Abu Layth says Muslim scholarship must shift from outdated fiqh to ethics. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)jihadDar al-Harbdhimmi machine3 min 27 s1:52:45on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran actually say the miracles happened? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran often never states that a miracle occurred, as with the table for Jesus, and that the prophets were real though later assumptions colour them; the guest says the Quran rearticulates the discourses of its milieu. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Quran 5:112-115 (the table requested by the disciples of Jesus)Isa (Jesus)Musa (Moses) machine5 min 43 s1:56:12on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Who was Dhul Qarnayn, and who are Gog and Magog? Mufti Abu Layth identifies Dhul Qarnayn most likely with Cyrus the Great and reads Gog and Magog as havoc-wreaking forces, later the colonial powers; the guest says this already relies on ad hoc literary reinterpretation. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Dhul QarnaynCyrus the GreatYasir Qadhi machine4 min 55 s2:01:55on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the Dhul Qarnayn story based on the legend of Alexander? The guest says scholarship shows the Dhul Qarnayn story derives from a Byzantine Christian legend of Alexander walling in Gog and Magog, known to the Quran's first audience; Mufti Abu Layth asks why the Quran then tells it so ambiguously. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Alexander the GreatSidney Griffith [?]the Byzantine Empire machine4 min 34 s2:06:50on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the Quran tell the story of Dhul Qarnayn so briefly? The guest says the Quran retells the known legend concisely to show the Prophet's knowledge from God, while stripping its Christian imperial ending; Mufti Abu Layth objects that its unusual wording is too vague for that. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Dhul QarnaynAhl al-Kitab (People of the Book)Muhammad Ahmad Khalafallah machine5 min 40 s2:11:24on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What do the unusual words in the Dhul Qarnayn verses mean? Mufti Abu Layth argues the wording of 18:83-90 is too vague to be a retelling of the Alexander legend; the guest says the Syriac subtext explains it and that without it the passage invites endless speculative readings, and they agree to differ. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Quran 18:83-86 (they ask you about Dhul Qarnayn; he followed a sabab)Quran 18:89-90 (a people for whom no covering was made)sabab (means, cause) machine8 min 39 s2:17:04on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the Quran give so little detail about some prophets? The guest says the brief, repeated stories are archetypes recalled to console the Prophet, which audiences already knew; Mufti Abu Layth argues that following an archetype does not show a story was invented. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Yahya (John)Yusuf (Joseph)Musa (Moses) machine7 min 25 s2:25:43on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why does the guest criticise Yasir Qadhi's views on jinn and evolution? The guest criticises Yasir Qadhi's dogmatic style and his literal readings of Dhul Qarnayn, evolution and jinn, offering a medical explanation for exorcism accounts; Mufti Abu Layth jokes about the zombie theory and calls Brubaker courteous. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)Yasir QadhiDaniel BrubakerUsama Hasan machine7 min 56 s2:33:08on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Are the jinn real, or a symbol? The guest says the Quran rearticulated a late antique belief in jinn to subordinate them to God, that he does not literally believe in them, and that Shaytan personifies human evil; Mufti Abu Layth agrees that inner impulses are personified as good and bad forces. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)jinnruhshirk machine6 min 46 s2:41:04on YouTube
10 Dec 2020video Yasir Qadhi's reply to Jay Smith over 'holes in the standard narrative' A played clip of Yasir Qadhi answering Christian polemicists who used his 'holes in the standard narrative' remark, calling them unqualified and likening variant readings to accents. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechYasir QadhiJay SmithDavid WoodDaniel Brubaker machine6 min 58 s0:00on YouTube
10 Dec 2020video Is Jay Smith a reliable critic of the Quran's preservation? No: he agrees with Yasir Qadhi that Jay Smith and David Wood are not clued up and chase sensation, repeating academics' summaries without understanding them. DiscussionYasir QadhiJay SmithMohammed HijabPatricia Crone machine6 min 59 s6:58on YouTube
10 Dec 2020video Yasir Qadhi still has not explained his 'holes in the narrative' Mufti Abu Layth says that the controversy over 'holes in the narrative' is one Yasir Qadhi landed himself in deeply, since he never offered a response or clarity at the time beyond suggesting people take his course. He expects critics like Jay Smith to chase him over it because they know he cannot answer it. He jokes at length about Yasir Qadhi wanting Muslims to popularise the word 'ultracrepidarian', saying it shows he has lived most of his life in a library. He says he respects him for saying he holds a different view and for raising awareness that there are some forty views, but is disappointed that in what was meant as his final word he again evaded explaining what he actually believes. DiscussionYasir QadhiJay Smith machine5 min 46 s13:57on YouTube
10 Dec 2020video Was the Quran always fixed word for word, or was it flexible at first? Mufti Abu Layth holds the Quran was dynamic in the Prophet's time, with companions allowed to substitute synonyms, and that a fixed vowel-for-vowel text is a modern idea. Writing it down in a worldly script brought its own constraints. Lessonposition checkedAsh'arikalam Allah (eternal speech, al-kalam al-azali)al-Baqillani [?] (name garbled in the transcript)al-Bajuri machine8 min 51 s19:43on YouTube
10 Dec 2020video Can we substitute words of the Quran today as the companions did? No: the Quran was dynamic in the Prophet's time, but after Uthman's codex and the canonised readings it has reached us fixed, so changing it today would not be correct. He feels word substitution was the original default, not a mere dispensation. Lessonposition checkedUthman ibn Affanrasm uthmani (the Uthmanic consonantal text)Abu Bakr ibn Mujahidqira'at (the variant readings) machine6 min 25 s28:34on YouTube
21 Nov 2020video Does the riba verse prove that jinn can possess people? The riba verse 2:275 uses the image of being struck by the devil as a frame of reference the Arabs knew, like the heads of devils in 37:65; it does not establish possession. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:275 (those who consume riba stand as one struck by Satan)Quran 37:65 (its shoots are like the heads of devils)Quran 14:22 (Satan: I had no power over you)riba machine3 min 53 s17:05on YouTube
21 Nov 2020video If a jinn could possess me, how could I be blamed for anything? Satan's own words in 14:22, that he had no power over people and only invited them, rule out possession: if the devil could physically prevent prayer or cause harm, people could not be blamed and responsibility would collapse. Lessonposition checkedQuran 14:22 (Satan: I had no power over you, I only invited you)Quran 38:41 (Ayyub: Satan has touched me with hardship)Ayyub (Job)waswasa (whispering) machine5 min 16 s20:58on YouTube
15 Nov 2020video Does the Quran mention the evil eye? No: the Quran mentions envy (hasad) but never the evil eye, and the verse about eyes making the Prophet slip is a metaphor for hateful stares, as Ibn Ashur and others explain. Lessonposition checkedQuran 68:51 (they would almost make you slip with their eyes)hasad (envy)al-'ayn (the evil eye)Sahih al-Bukhari machine6 min 43 s2:41on YouTube
15 Nov 2020video Confirmation bias: reading the evil eye into the Quran Mufti Abu Layth says that people came to Islam already believing the evil eye was science and, through confirmation bias, found it in verses that do not mention it, such as the verse about eyes almost making the Prophet slip, even though many exegetes did not read it that way. He recommends the Urdu tafsir of Abdul Karim Athari, whom he describes as coming from a small, unusually reason-based circle within the Ahl-e-Hadith of India, and says Athari also reads the verse as the disbelievers staring as though to trip the Prophet, before calling him insane. Lessonposition checkedQuran 68:51 (they would almost make you slip with their eyes)Abdul Karim AthariSalafiHanafi school machine3 min 22 s41:06on YouTube
15 Nov 2020video Does Surah Yusuf prove the evil eye is real? No: Jacob told his sons to use different gates for their safety and to avoid drawing attention, not because of the evil eye. They had already been to Egypt, so the evil eye reading makes no sense. Lessonposition checkedQuran 12:58-68 (Yusuf's brothers in Egypt; Jacob's advice on the gates)Yusuf (Joseph)Ya'qub (Jacob)Binyamin (Benjamin) machine11 min 39 s44:28on YouTube
15 Nov 2020video Is Surat al-Falaq about protection from the evil eye? No: it seeks refuge from the harm envious people act out and from the superstitious culture around magic, not from an evil eye. The Quran's silence on the evil eye is, to him, a sign of its truth. Lessonposition checkedQuran 113:1-5 (Surat al-Falaq)hasad (envy)Ibn Ashur machine3 min 53 s1:08:18on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Did God really command Ibrahim to sacrifice his son? No: in Mufti Abu Layth's reading the command did not come from God, and the Quran in Surah al-Saffat only reports that Ibrahim saw a dream and that his son urged him to act on it. The notion of sacrificing a son is traced to the culture of the ancient Near East. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimIsmailIshaqQuran 37:102 (my son, I see in a dream that I am sacrificing you) machine3 min 58 s0:00on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Where did the idea of sacrificing a son come from in Ibrahim's time? Human sacrifice to gods such as Moloch and Baal was a widespread practice of the ancient Near East, and the Bible's story of Jephthah sacrificing his daughter shows it. Mufti Abu Layth says this surrounding culture explains how such a dream could come to Ibrahim. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimJephthahthe BibleBook of Judges [?] machine3 min 57 s3:58on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Does the Quran say the sacrifice of Ibrahim's son was a test from God? The verses say Ibrahim was truthful to his vision and that this was a clear trial, but never that God sent the dream or the trial. In Mufti Abu Layth's reading the ransom of a ram rescued the son and ended human sacrifice. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimQuran 37:103-107 (O Ibrahim, you have fulfilled the vision; this was indeed the clear trial; we ransomed him with a great sacrifice)Tafsir al-Sam'anibala (trial) machine4 min7:55on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Why did most commentators say God commanded the sacrifice? Ibn Abbas is reported to have read Ibrahim's words as 'I think I have been commanded', and some commentators say the relief itself was the test. Mufti Abu Layth attributes the common view to early Muslims absorbing Jewish narratives. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimIbn Abbasal-Muharrar al-Wajiz of Ibn Atiyya [?]Israiliyyat machine2 min 39 s11:55on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Is it wrong to believe that God asked Ibrahim to kill his son? Mufti Abu Layth says the belief is absurd and, on inspection, blasphemous, because it has God asking a father to murder his child for his pleasure and then stopping him, like a mock execution. The Quran never says God told Ibrahim to sacrifice, though it could have. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimthe Bible machine2 min 38 s14:34on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Did the classical scholars ever question whether God would command Ibrahim to kill his son? Mufti Abu Layth says earlier scholars debated the side issues, such as rulings coming through dreams or abrogation before an act, but none asked whether God would want a father to kill his son. He satirises the discussions as all grammar and no elephant in the room. Lessonposition checkedIbrahimnaskh (abrogation)ru'ya (dream vision) machine2 min 36 s21:09on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video Are Muslims who believe God commanded the sacrifice guilty of blasphemy? No: Mufti Abu Layth does not accuse individual Muslims of blasphemy, because they repeat a story they were raised with and have not examined it. He distinguishes this from agenda-driven claims about the Prophet, and ridicules the defence that God only asked Ibrahim to assist his son's suicide. Lessonposition checkedIbrahim machine1 min 18 s23:45on YouTube
28 Oct 2020video If God never commanded the sacrifice, why do the early sources all say he did? Mufti Abu Layth agrees that no primary sources support his reading and explains it by early Muslims absorbing Israelite material, by the brutal environment of the age being projected onto God, and by the absence of anything from the Prophet saying God commanded it. He repeats that a God who stages a mock execution of a child is unacceptable, and that Allah never says the command was his. Question from live chatposition checkedIbrahimIsrailiyyatYahweh machine4 min 55 s26:22on YouTube
27 Oct 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth What does 'justice' mean in the Quran's verse on marrying more than one wife? Mufti Abu Layth says the verse requires equal treatment of wives as the benchmark, accepting human shortfalls, and does not rule polygamy out. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 4:3Quran 4:129polygamyAbu Talib machine9 min 51 s50:22on YouTube
27 Oct 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Who were the Bedouin Arabs criticised in Surah al-Tawbah? Mufti Abu Layth says the a'rab of Surah al-Tawbah were semi-nomadic raiding tribes not under settled rule, some of whom joined only as a power play. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 9:97-99 machine6 min 11 s2:22:11on YouTube
27 Oct 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Can I recite the Quran in the shower? Mufti Abu Layth says deliberately reciting the Quran in the shower is bad etiquette, though a verse slipping out by habit is fine. Question from live chatposition checkedadab machine1 min 06 s2:49:56on YouTube
17 Oct 2020video Does the verse of light describe an expanded state of consciousness? The verse of light, 24:35, is an approximation that resonates with those whose consciousness has expanded, and entheogenic experience was part and parcel of the tradition without having a name. Lessonposition checkedQuran 24:35 (the verse of light)Abdullah Yusuf AliAbdullah ibn Mas'udRumi machine6 min 13 s29:48on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Was Jesus born without a father according to the Quran? Mufti Abu Layth leans to the scholars who hold Jesus had a natural birth, arguing that the verse refuting God having a child only works if every human is born of two parents. Discussionposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Joseph, husband of MaryQuran 6:101 (how can He have a child when He has no companion; he calls it Medinan) machine6 min 11 s13:38on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Why do most Muslims believe in the virgin birth? Mufti Abu Layth says the belief spread through the dominance of the Christian narrative across the empires surrounding Arabia. Discussionposition checkedthe virgin birththe Byzantine Empirethe Aksumite kingdomAdam machine1 min 50 s19:49on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Does evolution contradict the Quran's account of Adam? No: he says evolution does not clash with Islam, reading 23:12-14 as Adam passing through a womb and Adam as the first human with full consciousness. Discussionposition checkedAdamQuran 23:12-14 (insan from an extract of clay, then a drop in a firm lodging, then the stages of the embryo)Quran 21:30 (every living thing from water)insan (human being) machine9 min 37 s21:39on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video If God made the laws of nature, can He break them? God is not stuck with the laws of nature; He created them by choice and keeps to them, just as He keeps His promises about salvation. Discussionposition checkedsunnat Allah (God's unchanging way) machine6 min 04 s31:16on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video If humans evolved, why are there still chimpanzees? Nobody claims humans came from chimpanzees; both share a common ancestor, and evolution is now shown through genetics, which he says poses no problem for Islam. Discussionposition checkedAdamQuran 49:13 (We created you from male and female)Musa (Moses)Nuh (Noah) machine5 min 46 s37:20on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Why do some Muslims struggle to accept that Adam might have had parents? Mufti Abu Layth says nothing in Islam falls apart if Adam had parents, so the resistance must come from something other than Islam, and God keeping His own rules is no limitation. Discussionposition checkedAdamakhirahbarzakhsunnat Allah (God's unchanging way) machine7 min 30 s43:06on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Does the Quran say Adam was made from clay or from a drop of sperm? Taking 23:12-14 entirely literally leaves one stuck, since the same insan made from clay is then a drop of sperm; the clay may refer to something like DNA. Discussionposition checkedQuran 23:12-14 (insan from an extract of clay, then a drop in a firm lodging, then the stages of the embryo)Adaminsan (human being)kun fa-yakun (be, and it is) machine4 min 24 s50:36on YouTube
13 Oct 2020video Why doesn't the Quran clearly deny the virgin birth? To build bridges with the Christians: the Quran used their terms and left room for their belief without affirming it, compromising only not on the Trinity. Discussionposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Quran 3:59 (the likeness of Jesus is that of Adam)Quran 4:171 (the Messiah, His word)Quran 3:64 (People of the Book, come to a common word) machine2 min 31 s55:00on YouTube
2 Sep 2020video What did Daniel Haqiqatjou say about Yasir Qadhi calling verses mushkil? In a clip, Daniel Haqiqatjou argues that Yasir Qadhi's explanation of 'problematic' verses as mushkil fails, since he says mushkil classically means ambiguous, not at odds with reason or science. Lessonquoted view, not his positionguest speechDaniel HaqiqatjouJonathan BrownYasir QadhiMohammed Hijab machine2 min 37 s0:00on YouTube
2 Sep 2020video Does mushkil mean ambiguous or problematic? Both sides have a point: mushkil was used technically for texts needing reconciliation and for the indeterminable, while Yasir Qadhi most likely meant it simply as 'problematic'. Lessonposition checkedJonathan BrownDaniel HaqiqatjouYasir Qadhial-Shafi'i machine4 min 06 s6:30on YouTube
2 Sep 2020video What does Mufti Abu Layth make of the Brown and Haqiqatjou dispute over mushkil? Mufti Abu Layth says Brown tends to nitpick Arabic instead of engaging the argument, rejects Haqiqatjou's claim that his credentials are irrelevant, and calls both sides strangely dogmatic. Lessonguest speechJonathan BrownDaniel Haqiqatjoual-Bunani [?] (the scholar the host quoted in BukhariGate)ijazah (authorisation to teach, with a chain) machine4 min 39 s9:17on YouTube
24 Aug 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is it right to attack critics of Islam personally? Mufti Abu Layth says Mohammed Hijab bears some responsibility for provoking the Quran-tearing, and urges Muslims to attack arguments, not people and their families. Lessonguest speechMohammed HijabDavid Wood machine5 min 36 s1:35:34on YouTube
24 Aug 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Was the ifk in Surat al-Nur really about Aisha? Mufti Abu Layth holds that the Quran's ifk verses were revealed about rumours concerning Mariya, though he believes an earlier incident with Aisha also happened. Lessonposition checkedthe incident of the ifk (the slander of Aisha)Mariya al-QibtiyyaAishaQuran 24:11-20 (the ifk verses of Surat al-Nur) machine6 min 09 s2:26:25on YouTube
19 Aug 2020Responding to Refutations Introduction: the Quran-preservation debacle and a leaked 2016 email Mufti Abu Layth introduces a commentary on who leaked a private 2016 email of Yasir Qadhi on the Quran's preservation, an episode he calls a cataclysmic debacle. OtherFarid [?]Yasir Qadhi machine2 min 34 s0:00on YouTube
19 Aug 2020Responding to Refutations Who leaked the emails: the missing link revealed After years of uncertainty over who leaked Yasir Qadhi's email, Mufti Abu Layth says it has transpired that Farid was behind the leak. OtherFarid [?]Yasir QadhiKnowledge Revival [?] machine2 min 37 s2:34on YouTube
19 Aug 2020Responding to Refutations What did the leak of Yasir Qadhi's emails on the Quran's preservation lead to? The leak of Yasir Qadhi's emails set off a fitna in which people doubted or left Islam, and Yasir Qadhi's own explanation made it worse. Being clever and well-read does not make someone an academic. LessonFarid [?]Yasir QadhiAbdul Rahman HassanMullah Omar machine3 min 07 s8:46on YouTube
16 Jul 2020video Does Islam allow converting churches and other places of worship into mosques? Islam never set out to convert other religions' holy sites: Umar left Jerusalem's churches alone, and Quran 22:40 counts monasteries, churches and synagogues among places where Allah's name is glorified and which He protects. The Hagia Sophia's conversion happened, but it was not what Islam encourages. Lessonposition checkedQuran 22:40-41 (Surah al-Hajj)Umar ibn al-KhattabSultan Mehmed al-Fatihthe conquest of Constantinople machine5 min 15 s2:43on YouTube
14 Jul 2020live stream What do Illiyyin and Sijjin mean in the Quran? They refer to a record or place of the righteous and the wicked; he takes afterlife imagery as symbolic and promises more next week. Question from live chatposition checkedIlliyyinSijjinmufassirun machine2 min 32 s39:04on YouTube
14 Jul 2020live stream Is al-Zamakhshari's tafsir al-Kashshaf worth reading? Mufti Abu Layth praises al-Kashshaf as linguistically overwhelming and al-Zamakhshari as a legend, while noting the Mu'tazili oddities in it; the Mu'tazila were great scholars, often over-demonised. Question from live chatposition checkedal-Kashshafal-ZamakhshariAsas al-Balagha [?]balagha (rhetoric) machine4 min 24 s45:21on YouTube
14 Jul 2020live stream Why does the Quran talk about something as small as the Prophet's dinner guests? They are not trivial: the verse teaches that small transgressions like imposing on people matter, and such etiquettes build a healthy society. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 33:53 (the Prophet's dinner guests)Quran 2:26 (the example of a mosquito or what is above it)mufassirun machine6 min 51 s1:06:38on YouTube
14 Jul 2020live stream Does Islam allow turning churches into mosques? Islam never set out to convert other faiths' holy sites: Umar left Jerusalem's churches alone, and Quran 22:40 names them among places where Allah's name is glorified. Lessonposition checkedQuran 22:40-41 (Surah al-Hajj)Umar ibn al-KhattabSultan Mehmed al-Fatihthe conquest of Constantinople machine5 min 09 s1:17:16on YouTube
10 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is there an order and coherence to the surahs of the Quran? Mufti Abu Layth and the guest trace Farahi's school of Quranic coherence, which the guest illustrates with surahs that come in pairs. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechShaykh Omar BalochHamiduddin FarahiAmin Ahsan IslahiJaved Ahmad Ghamidi machine7 min 04 s14:32on YouTube
10 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran predict that modern industrial society will collapse? The guest reads Quran 10:24 as a warning that oil-based modern life will collapse; Mufti Abu Layth expects human knowledge to find new energy. Discussionguest speechShaykh Omar BalochQuran 10:24Ottoman Empire machine2 min 30 s50:17on YouTube
10 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran say every city will be destroyed before Judgement Day? The guest reads Quran 17:58 as a sign that humanity is headed for trouble; Mufti Abu Layth points to verses of blessing and God's lack of need to punish. Discussionguest speechShaykh Omar BalochQuran 17:58Quran 4:147 machine3 min 12 s1:02:24on YouTube
10 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What is the main theme of Surah al-Kahf? Mufti Abu Layth agrees consumerism is destructive and reads Surah al-Kahf as also being about identity and belonging. Discussionguest speechShaykh Omar BalochQuran 18:28 machine3 min 14 s1:21:06on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did Muslims always see the Quran as God's word in the form of a book? The guest argues that the idea of the Quran as God's literal words in book form was not held by all Muslims historically, and that the Quran presents itself as a series of oral revelations manifesting a heavenly writing. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Dr Shehzad [?] (Shehzad Saleem)ahruf machine6 min 11 s7:40on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What difference does it make that the Quran was first oral and only later written down? The guest argues that the Mushaf is a secondary product that loses the context and immediacy of the oral revelation, like a printed map compared with live navigation. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Mushafwahy machine6 min 59 s13:26on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did revelation end with the Prophet, or does inspiration continue? The guest says that for Shi'is, Sufis and arguably jurists some form of revelatory inspiration continues; Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran will always continue to mean different things to different people over time. Discussionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Imamateawliya (friends of God)Jalal al-Din Rumi machine2 min 38 s19:58on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does 'Kitab' in the Quran mean a book? Kitab in the Quran means divine writing or prescription rather than a physical book; the guest distinguishes the heavenly Kitab Mubin from the Arabic Quran, and Mufti Abu Layth agrees Kitab cannot mean book. Discussionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)al-Kitabal-Kitab al-MubinQuran 2:183 machine5 min 22 s22:36on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the 'Book of Allah' the same thing as the written Quran? The guest argues that equating Kitab Allah with the Mushaf is a later interpretation that downsized the Quran's concept of a transcendent divine writing. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Kitab AllahMushafreport: the book of allah is sufficient for us (unresolved; cited as in Sahih al-Bukhari, number not stated) machine5 min 55 s27:58on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the Ash'ari view of God's speech really different from the Mu'tazili view? The guest says the Ash'aris borrowed heavily from the Mu'tazila but differ on whether speech is sounds and letters or meaning; Mufti Abu Layth says sectarian politics produced ambiguous creeds. Discussionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Ash'ariMu'tazilaMaturidi machine4 min 07 s46:24on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is Arabic an eternal, divine language? Mufti Abu Layth rejects grammarians' claim that Arabic is eternal; both describe the Ash'ari view that revelation takes the language of its audience. Discussionmay contain a quoted viewguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Abu Ali al-FarisiIbn Abbasreport: jibril was given the message of every prophet in arabic and translated it (unresolved; attributed to Ibn Abbas) machine2 min 02 s50:31on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Was revelation words dictated by Gabriel, or inspiration the Prophet put into words? The guest argues that Quranic wahy is non-verbal inspiration through the ruh which the Prophet put into Arabic; Mufti Abu Layth says he finds himself with those who hold revelation was expressed within the Prophet. Discussionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)wahyruhal-Ruh al-Amin machine4 min 57 s53:07on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Were the companions allowed to change words of the Quran, and was that only a temporary concession? The guest argues the Prophet allowed multiple oral forms of the Quran; Mufti Abu Layth says this dynamism was the Quran's inherent nature, not a temporary concession. Discussionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)ahrufreport: the quran was revealed in seven ahrufImam Malik machine6 min 54 s1:03:43on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth If the Quran wasn't a book, why is it on a heavenly tablet? The guest says the one verse on the guarded tablet refers to 'a recitation', not an Arabic text, and that the Quran became Arabic for its audience. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Quran 85:21-22al-Lawh al-Mahfuz (the guarded tablet)Quran 41:3 [?] (fussilat ayatuhu) machine1 min 49 s1:35:02on YouTube
3 Jul 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does God not love non-believers? The guest reads the verse as saying that certain deeds block God's love from reaching a person, not that God's love is selective. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Khalil Andani (guest)Quran 3:32 [?] (Allah does not love the disbelievers)rahmah machine1 min 30 s1:38:38on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Can Muslims do ijtihad from the Quran alone? Mufti Abu Layth agrees with the guest that making Islam Bukhari-centric is a problem, as his BukhariGate series argues. The guest says the Quran declares itself easy to understand and that whoever thinks it difficult or rejects its clear verses loses access to it. Discussionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 54:17 (we have made the Quran easy to remember)Sahih al-Bukhariijtihad machine2 min 36 s38:24on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does any hadith actually explain the Quran? The guest challenges hadith followers to find a hadith that explains the Quran, says the Quran uses the word hadith negatively and sunnah only for God's law, and holds that descriptive reports are history, not religion. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip Yukselal-huruf al-muqatta'at (the initial letters)hadithsunnah machine6 min 37 s52:50on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran abrogate its own verses? The guest denies abrogation, reading 2:106 as about miracles replaced over time, since ayah in the singular never means a verse. Mufti Abu Layth says he is not against abrogation in principle but that 2:106 does not prove it and that no verse was ever lifted from the Quran. Discussionguest speechEdip Yukselnaskh (abrogation)Quran 4:82 (they would have found many contradictions)Quran 2:106 (we do not abrogate a sign or cause it to be forgotten) machine9 min 12 s59:27on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth If the Quran abolished slavery, why is there no explicit verse saying so? The guest says rabb is used in the Quran only for God, so that owning a slave is shirk and la ilaha illa Allah is itself the abolition of slavery. Mufti Abu Layth notes that rabb has ordinary linguistic uses and that non-Muslims recorded Muslims as owning slaves. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip Yukselrabbabdshirk machine7 min 51 s1:19:08on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What is the miracle of the number 19 in the Quran? The guest says the number 19 proves the Quran is God's word letter by letter and that Muslims otherwise have no objective evidence for its divine origin; he recounts a Turkish scholar insisting the bismillah has twenty-one letters rather than nineteen. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 74:30 (over it are nineteen)bismillahSuleyman Ates [?] machine6 min 34 s1:26:59on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What numerical patterns does the guest find in the Quran's word counts? The guest lists word-frequency symmetries in the Quran, such as dunya and akhirah 115 times each, month twelve times and day 365 times, and says the number 19 is a test that most people fail. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip Yukseldunyaakhirahrasul machine5 min 11 s1:33:33on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How does the guest's number 19 differ from Bible numerics, and how does he read 74:29-31? The guest says 19 is a test most people fail, distinguishes his system from Ivan Panin's Bible numerics, and retranslates 74:29-31 as describing a precise, obvious mathematical structure rather than scorching the skin in hell. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 74:29-31 (lawwaha lil-bashar, over it are nineteen)Ivan PaninRabbi Judah (11th century) [?] machine6 min 30 s1:38:44on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Could the number 19 patterns in the Quran be a coincidence or a human habit? The guest says the 19 structure cannot be chance or subconscious habit, that mathematicians cannot refute it, and that 19 appearing only in chapter 74 and being unveiled in 1974, nineteen times seventy-four lunar years later, is a prophecy. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselRashad KhalifaQuran 74:1-2 (O you who are hidden, rise and warn)abjad numerals machine7 min 43 s1:45:14on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did Rashad Khalifa claim to be a messenger of God? The guest says Rashad Khalifa did claim to be a messenger, not a prophet, commissioned to unveil the miracle of 19, and that the Quran calls Muhammad the last prophet rather than the last messenger. Khalifa held the last two verses of Surat al-Tawba to be interpolations. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselRashad KhalifaQuran 72:26-28 (he reveals the unseen to a messenger he chooses)Quran 40:34 (Joseph came to you before; no messenger after him) [?] machine3 min 55 s1:52:57on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did the number 19 appear in the guest's life before he discovered it in the Quran? Before he knew anything about the number 19 the guest had named his youth activist group FT-19, which he sees as an early connection to the number. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip Yuksel machine2 min 39 s2:02:04on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth LatestDoes the Quran allow a husband to hit his wife? The guest reads 4:34 as telling a persistently flirting wife to leave rather than as permission to beat, and says four words in the verse were mistranslated to create male authority. Mufti Abu Layth says the statement that men provide is descriptive, not prescriptive. Question from live chatguest speechEdip YukselQuran 4:34 (the 'hitting verse')daraba (wadribuhunna)qawwamun machine7 min 49 s2:04:43on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How does the guest translate the verses on cutting off the thief's hand, jizya and polygamy? The guest's translation renders the thief's punishment as cutting off the means, the tax on non-Muslims as war reparations, sa'ihat as women active in society, and polygamy as permitted only for widows with orphans in exigent circumstances. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 5:38 (the thief, cut off their hands)jizyasa'ihat machine3 min 58 s2:12:32on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is seeing the number 19 everywhere a sign or a superstition? The guest rejects personal and anecdotal sightings of 19 as numerology and chance, distinguishing them from the Quran's structure, and invites Zakir Naik and Nouman Ali Khan to debate him. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselZakir NaikNouman Ali Khan machine2 min 40 s2:17:50on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the number 19 structure work in all the readings of the Quran? The guest says the 19 structure is found in the Hafs reading, where it revealed two spelling errors and two added verses, and that the Warsh reading differs little; he also expresses regard for Ghulam Ahmad Parwez. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip Yukselqira'atHafsWarsh machine2 min 35 s2:21:49on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran say the Israelites were slaves in Egypt? A chat question cites 26:22, where Moses says Pharaoh enslaved the Israelites; Mufti Abu Layth says historians describe them as outcast second-class citizens rather than slaves but grants the verse deserves a closer look. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechQuran 26:22 (that you enslaved the Children of Israel)Musa (Moses)Pharaoh machine2 min 32 s2:24:24on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What does Edip Yuksel think of Sam Gerrans? The guest respects Sam Gerrans as articulate but says his failure to see the number 19 leads him to invent arbitrary meanings for the initial letters, and that 19 is a divine test of one's bigotry. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselSam Gerransal-huruf al-muqatta'at (the initial letters)Salih machine2 min 38 s2:26:56on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is al-kitab the same book given to every prophet? The guest says owning a slave is shirk, that kawthar means abundance rather than a pool, and that al-kitab is the one divine law sent to every prophet, whose goal, peacemaking, is secular while iman is distinct. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 108:1 (we have given you al-kawthar)kawtharal-kitab machine2 min 37 s2:29:34on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why were the Israelites told to sacrifice a heifer, and what does it teach about religious detail? The heifer was commanded to break the Israelites' lingering reverence for their Egyptian masters' cow worship, and the rabbis' frivolous questions about it exemplify the clerical obsession with detail. Mufti Abu Layth agrees and recalls arguing the same. Discussionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 2:67-71 (the heifer of the Children of Israel)Musa (Moses)Pharaoh machine2 min 40 s2:36:06on YouTube
26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What does the word salat mean in the Quran according to the Quran-only view? The guest defines salat from the Quran as solidarity rather than ritual: with God, which is remembrance and connection, and with people, which is the secular Friday gathering; the essence is dhikr, not physical form. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechEdip YukselQuran 75:31 (he neither believed nor prayed)Quran 33:56 (Allah and his angels send salat upon the Prophet)Quran 9:103 (take from their wealth a charity and pray for them) machine3 min 54 s2:38:46on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How did Dr Shehzad Saleem come to research the history of the Quran? Teaching the history of the Quran at Al-Mawrid in 1999, the guest was shocked by questions in the Muslim sources themselves: multiple extant readings, reports of a lost rajm verse, compilation by two witnesses, differing companion codices and the Shia account. His book is the result of the quest that followed. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)The History of the Quran: A Critical Study (Shehzad Saleem)Al-MawridHafs machine7 min 36 s4:02on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the Quran preserved exactly as it was revealed? The guest says the Quran is preserved absolutely, dot for dot and in the revealed order, and that the other readings need a separate explanation; preservation in its original language is what distinguishes it from the Bible. His view develops Farahi's thesis as transmitted through Islahi and Ghamidi. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Yasir QadhiJay SmithSalafi machine6 min 33 s13:10on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How was the Quran preserved: by memory or in writing? The Quran was preserved primarily by thousands of companions memorising it and passing it on generation to generation, which is what tawatur means; writing was secondary and always needed a hafiz's testimony. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Hamiduddin FarahiAmin Ahsan IslahiJaved Ahmad Ghamidi machine3 min 55 s17:05on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did the Prophet leave a written Quran, and what did the caliphs really do? At the Prophet's death the Quran lived in the community's recitation, teaching and notes; he deliberately left no official codex. The caliphs merely spread copies, and the guest says the Bukhari narratives about their compilation are weak in chain and content. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)The deen reaches us through continuous living practiceJibril (Gabriel)Abu Bakr machine3 min 57 s21:00on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Where do the variant readings of the Quran come from? The guest says the Quran was revealed chronologically and then recompiled in a new divine order, as 75:16-19 describes; remnants of the earlier recitation kept by the companions are the biggest source of the qira'at. The final order was fixed when the Prophet revised the Quran twice with Jibril in his last Ramadan. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Quran 75:16-19 (upon Us is its collection and its recitation)Hamiduddin Farahiqira'at (the variant readings) machine3 min 57 s24:57on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How did the earlier recitation and other readings get mixed up with the Quran? The guest names four sources of the variant readings: remnants of the earlier revelatory sequence kept by the companions and later blurred with the Quran under al-Shafi'i's scholarly transmission, the mixing of similar passages, companions' explanatory synonyms taken as readings, and fabrication in the second and third centuries. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)al-Shafi'ial-Risalah of al-Shafi'iilm al-khassa (the specialists' knowledge) machine7 min 53 s28:54on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the hadith that the Quran was revealed in seven ahruf authentic, and what does it mean? The guest says the seven-ahruf hadith is ambiguous, as al-Suyuti admitted, that its forty-odd interpretations are inconsistent and its versions unsoundly reported and contradictory, so they cancel each other out. He refrains from guessing what the Prophet originally said. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)report: the quran was revealed in seven ahrufthe seven ahrufal-Suyuti machine5 min 12 s38:06on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why did Muslim scholars record disagreements about the Quran's text rather than hide them? The guest says the scholars transmitted the variant reports out of sheer honesty, just as they preserved and marked scribal errors in the mushaf, and that variation was inevitable once the revealed sequence was rearranged. Mufti Abu Layth notes in passing that he agrees with Ghamidi that there is no second coming of Jesus. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Hisham ibn HakimUmar ibn al-Khattabreport: hisham ibn hakim recited differently and umar disagreed machine5 min 16 s44:35on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What was the qira'a al-'amma, and why does Morocco recite a different reading? The common reading of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali and the companions, al-qira'a al-'amma, is the mushaf we have, while the other readings stayed in scholars' books; Morocco reads Nafi' only because a third-century ruler imposed it on account of Imam Malik's preference. Mufti Abu Layth adds that the early generations were more secure in their faith than later, institutionalised Islam. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)al-qira'a al-'amma (the common reading)Abu Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami [?]Abu Bakr machine5 min 14 s48:32on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth How did the seven canonical readings of the Quran come about? In the second and third centuries leading reciters were given the privilege of ikhtiyar, choosing one of the inherited variants for each verse by their own criteria, and Ibn Mujahid later popularised seven of them. Mufti Abu Layth says he agrees these readings are not mutawatir and not on the level of the common reading. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Abu Bakr ibn Mujahidqira'at (the variant readings)mutawatir (tawatur) machine5 min 16 s53:49on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Why did the reading of Hafs from Asim become the standard Quran? The guest relays Ghamidi's thesis that Hafs alone transmitted the common reading without adding his own choices, so his reading coincides with the original. The seven-ahruf hadith was taken as licence for the reciters' choices, and Ibn Mujahid's seven prevailed through his standing and state position. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)HafsAsim ibn Abi al-Najud (the reciter)Javed Ahmad Ghamidi machine5 min 13 s57:45on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth If Quraysh did not pronounce the hamza, why does the Hafs reading of the Quran? The guest says dialect only changes pronunciation, not the word, and such variation was permitted, while the claim that Quraysh had no hamza is itself unproven. Mufti Abu Layth says he had concluded that the Quran came in a standardised formal Arabic that used the hamza. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Qurayshlahja (dialect, accent)hamza (the glottal stop) machine6 min 31 s1:04:16on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Do the early manuscripts with different words undermine the preservation of the Quran? The guest says such manuscripts were bound to exist once people wrote down the readings, and that a reading needs correct Arabic and a chain to the Prophet, with ijtihad only in preference. Mufti Abu Layth adds that the harshest critics of the readings were Muslim grammarians of Basra such as al-Mazini, until later grammarians like Ibn Malik embraced them. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Quran 1:4 (maliki / malik yawm al-din)masahif (manuscripts)qira'at (the variant readings) machine6 min 30 s1:10:45on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Isn't it too convenient that the one preserved reading is exactly the Hafs Quran we have? Mufti Abu Layth states his own view that the Quran was always dynamic and allowed some flexibility of wording, as Imam Malik and al-Shafi'i held companions could substitute words. The guest answers the convenience objection by saying the reasoning, not the result, should be judged, and that later scholars missed the verses of al-Qiyamah because of a flawed report from Ibn Abbas and a hadith-centric mindset. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Javed Ahmad GhamidiImam Malikal-Shafi'i machine5 min 12 s1:18:35on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Where does the claim that the Quran is preserved to the very dot come from? Mufti Abu Layth says the slogan that the Quran is preserved to the very dot is not traditional but a creed cemented in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when religious people entrenched themselves in fundamentalism against modernity and colonialism. Early Muslims were comfortable with a Quran that was preserved while allowing variation. Discussionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Hamiduddin Farahithe Bible machine3 min 29 s1:21:11on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Is the guest's approach to the Quran's history just confirmation bias? The guest says his questions came from the Muslim sources themselves, not from Western scholars, who have merely extracted the same data from Muslim books. Muslims must answer such questions rather than snub them, since the Quran is a book for all mankind. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)confirmation bias machine2 min 37 s1:24:40on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth If Allah promised to preserve the Quran, why are there variant readings at all? The guest says Allah preserved his part, the real Quran, and left people the discretion that produced the other readings, just as he allowed hadith to be misreported; the test is in seeking the truth through them. Mufti Abu Layth states his own view that the Quran we have is from an umbrella revelation that allowed variations. Question source not recordedguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Quran 15:9 (We sent down the reminder and We are its guardian)qira'at (the variant readings)mutawatir (tawatur) machine3 min 54 s1:27:17on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Was there ever a verse of stoning in the Quran, and does stoning still apply? The guest says Umar's 'verse of rajm' refers to the muharaba verse 5:33, from which exemplary punishment including stoning derives, and that it still applies to extreme crimes under strict conditions. Mufti Abu Layth holds that the Prophet only condoned stoning from Jewish practice until the lashing verse, and that under Maliki scholars like al-Burzuli the hudud change with the age. Question from live chatguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)rajm (stoning)Hamiduddin FarahiQuran 5:33 (the muharaba verse) machine5 min 14 s1:31:11on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does a reciter's chain of teachers back to the Prophet prove the Quran's text? A single chain of huffaz only testifies who taught whom and does not authenticate the text on its own; preservation rests on the vast number of people transmitting the same thing, of which one chain is a drop in the ocean. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)sanad (chain of transmission)ijazah (authorisation to teach)huffaz (memorisers of the Quran) machine1 min 06 s1:36:25on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Was Ibn Mas'ud's Quran different from the Quran we have? No: the guest says the reports that Ibn Mas'ud rejected al-Fatiha or the last two surahs are wrongly ascribed to him, and the major companions vouched for the same Quran, the only traceable dispute being over the word 'qul'. Mufti Abu Layth also says he would not advocate cutting the hand today, since for him the hudud have already changed with the age. Question from live chatguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)Ibn Mas'udUbayy ibn Ka'bIbn Abbas machine3 min 57 s1:37:31on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did the variant readings of the Quran come from missing dots and vowel marks? Partly: the guest says the lack of diacritics let words like ya'lamun and ta'lamun be read either way where both were ascribed to the Prophet, one of several causes he lists. Mufti Abu Layth clarifies that nobody is claiming a verse of rajm exists in the Quran. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)qira'at (the variant readings)rajm (stoning)Quran 5:33 (the muharaba verse) machine1 min 19 s1:41:28on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth In what sense is the Quran a miracle? The guest says the Quran's miracle is linguistic, a composition that cannot be emulated, not mathematical. Mufti Abu Layth adds that for him it is a miracle in the subjective experience of reading it, in its civilisational impact and in its literary symmetry, not in bending the laws of nature or in scientific foreknowledge. Question from live chatguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)dunyaakhirahmiracles never defy God's laws; they have causes within nature machine3 min 56 s1:42:47on YouTube
19 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Which reading of the Quran reached India, Malaysia and Indonesia, and why? The common reading, later called the reading of Hafs, reached the subcontinent and the Far East through the masses, while the other readings took root only where scholars arrived first. Mufti Abu Layth sums up: the Quran is preserved as the qira'a al-'amma of the Prophet's final recitation, and Hafs coincides with it because he made no choices of his own. Question from live chatquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shehzad Saleem (guest)HafsAsim ibn Abi al-Najud (the reciter)al-qira'a al-'amma (the common reading) machine4 min 53 s1:46:43on YouTube
17 Jun 2020video What did Yasir Qadhi say to Mohammed Hijab about the preservation of the Quran? In Mufti Abu Layth's account, Yasir Qadhi said there were 'huge problems' with the preservation of the Quran, discussed only the problem and not the answer, and pointed people to his paid course. Mufti himself says the standard narrative has holes and leaves pressing questions unanswered. Lessonmay contain a quoted viewYasir QadhiMohammed Hijabmushaf machine2 min 36 s0:00on YouTube
17 Jun 2020video What should Yasir Qadhi have said about the preservation of the Quran? Mufti Abu Layth says the mistake was raising the problem in public without any answer: Qadhi should have given some answer, such as saying plainly that the Quran would come out the same as it is today. The fallout, he says, is Qadhi's own fault. LessonYasir QadhiMohammed HijabJay Smithmushaf machine6 min 24 s10:24on YouTube
22 Apr 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Was Jesus born of a virgin, and how could a jinn father a child? Mufti Abu Layth says he has recently become inclined to the view of Abdul Karim Athari and Tamanna Imadi that Jesus was born naturally, since the Quran never explicitly states a virgin birth and 6:101 argues from the absence of a companion. The guest sets that controversy aside and says a jinn, being a different species, could not impregnate a woman. Discussionguest speechDr Shabir Ally (guest)Jesus (Isa)Abdul Karim AthariTamanna Imadi machine3 min 56 s1:25:40on YouTube
22 Apr 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does Surat al-Falaq confirm that black magic is real? The verse about those who blow on knots does not establish that magic is effective: the guest says it asks protection from the fear such practices create, and Mufti Abu Layth says the surah names things not harmful in themselves but the superstitions attached to them. The question whether Islam is feudal went unanswered. Question from live chatguest speechDr Shabir Ally (guest)Quran 113:4 (from the evil of those who blow on knots)sihr (magic) machine2 min 38 s1:40:04on YouTube
22 Apr 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What does the Quran mean by 'what your right hands possess', and did the Prophet have a concubine? The guest reads the Quran's 'right-hand possessions' as a category of wife who was not free, since 4:25 speaks of marrying slave girls, and thinks Mariya al-Qibtiyya may have been a wife misunderstood as a concubine. Mufti Abu Layth says Mariya was a wife, as he has taught, and that under trajectory hermeneutics slavery would have become haram. Question from live chatguest speechDr Shabir Ally (guest)ma malakat aymanukum (what your right hands possess)Ibrahim (Abraham)Hajar machine7 min 13 s1:42:42on YouTube
28 Feb 2020From the Mind of a Mufti What was Fadak and why did it matter? Fadak was fertile land near Khaybar that came to the Prophet as fay', without war, and he used its produce for travellers, his household and public needs. Lessonposition checkedFadakfay' (property gained without fighting)Quran 59:6-7 (what God gave His Messenger without war; the categories of fay')the campaign of Khaybar machine5 min 42 s4:33on YouTube

2019 · 56

31 Dec 2019On the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ Did angels really fight at the Battle of Badr? Mufti Abu Layth says many take the angelic help at Badr as symbolic language for strengthened resolve, and the companions' later descriptions as storytelling or what they felt they saw. Question from live chatposition checkedthe battle of BadrQurayshreport: o allah if this band perishes you will not be worshipped on earthQuran 48:10 (the hand of Allah is over their hands) machine7 min 42 s0:00on YouTube
12 Dec 2019From the Mind of a Mufti Does the Quran forbid Muslims from being friends with non-Muslims who challenge Islam? The verse about not loving those who oppose Allah was revealed when tribes were confederating to attack the Muslims and concerns loyalty to them, not friendship with non-Muslims. Permission to marry Christians and Jews shows love and friendship with non-Muslims are allowed. Lessonposition checkedMohammed HijabQuran 58:22 (you will not find believers loving those who oppose Allah and His Messenger) [?]mawadda (mutual love)reading a verse in the context of its revelation machine3 min 53 s2:40on YouTube
3 Nov 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Quran actually tell women to cover their hair, or only their chest? There is nothing explicit in the Quran or Sunnah about covering the head; the verse of al-Nur tells women to cover the jayb (the chest opening) with the khimar they already wore, and whether the khimar itself is obligatory or circumstantial is an open question. Covering the hair became the settled teaching within a generation of the companions. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 24:31 (let them draw their khimars over their jayb)hijabkhimar (head covering)jayb (the chest opening of a garment) machine9 min 06 s0:04on YouTube
3 Nov 2019Responding to Refutations Does the Quran say Jesus was born of a virgin? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran does not explicitly state a virgin birth, citing recent scholars who read Mary's glad tidings like those given to Ibrahim and Zakariyya. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Ibrahim (Abraham) machine5 min 03 s28:07on YouTube
3 Nov 2019Responding to Refutations Is it inconsistent to reinterpret Gog and Magog by geography but not other beliefs by science? Mufti Abu Layth says Qadhi calls him a heretic for revisiting interpretations on grounds of science and reason, yet revisits Gog and Magog on grounds of geography with his own teacher's precedent, which he calls hypocrisy. LessonYasir QadhiYa'juj and Ma'juj (Gog and Magog)Abd al-Rahman al-Sa'di [?]Tamanna Imadi [?] machine7 min 29 s33:10on YouTube
3 Nov 2019Responding to Refutations Can old interpretations of the Quran be revisited, and what role does reason play? Mufti Abu Layth says long-standing interpretations that are not the Quran's clear expression may be revisited and that reason has primacy, but one must not condemn others for doing what one does oneself. Lessonposition checkedaql (reason)deen machine1 min 47 s46:59on YouTube
18 Oct 2019From the Mind of a Mufti What does Mufti Abu Layth think of Mufti Menk? Mixed: Menk fills a real demand for simple, uplifting stories and is likeable and funny, but Mufti Abu Layth says such preachers spread inauthentic stories and cement false beliefs, and he suspects Menk is less strict than he portrays himself. Question from live chatMufti MenkNuh (Noah)the flood of Nuh machine9 min 15 s0:02on YouTube
18 Oct 2019Hadith Studies Did the Prophet really split the moon in half? No: Mufti Abu Layth says the moon was not split; the companions described what they perceived, most likely a lunar eclipse, and Quran 54:1 is about the end of the world. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 54:1 (the Hour has drawn near and the moon has split)the splitting of the moonreport: the moon was split in two in the time of the prophetIbn Abbas [?] machine2 min 15 s0:40on YouTube
11 Oct 2019From the Mind of a Mufti Is a prayer mark on the forehead a sign of piety in Islam? A burn mark on the forehead from prostration has nothing to do with Islam and is not a sign of piety. The verse about the believers' mark on their faces refers to a glow of commitment, and an early report rebukes a man who bore such a mark. Question source not recordedposition checkedQuran 48:29 (their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration) [?]al-Qurtubireport: i have reached eighty years and met the companions none of them had this mark on the forehead have the foreheads become heavier or has the earth become harshersujud machine4 min 09 s0:01on YouTube
28 Sep 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran If some hadith are unreliable, doesn't that make the Quran unreliable too? No: the Quran was passed on en masse as a recited living tradition, so doubts about particular hadith chains do not carry over to it. Question raised by Mufti Abu Laythposition checkedSahih al-BukhariDawah Man [?]the living traditiontarawih machine7 min 37 s1:58on YouTube
28 Sep 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why the Quran could not be corrupted like hadith, and the fashion for chains Corrupting the Quran was next to impossible because it was recited en masse everywhere; hadith, written down a century later, were easy to fabricate, and chains for the Quran came later as a fashion. Lessonposition checkedthe 'Satanic Verses' (gharaniq) incidentUmar ibn Abd al-Azizisnad (chain of transmission)ijazah (authorisation to teach, with a chain) machine10 min 59 s12:47on YouTube
14 Sep 2019video How do I answer Christians who say the Quran could be corrupted like the Bible? Earlier revelation was not like the Quran: the Quran is a recitation meant to be preserved word for word, while the Torah was a message and laws and the Injil was the good news Jesus preached. Question from live chatposition checkedwahy (revelation)Quran (recitation)Quran 12:2 [?]Torah machine8 min 16 s0:39on YouTube
14 Sep 2019video Is the Bible corrupted? Yes, if corrupted means not preserved word for word, since they were never meant to be a recitation; but the general message of Jesus was most likely kept. Lessonposition checkedInjil (Gospel)Isa (Jesus)the Bible machine3 min 04 s8:17on YouTube
14 Sep 2019video If God knew earlier scriptures would change, why not send the Quran first? The earlier prophets were sent only to the Israelites and their books were never meant to be preserved word for word, so the question rests on a misunderstanding. Question from live chatposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Musa (Moses)Bani Isra'il (the Israelites) machine1 min 55 s11:21on YouTube
21 Aug 2019From the Mind of a Mufti Is the Quran's description of paradise and hell literal or symbolic? Mufti Abu Layth reads the Quran's imagery of the afterlife as symbolic, chosen to resonate with the people it was revealed to, while holding that life continues after this world. Allah also describes himself in imagery, and people are free to disagree. Lessonposition checkedQuran 24:35 (Allah is the light of the heavens and the earth)report: not a single human could ever conceptualise the afterlifeIbn Rushd (Averroes)Ibn Arabi machine6 min 32 s2:38on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What is the iddah after divorce and why does the Quran require it? The iddah is a waiting period of one to three cycles after a divorce which establishes whether the woman is pregnant and prevents suspicion and conflict, and during it she keeps the right to stay in the home. Mufti Abu Layth reads this as the opening of the passage the objector quotes from. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:1 (when you divorce women, divorce them for their iddah; do not expel them from their homes)iddah (waiting period after divorce)talaq (divorce)juz machine3 min 54 s6:26on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What does the Quran say about how a divorce should end and about a divorced woman's future? At the end of the iddah the couple must either reconcile or part with kindness before witnesses, and Mufti Abu Layth reads the promise that God makes a way out and provides from unexpected places as reassurance to the vulnerable party that she need not accept oppression for shelter. The objector, he says, skips all of this. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:2 (retain them or part with them with kindness, and call witnesses; whoever fears Allah, He makes a way out)Quran 65:3 (He provides from where one does not expect; whoever relies on Allah, He is sufficient)iddah (waiting period after divorce)talaq (divorce) machine5 min 13 s10:20on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What does Quran 65:4 say about the waiting period for women whose periods have stopped? Women who have despaired of menstruation wait three months, a rule Mufti Abu Layth reads as addressed to men who are unsure whether a woman has reached the menopause, so that pregnancy can be excluded; the pregnant wait until childbirth. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)iddah (waiting period after divorce)mahid (menstruation) machine2 min 36 s15:33on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does 'those who have not menstruated' in Quran 65:4 refer to little girls? No: Mufti Abu Layth says the phrase refers to women whose cycles are absent through illness or irregularity, as Abu Hayyan, Ibn Ashur, al-Samarqandi, Abu al-Su'ud and Ibn Atiyya read it. Al-Tha'labi records that the verse was revealed about a man who divorced his wife during her menses. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)iddah (waiting period after divorce)Abu Hayyan al-AndalusiIbn Ashur machine3 min 57 s18:09on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did classical scholars really say Quran 65:4 includes little girls? Yes, some did: Mufti Abu Layth concedes that commentators such as Ibn Kathir and al-Qurtubi wrote that the phrase can include little girls, which he condemns as a mistake. He says their saying so is not the Quran saying so, and the evidence lies in how the passage opens. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)Ibn Kathiral-QurtubiIbn al-Qayyim [?] machine2 min 37 s22:06on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the word 'women' in Surah al-Talaq rule out children? Yes: the passage opens with nisa, women, a word never used of a six- or seven-year-old, just as boys are never called rijal, and the verses go on to envisage pregnancy, which nobody would expect of a child. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:1 (when you divorce women, divorce them for their iddah; do not expel them from their homes)Quran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)nisa (women)rijal (men) machine2 min 36 s24:43on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Imam Malik allow marriage to be consummated with a girl who was not yet nubile? No: Mufti Abu Layth says Imam Malik's fatwa was clear that sexual relations with a wife are haram unless she is nubile. Scholars who read 65:4 to include girls were men influenced by the patriarchy of their age and were wrong, while others such as Ibn Ashur, al-Samarqandi, Abu Hayyan and al-Alusi did not read it so. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)Imam MalikfatwaIbn Ashur machine2 min 39 s27:19on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran How does the rule that a clear verse overrides an ambiguous one apply to Quran 65:4? By a principle of usul the ambiguous phrase 'those who have not menstruated' is read in the light of the clear opening term women, which cancels any reading that includes girls. The Quran could have said fatayat but addressed them as nisa. Lessonposition checkedQuran 65:1 (when you divorce women, divorce them for their iddah; do not expel them from their homes)Quran 65:4 (those who have despaired of menstruation, if you are in doubt, their iddah is three months, and those who have not menstruated; the pregnant until they give birth)nisa (women)mutashabih (ambiguous text) machine2 min 38 s29:58on YouTube
8 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is the story of Hajar running seven times between Safa and Marwa true? Mufti Abu Layth thinks the story of Hajar running seven times between Safa and Marwa was most likely added later to give the ritual an Abrahamic link, though he believes the Zamzam story is true. The Quran mentions Safa and Marwa only as a remembrance of God, without linking them to Hajar or Abraham. Question from live chatposition checkedHajarIsmailIbrahim (Abraham)the Ghassanids machine9 min 08 s15:38on YouTube
8 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did the Prophet restore the original rituals of Ibrahim at the Kaaba? No: nothing was in Makkah when Ibrahim arrived, and although he and Ismail built the house of remembrance, Safa and Marwa are never linked to him. The Quran presents them only as symbols for remembering God, so there is no point guessing at older origins. Question from live chatposition checkedIbrahim (Abraham)IsmailQuran 2:127 (Ibrahim and Ismail raising the foundations of the House)Quran 2:158 (Safa and Marwa are among the symbols of Allah) machine1 min 56 s24:46on YouTube
10 May 2019video What does the word nikah actually mean? Linguistically nikah means sex; technically it is the marriage contract, a relationship of exclusivity with mutual rights. Lessonposition checkednikah machine3 min 48 s5:09on YouTube
10 May 2019video Does Quran 60:10 mean a marriage to a non-Muslim is automatically void? No: Umar divorced his non-Muslim wives after the verse came down, which shows their marriages had been valid. The verse on the emigrant women was specific to the Hudaybiyya context. Lessonposition checkedQuran 60:10 (do not hold on to ties with disbelieving women)Umar ibn al-KhattabQurayba bint Abi UmayyaUmm Kulthum bint Jarwal [?] machine3 min 56 s33:03on YouTube
4 May 2019On Current Events Does a hadith tell women to pray in a closet? No: the word makhda' means an inner sleeping chamber, not a closet, and such rooms were dark only because houses had no lamps. Lessonposition checkedDaniel Haqiqatjoumakhda' (inner chamber)Aishareport: the houses in those days had no lamps (Aisha) machine3 min 53 s5:33on YouTube
4 May 2019On Current Events Musaylima, Sajah and the poem that shows what makhda' means Musaylima's poem to the false prophetess Sajah uses makhda' for a bedchamber, showing the word never meant a cupboard. LessonMusaylimaSajahAbu Bakrmakhda' (inner chamber) machine5 min 45 s9:26on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What are the Sana'a manuscripts and how were they discovered? The Sana'a manuscripts are parchment pages of the Quran, including much of Surat al-Tawba, found in the 1970s in the loft of a mosque dome in Sana'a, where old sacred texts had been stored and forgotten. Storing texts this way was a common practice. Lessonthe discovery of the Sana'a manuscripts (1970s) machine2 min 36 s0:00on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why does the Sana'a manuscript have two layers of text? The Sana'a parchment is a reused sheet: an earlier Quranic text was wiped and written over, as was common before paper, and modern imaging has recovered the lower text. That lower text differs in some ways from the Quran as read today. Lessonthe discovery of the Sana'a manuscripts (1970s)palimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine2 min 34 s2:36on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Who has studied the Sana'a palimpsest and what is the controversy about? The Sana'a manuscript is a palimpsest studied by the Puins, Asma Hilali, Sadeghi and Goudarzi, and people online have used it to claim that the Quran Muslims have is not the original. Mufti Abu Layth sets out to answer that claim. Lessonpalimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest)Gerd Puin [?]Elisabeth Puin [?]Asma Hilali machine2 min 37 s5:10on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Sana'a manuscript show that the Quran was changed? The Sana'a manuscript and others such as the Birmingham manuscript date to the first century of Islam, when the Quran was the one text Muslims documented and taught everywhere. The Quran was too widespread and too distinctive in style to corrupt profitably, which is why fabrication targeted hadith instead. Lessonposition checkedElisabeth Puin [?]Behnam Sadeghi [?]Mohsen Goudarzi [?]Asma Hilali machine5 min 15 s7:47on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did the companions ever read or understand the Quran differently from each other? Muslims already accept that the Quran was revealed with fluidity: the Prophet approved different recitations, and the tradition openly records companions such as Ibn Mas'ud holding mistaken views about what was part of the Quran and pronouncing letters by their tribal dialect. None of this is a shock to Muslims. Lessonposition checkedreport: two companions recited differently and the prophet said both are correct the quran is read in several waysIbn Mas'ud [?]qunut (the supplication Ibn Mas'ud took for Quran)al-mu'awwidhatayn (the two surahs of seeking refuge) machine3 min 54 s13:02on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why might an early Arab have written a Quranic word differently? The companions spoke classical Arabic as their everyday language, so substituting a word from memory was far easier for them than for later Muslims who memorise Quranic Arabic as a separate language. Tribal pronunciation differences were known and are not the issue; the general transmission is. Lesson machine2 min 38 s16:56on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Was the Sana'a palimpsest an official copy of the Quran or someone's personal notes? The lower text contains notes such as 'do not say bismillah here' before Surat al-Tawba, which shows it was someone's personal script, as Asma Hilali argues, and not a standard copy sent out to communities. Mufti Abu Layth finds no evidence for the Puins' view that it was official. Lessonposition checkedAsma HilaliGerd Puin [?]palimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine2 min 33 s19:34on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What are the differences between the Sana'a lower text and today's Quran? The lower text differs from today's Quran in twenty to thirty mostly small ways, such as a missing word or a changed pronoun. Mufti Abu Layth's assessment is that it is one person's, possibly a companion's, personal notes written from a mistaken or personal reading. Lessonposition checkedpalimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine2 min 36 s22:07on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran How did Uthman standardise the Quran, and does that explain the Sana'a text? Uthman locked in one reading in an undotted script that still allowed the known variant readings, so the lower text is either a person's mistaken note or, less likely, a reading not locked in at that time. Mufti Abu Layth prefers the first, as simple human error from memory. Lessonposition checkedUthman ibn Affanqira'at (the seven or ten readings)the Uthmanic mushaf machine3 min 56 s24:43on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Sana'a manuscript prove the Quran evolved over time? The discrepancies in the Sana'a text are petty changes of pronouns and dropped words that serve no purpose, so they cannot be a deliberate evolution of the Quran, which nobody would have risked his life for. They are most likely a writer's mistaken notes. Lessonposition checkedElisabeth Puin [?]palimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine3 min 56 s28:39on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Sana'a manuscript support or undermine the Muslim account of the Quran's history? The Sana'a find confirms the traditional account: a first-century Quran, companions who sometimes erred as the hadith say, and Uthman's standardisation of one reading. The largest discrepancy is a dropped word that exists elsewhere in the Quran. Lessonposition checkedUthman ibn AffanThe deen reaches us through continuous living practicepalimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine4 min 08 s32:35on YouTube
23 Feb 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Jesus really speak as a baby in the cradle? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran does not say Jesus spoke as a baby; the Maryam passage most likely refers to Jesus at twelve debating the priests in the Temple, as in Luke. Question from live chatposition checkedQuran 3:46 (he will speak to people in the cradle and in maturity)Quran 19:27-33 (Mary brings Jesus to her people; he speaks from the cradle)Isa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary) machine13 min 55 s1:15on YouTube
23 Feb 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What does it mean that Jesus spoke to people in the cradle and in old age? Mufti Abu Layth says the verse means Jesus would relate to people of every age when he preached, not that he spoke as a baby; that story likely came from apocryphal infancy gospels. Lessonposition checkedQuran 3:46 (he will speak to people in the cradle and in maturity)Isa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Infancy Gospel of Thomas machine3 min 37 s13:57on YouTube
14 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Who was al-Khidr and why is he called the green one? Al-Khidr is a figure of Islamic literature and folk belief whose name means the green one, said to be because the ground turned green where he sat. Earlier scholars preferred the pronunciation al-Khadir. Lessonal-KhidrMulla Ali al-Qarial-Qari's treatise on al-Khidr [?]Hanafi school machine2 min 35 s0:00on YouTube
14 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What happened between Musa and al-Khidr in Surat al-Kahf? Musa and his companion travel to the meeting of two seas, meet a servant of Allah who damages a ship, kills a boy and repairs a wall, and is rebuked by Musa each time. Al-Bukhari's hadith adds the detail that Musa had claimed to be the most knowledgeable of people. LessonQuran 18:60-82 (Musa and the servant of Allah)Musa (Moses)al-KhidrYusha ibn Nun (Joshua) machine5 min 47 s2:35on YouTube
14 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Was the story of Musa and al-Khidr a dream? Mufti Abu Layth reads everything after Musa and his companion fell asleep at the rock as a vision, which explains its strange details. Scholars who read it literally struggled to explain them. Lessonposition checkedMusa (Moses)Yusha ibn Nun (Joshua)al-KhidrQuran 18:60-82 (Musa and the servant of Allah) machine5 min 40 s8:22on YouTube
14 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is al-Khidr a prophet, and is he still alive? Classical scholars disagreed on whether al-Khidr was a prophet or a saint, and many held he is still alive while others denied it. Mufti Abu Layth likens the stories of his appearances to saint legends in other religions. Lessonquoted view, not his positional-KhidrIbn al-JawziIbn Ishaqal-Baghawi [?] machine8 min 46 s14:02on YouTube
14 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is al-Khidr a real person who is still alive? No: he reads al-Khidr as part of a vision shown to Musa, whose three events mirrored Musa's own life and mission. The boy was not really killed, and al-Khidr does not roam the earth. Lessonposition checkedal-KhidrMusa (Moses)Pharaohthe golden calf of the Israelites machine6 min 19 s22:48on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran How should Muslims read the stories in the Quran? Quranic stories can be read as narrative and for lessons, but where they suggest the supernatural we must ask how to read them, unlike myths we never take as real. Lessonposition checkedQuran 12:3 (We relate to you the best of stories)Yusuf (Joseph)Prometheus (Greek myth)Pandora (Greek myth) machine9 min 32 s1:57on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran If God can do anything, why not take the miracles in Quranic stories literally? Reading the stories as suspensions of natural law means ditching reason, which leaves no ground to reject any myth; reason must be all in, though the prophets were real people. Lessonposition checkedIsa (Jesus)the TrinityQuran 35:43 (you will never find any change in the way of God) [?]Adam machine6 min 26 s9:32on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Quran criticise the Queen of Sheba for ruling over men? No: the Quran portrays her as a woman of great power over male ministers and never rebukes her for it. Lessonposition checkedthe Queen of ShebaSulayman (Solomon)Quran 27:23 (I found a woman ruling over them, given of everything, with a mighty throne)hudhud (hoopoe) machine2 min 32 s15:58on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Was the hoopoe in the story of Sulayman really a bird? Probably not, in his reading: the Arabic used of it is used only for humans, so the tafsir that it was one of Sulayman's intelligence agents makes sense. Lessonposition checkedhudhud (hoopoe)Sulayman (Solomon)Maulana Abdul Karim Athari [?]Tafsir Urwat al-Wuthqa [?] (Abdul Karim Athari) machine6 min 24 s18:30on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What does the Quran say about kings in the story of Sheba? The Queen's saying that kings ruin the towns they enter raises the question of what gives anyone the right to rule others. Lessonposition checkedthe Queen of ShebaSulayman (Solomon)Quran 27:34 (kings, when they enter a town, ruin it) machine2 min 34 s24:54on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did a jinn really bring the Queen of Sheba's throne to Sulayman? Mufti Abu Layth doubts it: following Athari's tafsir, the 'jinn' here were a division of Sulayman's forces, one of three branches of his state. Lessonposition checkedSulayman (Solomon)the Queen of ShebaMaulana Abdul Karim Athari [?]Tafsir Urwat al-Wuthqa [?] (Abdul Karim Athari) machine6 min 26 s27:28on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Prophet Sulayman steal the Queen of Sheba's throne? No: he reads the story as Sulayman having a grander replica made from a detailed description, since prophets do not steal thrones. Lessonposition checkedSulayman (Solomon)the Queen of ShebaMaulana Abdul Karim Athari [?]Tafsir Urwat al-Wuthqa [?] (Abdul Karim Athari) machine6 min 57 s33:54on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran What happened when the Queen of Sheba came to Sulayman? She was shown a throne grander than hers in a mere waiting room and humbled, then became Muslim; her uncovering her legs on the glass floor was no obscenity. Lessonposition checkedthe Queen of ShebaSulayman (Solomon)Quran 27:42 (is your throne like this? it is as though it were)Quran 27:44 (enter the palace; she thought it a pool and uncovered her shins) machine4 min 18 s40:51on YouTube
8 Jan 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Jesus really speak as a baby in the cradle? Mufti Abu Layth reads it as Jesus aged about twelve debating the Temple elders, as in the Gospel of Luke, which fits the history better than a speaking baby. Lessonposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Maryam (Mary)Quran 19:27-33 (Mary brings him to her people; how can we speak to one in the cradle)Quran 9:92 (those who came to you to be carried, i.e. given mounts) machine10 min 10 s45:09on YouTube

2018 · 47

24 Dec 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran The story of Musa and the servant of Allah in Surah al-Kahf and al-Bukhari Mufti Abu Layth outlines the story of Musa and the servant of Allah from Surah al-Kahf 18:60 onwards and its fuller telling in al-Bukhari's hadith 4725. LessonQuran 18:60 (Musa sets out for the meeting of the two seas)Musa (Moses)Yusha ibn Nun (Joshua)al-Khidr (the servant of Allah; name garbled in the transcript) [?] machine5 min 30 s0:01on YouTube
24 Dec 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did the journey of Musa and Khidr really happen, or was it a vision? Mufti Abu Layth holds that everything after Musa and Joshua slept at the rock happened in a vision, which explains the story's strange shifts. Lessonposition checkedMusa (Moses)Yusha ibn Nun (Joshua)al-Khidr (the servant of Allah; name garbled in the transcript) [?] machine5 min 51 s5:31on YouTube
24 Dec 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why did Khidr kill the boy in Surah al-Kahf? Mufti Abu Layth reads the ship, the boy and the wall as a vision mirroring Musa's mission; no child was really killed, since God would never allow that. Lessonposition checkedMusa (Moses)Bani Isra'il (the Israelites)the golden calf of the IsraelitesDawud (David) machine5 min 18 s11:22on YouTube
24 Dec 2018From the Mind of a Mufti What does it mean that Allah performs salah upon the Prophet? Wood kept asking to whom Allah prays if He 'performs salah' on the Prophet, which Hijab answered well as sending blessings. Mufti Abu Layth says pressing a linguistic point after it was answered, without knowing Arabic, was pathetic. LessonMohammed HijabDavid WoodQuran 33:56 (Allah and His angels perform salah upon the Prophet) [?]salah machine2 min 05 s9:11on YouTube
20 Dec 2018From the Mind of a Mufti Is homosexuality haram in Islam, and why were the people of Lut destroyed? Mufti Abu Layth accepts the majority view that homosexual acts are haram, but says the punishments scholars assigned were variable public-order measures that changed over time, that the people of Lut were destroyed primarily for rejecting their prophet, and that the ruling does not require hatred of homosexual people. Lessonposition checkedIbn HazmTawq al-HamamaImam Malikal-Mudawwana machine4 min 50 s18:27on YouTube
6 Dec 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Quran support human evolution? Mufti Abu Layth reads several verses as arguing for evolution and says Eve is not named in the Quran. No one has to accept evolution, but those who do should not be called heretics. Lessonposition checkedQuran 71:14 (He created you in stages)Quran 71:17 (Allah grew you from the earth like plants)Quran 21:30 (the heavens and earth were one; every living thing from water)Quran 3:59 (the likeness of Jesus is that of Adam) machine9 min 49 s0:00on YouTube
10 Nov 2018From the Mind of a Mufti Did Adam come from Neanderthals? No: Neanderthals were cousins of Homo sapiens, not ancestors. He believes Adam was the father of the cognitive revolution about 70,000 years ago. Question source not recordedposition checkedAbd al-Sabur Shahin [?]AdamThe Knowledge Illusion (called 'the illusion of knowledge') [?]Aristotle machine7 min 10 s0:01on YouTube
25 Oct 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why does the Quran call Jesus the Word of God and mention the Holy Spirit with him? The Quran uses terms of Jesus that it uses of no other prophet, the Word of God and the Holy Spirit, which Muslims do not take literally. He suggests this Christian rhetoric was perhaps meant to build bridges with Christians. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiIsa (Jesus)Quran 3:45 (a word from Him, the Messiah Jesus son of Mary; he cites it as 3:43)Quran 4:171 (the Messiah, messenger of Allah and His word; he cites it as 4:170) machine6 min 28 s0:05on YouTube
25 Oct 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Quran actually say Mary had a virgin birth? No verse of the Quran directly says Jesus was born of a virgin; a verse implies it, and Muslims have differed on it. Mary was married, is never called the Virgin Mary in Islam, and most likely did not remain a virgin all her life. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiMaryam (Mary)Isa (Jesus)Gospel of Luke machine5 min 10 s6:33on YouTube
25 Oct 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran What verses do Muslims use to argue Jesus had a natural birth with a father? The Quran implies a virgin conception but never states it, and the scholars who held Jesus had a father argue from 6:85-87 and 6:101. People may believe either, but calling those scholars deviant is a huge stretch. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiQuran 66:12 (Mary who guarded her chastity; we breathed into it of our spirit)Quran 4:24 (al-muhsanat, the married women)Quran 19:16-22 (the annunciation to Mary) machine8 min 40 s11:43on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations What are the three points of Yasir Qadhi's khutbah on orthodoxy, and is hadith certain knowledge? The khutbah's three points are that reinterpreting the Quran through reason or science is heresy, that doubting the hadith sources is heresy, and that a radical new interpretation amounts to claiming prophethood. Mufti Abu Layth agrees that rejecting hadith wholesale is wrong but says the hadith quoted for it is weak and that hadith is khabar ahad, not certain knowledge. Lessonposition checkedYasir Qadhireport: the hadith of al-irbad ibn sariya in abu dawud (unresolved; content not stated, called weak)Sunan Abi DawudSahih al-Bukhari machine6 min 33 s3:53on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Is Yasir Qadhi's case for reading the Quran literally consistent? The khutbah is internally inconsistent: it allows the Quran to unlock new meanings while condemning new interpretations, and it demands literal reading while itself reading 'the hand of God' non-literally as God's mercy. LessonYasir Qadhireport: yad allah maa al-jamaah the hand of god is with the congregation (unresolved) machine3 min 56 s10:26on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations What did Yasir Qadhi write in the leaked emails about the Quran's preservation and the theological schools? In emails leaked by Dawah Man, Qadhi wrote that the letter-for-letter account of the Quran's preservation cannot stand and proposed discarding the theological schools to rethink kalam from scratch. Mufti Abu Layth reads this as a radical reinterpretation from the man now condemning them. Lessonquoted view, not his positionYasir QadhiDawah MankalamAsh'ari machine3 min 59 s24:51on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Does the Quran say Ibrahim was thrown into the fire, or that the table was sent down to Jesus's disciples? No verse of the Quran says that Ibrahim was thrown into the fire or that the table came down to the disciples, and 'incline them towards you' is the literal wording of 2:260. These are readings of the text as it stands, and calling those who hold them deviants is unacceptable. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiQuran 2:260 (the four birds)Abu Muslim al-Isfahani [?]Quran 21:68-71 (burn him; O fire be cool; we saved him and Lut) machine11 min 44 s31:27on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Why does the Quran call Jesus the Word of God and speak of the Holy Spirit? The Quran applies to Jesus terms it uses of no other prophet, the Word of God and the Holy Spirit, which Muslims do not read literally. Mufti Abu Layth suggests this Christian rhetoric may have been meant to build bridges with Christians. Lessonposition checkedQuran 3:45 (a word from Him, the Messiah Jesus son of Mary; he cites it as 3:43) [?]Quran 4:171 (the Messiah, messenger of Allah and His word; he cites it as 4:170) [?]Quran 2:87 (we helped him with the Holy Spirit)Quran 2:253 (we gave him clear signs and helped him with the Holy Spirit) machine6 min 36 s43:11on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Does the Quran say Jesus was born of a virgin? No verse of the Quran states that Jesus's birth was a virgin birth, only implies it, and Muslim scholars have differed on it. Mary is never called the Virgin Mary in Islam; she was married, and some scholars held that she conceived naturally. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiGospel of LukeGospel of MatthewGospel of Mark machine5 min 11 s49:47on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Which verses are used to argue that Jesus had a father, and does the Quran rule it out? The Quranic account of Mary implies a virgin conception but does not state it, and 66:12 is not read literally by anyone, so demanding literal reading everywhere is inconsistent. The scholars who held Jesus had a father argue from 6:85-87 and 6:101, and calling them deviants is a huge stretch. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiQuran 66:12 (Mary who guarded her chastity; we breathed into it of our spirit)Quran 4:24 (al-muhsanat, the married women)Quran 19:16-22 (the annunciation to Mary) machine7 min 51 s54:58on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Is evolution compatible with the Quran? The Quran's verses on creation in stages, growth from the earth, the single self and the couple of 7:189 are reconcilable with evolution, which Mufti Abu Layth calls a scientific fact established through genetics. Hawwa is not named in the Quran, and those who accept evolution should not be called deviants. Lessonposition checkedYasir QadhiQuran 71:14 (He created you in stages)Quran 71:17 (Allah grew you from the earth like plants)Quran 21:30 (the heavens and earth were one; every living thing from water) machine10 min 29 s1:02:49on YouTube
20 Oct 2018Responding to Refutations Is a new interpretation of the Quran the same as claiming to be a new prophet? Equating a new interpretation with a claim to prophethood is out of order, since the Salafi movement itself is a radical reinterpretation that rejects the majority and holds that God has a leg and a foot. The majority of Muslims have always accepted metaphor in the Quran. Lessonposition checkedYasir Qadhireport: yad allah maa al-jamaah the hand of god is with the congregation (unresolved)Salafi (Wahhabi)madhhab machine3 min 49 s1:19:53on YouTube
1 Sep 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari Does Sahih al-Bukhari say the Prophet forgot verses of the Quran and that there was a verse of stoning? Two Bukhari reports have the Prophet forgetting a verse of the Quran and Umar speaking of a verse of stoning that they used to recite. Mufti Abu Layth says there is no such verse, that this disrespects Umar and the Prophet, and that it implies the Quran has changed. Lessonposition checkedSahih al-Bukhari 2655 (he reminded me of a verse I had forgotten)Sahih al-Bukhari 6830 (Umar's speech on the verse of stoning)Sahih al-BukhariUmar ibn al-Khattab machine5 min 13 s5:10on YouTube
1 Sep 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari Why does Mufti Abu Layth reject the Bukhari report of Sulayman and the hundred women? The report of Sulayman going to a hundred women in one night is absurd and disrespects a prophet, and its moral that God punished him with a disabled child paints a troubling picture of God. A report that clashes with reason, the Quran or Islamic principles goes out of the window. Lessonposition checkedSahih al-Bukhari 2819 (Sulayman: tonight I will go to a hundred women)Sahih al-BukhariSulayman (Solomon)Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Farabri machine3 min 55 s18:15on YouTube
1 Sep 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari What does the Bukhari report that Shaytan touches every newborn except Mary and Jesus mean? The Bukhari report that Shaytan touches every newborn except Mary and Jesus makes even the Prophet Muhammad subject to the devil's touch while exempting the two figures of Christian doctrine, which Mufti Abu Layth presents as a Christian idea in the collection. LessonSahih al-Bukhari 3431 (no child is born without Shaytan touching him, except Mary and her son)Sahih al-BukhariAbu al-YamanMaryam (Mary) machine2 min 38 s26:05on YouTube
31 Aug 2018From the Mind of a Mufti An imam faking his tarawih recitation: a memory from Mufti Abu Layth's hifz days A personal story: as a teenager memorising the Quran, Mufti Abu Layth caught a village imam faking his tarawih recitation and told him privately that misleading people with the Quran was wrong. Otherhifztarawihjuz'Wahhabi machine13 min 18 s0:00on YouTube
11 Aug 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did the Prophet Nuh really live for 950 years? Nuh did not literally live 950 years, Mufti Abu Layth says. The verse's use of two different words for year, sana and 'am, is deliberate and not just rhetorical variation. Lessonposition checkedQuran 29:14Nuh (Noah)sana (year)'am (year) machine3 min 53 s0:00on YouTube
11 Aug 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why do ancient texts say people lived for hundreds or thousands of years? The enormous reigns in the Sumerian king lists reflect a different counting system, likely based on sixty, and the numbers shorten after the flood. Mufti Abu Layth believes the Old Testament's long lifespans were inherited from this Babylonian material. Lessonposition checkedQuran 29:14Nuh (Noah)Gilgameshthe Old Testament machine5 min 16 s3:53on YouTube
11 Aug 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why does the Quran call the ruler in Yusuf's story a king but Musa's a Pharaoh? The thousand sana follow the counting of Nuh's own people and the fifty 'am are years as we count them. The Quran relates narratives in the terms of their own time, as when Yusuf's ruler is a king and Musa's is Pharaoh. Lessonposition checkedQuran 29:14Nuh (Noah)Yusuf (Joseph)Musa (Moses) machine3 min 08 s9:09on YouTube
2 Jul 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Are the descriptions of paradise in the Quran meant literally? The afterlife is real, but he believes the Quran's imagery of paradise was an encouragement suited to its first audience rather than a literal description. Anyone who takes it literally is free to do so. Question source not recordedposition checkedjannah (Paradise)report: no human can ever conceptualise jannahQuran 3:7 (clear and ambiguous verses)mutashabihat (ambiguous texts) machine5 min 03 s0:00on YouTube
29 May 2018Islamic Eschatology What does the Quran say about the beast of the earth? Mufti Abu Layth reads 27:80-84 as moving from the grave to the Day of Judgment, with the creature of verse 82 set within that sequence. Lessonposition checkedQuran 27:80-84Quran 27:82 (we will bring out for them a creature from the earth) machine3 min 10 s3:55on YouTube
29 May 2018Islamic Eschatology Does Ibn Ashur say the beast comes before the Day of Judgment? Mufti Abu Layth reads Ibn Ashur as treating the time from the world's end to the resurrection as one realm, not as placing the beast before the Day of Judgment. Lessonposition checkedIbn Ashural-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir)Quran 27:82 (we will bring out for them a creature from the earth)al-Qurtubi [?] machine4 min 31 s10:59on YouTube
29 May 2018Islamic Eschatology Ibn Ashur: the creature speaks to the deniers at the gathering In Ibn Ashur's reading, as Mufti Abu Layth presents it, the creature speaks at the gathering on the Day of Judgment to shame the Quraysh who denied the Prophet. Lessonquoted view, not his positionIbn Ashural-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir (Ibn Ashur's tafsir)Quran 27:82 (we will bring out for them a creature from the earth)Quraysh machine3 min 55 s15:30on YouTube
26 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is it possible for Prophet Yunus to have survived inside a whale? Highly unlikely but not impossible: the Quran describes no superhuman feat, only that he was swallowed and thrown out very sick. Lessonposition checkedYunus (Jonah)Quran 37:142 (the fish swallowed him while he was blameworthy)Quran 37:145 (We cast him onto the open shore while he was sick)the Bible machine4 min 56 s0:00on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does Islam punish someone for leaving the faith? Islam gives freedom of belief: the Quran says there is no compulsion in religion and leaves belief to choice, and neither the Quran nor the established Sunnah says an apostate must be killed. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:256 (there is no compulsion in religion)Quran 18:29 (whoever wishes, let him believe, and whoever wishes, let him disbelieve)Quran 10:99 (would you compel people to become believers?)Quran 109:1-6 (Surah al-Kafirun: to you your religion and to me mine) machine5 min 16 s0:00on YouTube
20 Apr 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Musa's staff really turn into a snake? No: Mufti Abu Layth holds the staff was described as moving as though it were a snake, while the magicians' sticks moved by a chemical trick. Question raised by Mufti Abu Laythposition checkedMusa (Moses)Pharaoh (Fir'awn)Quran 20:59 (the meeting at forenoon on the day of the festival)Quran 20:66 (their ropes and sticks seemed to him to move) machine6 min 15 s0:01on YouTube
20 Apr 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did Musa beat Pharaoh's magicians with stronger magic? No: Mufti Abu Layth prefers the reading that Musa's staff exposed the magicians' trickery, since out-doing their magic would only teach that might is right. Lessonposition checkedIbn Arabi (Muhyi al-Din) [?]Musa (Moses)ThrasymachusSocrates machine7 min 16 s6:16on YouTube
15 Apr 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Does the Quran's riba verse prove that Satan can possess people? No: Mufti Abu Layth says the verse is imagery, read by the commentators as describing how riba-takers rise on the Day of Judgement or as a picture of consuming greed, and the Quran uses such images, like the zaqqum tree's heads of devils, because humans have imagination. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:275 (like one whom Shaytan has driven to madness by his touch)Quran 37:65 (its shoots are like the heads of devils)ribaShaytan machine5 min 16 s7:47on YouTube
15 Apr 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Should I believe something just because people say the Quran or hadith say so? No: Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran itself appeals to reason, asking people to look, reflect and ponder, and condemns following forefathers blindly, so claims like possession must be tested against reason through the Quran. Someone reading the Quran without a cultural inheritance would never derive possession from it. Lessonposition checkedaql (reason)a hadith must not contradict reason, the Quran and established Sunnah, or uproot a principle of Islam machine2 min 35 s19:34on YouTube
15 Apr 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions If jinn do not possess people, what is ruqya for? The Quran is a cure for what is in the hearts, meaning disbelief and superstition, not a medical treatment. Ruqya and the du'as taught against omens are a scaffolding that steadies a person's faith until it can stand on its own, because the mind clings to ritual. Lessonposition checkedruqya (reading Quran over the afflicted)shifa (cure)Quran 10:57 (a cure for what is in the hearts) [?]iman machine3 min 55 s44:33on YouTube
15 Apr 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Magic in the Quran: Musa and Pharaoh's magicians, an illusion In the Quran the magic of Pharaoh's magicians was only an illusion; Musa's fear was a natural human reaction, not proof that the magic was real. Lessonposition checkedMusaPharaoh (Fir'awn)Quran 20:66 (their ropes seemed to him to move by their magic; verse not numbered by him)Quran 7:116 (they bewitched the eyes of the people; verse not numbered by him) machine5 min 10 s10:13on YouTube
15 Apr 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Harut and Marut, and how magic 'splits' people Harut and Marut may have been two pious men taken for angels who taught skills that looked like magic; the doll-and-needles idea of magic is not from the Quran or Sunnah. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:102 (Harut and Marut in Babylon; verse not numbered by him)Ibn Abbas [?]Arthur C. Clarke machine3 min 14 s40:24on YouTube
9 Apr 2018The Voice of Reason in Islam Was Zakir Naik right to dismiss evolution as 'just a theory'? No: Mufti Abu Layth says Naik's mocking reply to an ex-Muslim did Islam a disservice, and that in science a theory can be an established fact, as with gravity, not merely a hypothesis. LessonZakir Naik machine3 min 52 s41:47on YouTube
9 Apr 2018The Voice of Reason in Islam Does the Quran have to mention something for it to be true? No: the Quran tells people to explore how creation began and never claimed to exhaust knowledge; its statement that everything is created in pairs is a general truth, not a taxonomy that rules out creatures which reproduce without a male. Lessonposition checkedQuran 29:20 (walk the earth and see how He began creation; he names Surah al-Ankabut without the verse number) [?]Quran 51:49 (of everything We created pairs; verse not numbered by him) [?] machine3 min 54 s45:39on YouTube
9 Apr 2018The Voice of Reason in Islam Will using reason make me lose my faith? No, Mufti Abu Layth says: fearing that reason leads out of Islam betrays a lack of belief that Islam is true, and doubt that leads to a more certain understanding is legitimate, as Ibrahim's request to see how Allah revives the dead shows. Lessonposition checkedIbrahim (Abraham)Quran 2:260 (my Lord, show me how You give life to the dead; verse not numbered by him) [?]report: we are more deserving of doubt than ibrahim machine2 min 36 s58:44on YouTube
15 Mar 2018Responding to Refutations Does the verse about Jesus speaking as a kahl prove he will return? No: kahl means mature adulthood from about thirty or forty, and al-Razi says Jesus reached that age on earth. The reading of the verse as the second coming first appeared with a scholar who died in the 280s AH, not among the salaf. Lessonposition checkedIsa (Jesus)kahlQuran 3:46 (he will speak to people in the cradle and as a kahl; the phrase also occurs in 5:110)Fakhr al-Din al-Razi machine2 min 38 s5:13on YouTube
15 Mar 2018Responding to Refutations Does 'before his death' in Quran 4:159 refer to the return of Jesus? No: Mufti Abu Layth says early authorities including Ibn Abbas, Mujahid and al-Dahhak read the pronoun as the Christian who realises the truth at death, and Ubayy ibn Ka'b's recitation has 'before their death'. Referring it to Jesus's return would exclude every Christian who died over two thousand years. Lessonposition checkedIsa (Jesus)Quran 4:159 (none of the People of the Book but will believe in him before his death)Ibn AbbasIbn Kathir [?] machine2 min 35 s7:51on YouTube
13 Mar 2018Islamic Eschatology Verse 3:46 and the meaning of kahl: al-Razi and the origin of the second-coming reading Kahl in 3:46 means mature manhood, which al-Razi says Jesus reached on earth; the reading of the verse as a second coming began only in the late third century with al-Bajali. Lessonposition checkedQuran 3:46Fakhr al-Din al-Razial-Husayn ibn al-Fadl al-Bajali al-Naysaburi [?]kahl machine2 min 36 s2:08:49on YouTube
13 Mar 2018Islamic Eschatology Verses 4:159 and 43:61: 'before his death' and 'knowledge of the hour' Neither 4:159 nor 43:61 establishes a return: the early exegetes read 4:159 of each Christian at death, Ubayy's reading is plural, and 43:61 says knowledge, not sign. Lessonposition checkedQuran 4:159Quran 43:61Ibn AbbasMujahid ibn Jabr machine3 min 56 s2:11:25on YouTube
13 Feb 2018Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Did someone really do magic on the Prophet? No: he calls the report of magic on the Prophet falsely attributed and an affront to his honour, and says the Quls were revealed years earlier in Makkah. Lessonposition checkedQuran 112 (Surat al-Ikhlas)Quran 113:1-5 (Surat al-Falaq)Quran 114 (Surat al-Nas)Quran 113:4 (from the evil of those who blow on knots) machine3 min 44 s6:50on YouTube

2017 · 4

19 Oct 2017video Does the Quran forbid every kind of excess when it forbids riba? The definite article in 'Allah forbade riba' points to a specific known kind of riba, not every excess, since most excesses are not haram. Umar wished the Prophet had explained riba, and Ibn Abbas held there was no riba except in delay. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:275 (Allah has permitted sale and forbidden riba)ribaal-'ahd al-dhihni (definite article referring to a known thing)khars (estimating dates on the tree) [?] machine2 min 56 s14:16on YouTube
19 Oct 2017video Why did the Quran declare war on riba? The Quran declared war on riba because of the tyranny of a loan-shark culture in a world of finite money, which modern banking does not resemble. The only similarity is that more is repaid than taken, which banks explain by inflation and motivation. Lessonposition checkedribaQuran 2:279 (be informed of a war from Allah)Adam Smith machine4 min 22 s49:44on YouTube
20 Sep 2017Debunking Myths On: Jinns, Magic, the Evil Eye, and Superstitions Does the Quran's verse about the touch of Shaytan prove that jinn possess people? No: the riba verse describes how usurers will rise on the Day of Judgement or pictures their greed, and the image of Shaytan's touch is drawn from human imagination, like the tree of Jahannam whose fruit is 'like the heads of devils'. It is a misused verse, not a proof. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:275 (like one whom Shaytan has driven to madness by his touch)Quran 37:65 (the tree of Jahannam, its fruit like the heads of devils)Ibn Atiyya [?]riba machine3 min 56 s58:35on YouTube
14 Sep 2017From the Mind of a Mufti Can Islamic punishments like stoning and cutting off hands change with time? Yes, in his understanding: the Sharia itself asks for punishments fitting the age, so today they would be replaced by penalties such as prison, following Maliki and other precedents. Question source not recordedposition checkedhudud (prescribed punishments)the hudud change with the agetrajectory hermeneuticsmaqasid al-shari'ah [?] machine5 min 03 s0:00on YouTube

2016 · 4

21 Dec 2016video How can young Muslims be made interested in their faith? Learn some Arabic and get to know the scholars as the fascinating, humorous people they were, presenting the deen as appealingly as it truly is. Lessonposition checkedImam al-BukhariSufyan al-Thawri machine5 min 09 s40:05on YouTube
15 Mar 2016video The verse on men having a degree over women, read in its passage The verse about a degree over women is read by one speaker as concerning women in their waiting period, not a general ranking of men above women. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechNouman Ali KhanQuran 2:228 (men have a degree over them) [?] machine1 min 22 s5:25on YouTube
15 Mar 2016video Ritualisation of the deen and the angels' question about Adam: can believers ask? The deen has been ritualised so that scholarly conclusions cannot be questioned, while the angels' question to Allah about creating Adam is read as a model that believers may ask questions. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechNouman Ali KhanQuran 2:30 (the angels ask about the khalifah) [?]Quran 2:260 (show me how You give life to the dead) [?]khalifah [?] machine5 min 12 s23:55on YouTube
15 Mar 2016video Creation before Adam: Neanderthals, bashar and insan, and the formation of man Creation before Adam is discussed through a distinction between bashar and insan and two ways of reading the fossil record. The speaker raising it says he has no verdict either way. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechNouman Ali KhanbasharinsanQuran 7:11 (We created you, then gave you form) [?] machine3 min 49 s29:07on YouTube

2014 · 4

2 Jul 2014video What is Mufti Abu Layth's favourite Islamic science? Fiqh, because he loves debate and argument between the schools, though he also has a strong interest in hadith and Arabic grammar. Question source not recorded machine2 min 33 s10:20on YouTube
18 Jan 2014video How do I start memorising the Quran? Memorising the Quran is among the greatest things a Muslim can do, and knowing Arabic helps immensely. What matters most is routine, and the lesson will cover tips, a dua and how to apply it. Lessonposition checkedAli ibn Abi Talib machine2 min 35 s1:21on YouTube
18 Jan 2014video What is the dua for memorising the Quran and how do I perform it? On Thursday night, in the last part of the night, pray four units with al-Fatiha and a set surah in each, then say the dua the Prophet taught Ali asking that the Quran stick to the heart, for three, five or seven Fridays. The Quran may be held and read from during the prayer according to the majority. Lessonposition checkedAli ibn Abi Talibreport: ali said he found it difficult to retain the quran and the prophet taught him to pray four rakahs on the night of friday and a dua so it would stickduasalah machine5 min 21 s2:39on YouTube
18 Jan 2014video What practical techniques help me memorise the Quran? Understand the words and translation first, keep a fixed place and a time that suits you, familiarise yourself with each verse before a break, then memorise the verses cumulatively, practise them in salah and recall them at night before reading to your teacher. In the hadith, Ali went from struggling with four verses to recalling forty. Lessonposition checkedAli ibn Abi TalibIbn Abbasreport: ali said he found it difficult to retain the quran and the prophet taught him to pray four rakahs on the night of friday and a dua so it would sticksalah machine5 min 38 s8:00on YouTube