Recordings › Prof. Dr Khalil Andani | The Oral Text & the Ontology of The Quran | Mindtrap with Mufti #28 · 3 Jul 2020 › Segment 11 of 23
Is Arabic an eternal, divine language?
hadith hadeeth ahaadeeth hadis hadees ahaadith muftis sunna sunnat sunan prophetic practice ilm al-kalam kalaam theology ashaira asha'irah ashariyyah ash'arite maturidi maturidiyyah maturidite koran quraan al-quran wahi waheeIs Arabic eternal? Grammarians, Gabriel and the language of revelation
Play from 50:31
The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.
Watch this part
Open on YouTube at 50:31The player starts at 50:31, the beginning of this part.
This segment50:31 to 52:33 · 2 min 02 sGeneral teaching
What this part covers
machinesummary, machine-writtenMufti Abu Layth rejects grammarians' claim that Arabic is eternal; both describe the Ash'ari view that revelation takes the language of its audience.
In more detail
Mufti Abu Layth says some grammarians, naming one he is unsure of [?] and Abu Ali al-Farisi, went so far as to say that because the Quran is divine Arabic must be eternal and the language God always spoke with the angels, whereas Arabic developed only a few centuries before the Prophet. The guest adds a report attributed to Ibn Abbas, which he doubts goes back to him, that Gabriel received every prophet's message in Arabic and translated it, found in al-Suyuti's Itqan and also in al-Zarkashi. Mufti says al-Baqillani and others held that revelation is a meaning that became Hebrew when given to Moses and Arabic when given to the Prophet, and the guest agrees that for Ash'aris and Maturidis it takes the form of a language depending on where Gabriel takes it.
- Guest speech overlaps this segment
- Some terms in this segment are uncertain
- May contain a view quoted in order to be discussed; no position is attributed until reviewed
Position stated
Not yet double-checkedA summary of the view expressed is published here only after a second, independent review has found the sentence in the transcript where he says it. Until then, the transcript and the recording speak for themselves.
Kind: general teaching Speakers: host and guest; guest speech is labelled and excluded from positionsTranscript
machine50:31 to 52:33 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
A guest speaks in this segment. Guest speech is labelled and is excluded from the positions layer.
This segment may contain a view quoted in order to be discussed. Until reviewed, nothing in it is recorded as a position held.
Yeah. Now, that is an important integral difference there. It is cuz that sort of change that set that frames the whole debate. Uh it's not that Mu'tazilites say the Kalam Allah is created and the Ash'aris say it's uncreated. That's That's the secondary debate. The primary debate is what's the nature of Kalam? What's the nature of speech? And on this, even grammarians would have a different answer. Because what's funny is you get some grammarians.
I I think Ibn al-Qinnish from amongst them or Abu Ali al-Farsi. And they've gone to the extent say, "Well, because the Quran is divine, therefore Arabic is eternal and has always been a divine and it was the language which God always spoke with the angels." Because they've they've kind of worked backwards in because they've began with a concept of saying, "Well, the Quran is divine. The Quran's always being, you know, the you know, the speech of God." So, therefore, uh it's in Arabic.
So, Arabic must have equally existed. So, yeah. I mean, they've gone to that extreme even though we know, well, Arabic what probably at most two, you know, even if you stretch it three, but two and a half centuries before the prophet it really develops the Arabic language. Mhm. There's even uh reports for I mean, I don't think they go back to Ibn Abbas, but Ibn Abbas allegedly said that every that Angel Gabriel uh uh was given the message of every prophet in Arabic and then Gabriel translated it to the local language.
I mean, there's even reports like that. This is of course in in Suyuti's uh Itqan book and it's repeated. I think Zarkashi has it, too. So, there is this sort of And the interesting thing on that is Baqillani and the others, they say as that the revelation wahy is like a meaning I'm using the word frequency, but it's like a meaning if it was given to Musa, it ended up becoming Hebrew in the Quran.
If it was given to the prophet, it ended up becoming Arabic in the Quran. If it So, it's like the output source kind of determines the language. Yeah. Yes. The audience. Yeah, so So, the the Ash'ari position and the Maturidis agree is that before or as it reaches Gabriel, it becomes it takes the form of a language depending on where Gabriel's going with it.
But, keeping in mind certain ahadith and Sunnah that the prophet is saying revelation comes to me like a ringing sound. And there is no mention of Jibril, you know, it's just direct like it comes to me and then I express it. I mean, I find myself in line with those people who who say that it is expressed to the prophet like he kind of sees it and expresses it. It's within him that it kind of as opposed to it's in the mind of Gabriel who Although they're all kind of views like the Right.
Paragraphs overlapping 50:31 to 52:33. Full text on the recording page.
Cite this segment
Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2020-07-03-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/xznxiyp0b5s/s/11/ (accessed 1 November 2026)
- APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2020, July 3). Is Arabic an eternal, divine language? [Video, segment 2020-07-03-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/xznxiyp0b5s/s/11/
- Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2020. "Is Arabic an eternal, divine language?" Video, segment 2020-07-03-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded July 3, 2020. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/xznxiyp0b5s/s/11/
- BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2020-07-03-S11, author = {Mufti Abu Layth}, title = {{Is Arabic an eternal, divine language?}}, year = {2020}, month = {7}, date = {2020-07-03}, howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/xznxiyp0b5s/s/11/}}, url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/xznxiyp0b5s/s/11/}, organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive}, urldate = {2026-11-01}, note = {Segment 2020-07-03-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors} }
Something wrong here?
Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.
Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.
No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.