Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Recordings › A Response to Yasir Qadhi on Miracles | Mufti Abu Layth · 3 Nov 2019 › Segment 11 of 11

machine

Can old interpretations of the Quran be revisited, and what role does reason play?

muftis koran quraan al-quran ulama ulema ulamaa as-salamu alaykum assalamualaikum salaam salaams salam alaykum wa alaykum as-salam peace greeting al-din ad-deen ad-din

Closing: reason has primacy, and interpretations may be revisited

LessonRecorded 3 Nov 2019Responding to RefutationsSegment 11 of 11 in the recording2019-11-03b-S11

Play from 46:59 The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.

Watch this part

Open on YouTube at 46:59

The player starts at 46:59, the beginning of this part.

This segment46:59 to 48:46 · 1 min 47 sGeneral teaching

What this part covers

machinesummary, machine-written

Mufti Abu Layth says long-standing interpretations that are not the Quran's clear expression may be revisited and that reason has primacy, but one must not condemn others for doing what one does oneself.

In more detail

Wrapping up, Mufti Abu Layth clarifies that he does hold that certain interpretations which have existed for hundreds of years need to be revisited, because they are an interpretation by certain people rather than the clear expression of the Quran, and that several great scholars of recent times have said so. He says the voice of reason is always paramount and that he gives it primacy, because through it one understands that the deen of Islam is valid and holds true. What he will not do, he says, is reinterpret things himself while calling others deviants for doing the same, which he calls a reflection of a fanatic past of excommunicating people, now expelling them from mainstream Islam instead. He then signs off.

Position stated

correctedChecked by two independent reviews, not by the channel

Mufti Abu Layth says the voice of reason is always paramount and that he gives it primacy, because through it one can understand that the deen of Islam holds true.

In his words

“and yes reason the voice of reason is always paramount and I do give primacy to it because through it we can understand that the deen of islam has validity that is to us it holds true”

Category: method

Report an error

Kind: general teaching

Transcript

machine46:59 to 48:46 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
46:20

firm metaphorical spur right you know and how far is the Apple full from the tree so so these things you know it's interesting how these people assume such a lofty position in Islam and the dictate to others and so yeah so I hope so these are some of my thoughts people I know I kind of went on for a while whoa is that the time guys let's wrap this up it's been awesome I hope that some food for thought I want to clarify that look yes I do feel that there are certain interpretations that have

46:58

existed for hundreds of years I'm not the only one several great scholars of our recent times have said they need to be revisited because they're not the clear expression of the Quran they were an interpretation by certain people and yes reason the voice of reason is always paramount and I do give primacy to it because through it we can understand that the deen of islam has validity that is to us it holds true and I'm not the only one that says it does does this but what I won't do is oh I interpret things but when you have one interpretation

47:38

call you a deviant and then but my own I kind of say oh but this is totally fine I'm doing this but you when you interpret you leave the fold of mainstream Islam which is just a reflective of that fanatic past you know that fanatic extremist past of of excommunicating people chucking them out of the religion or but now you're not chucking them out the religion you're just chucking them out of mainstream Islam not that it was your dad's Deen to begin with

48:12

anyway people as always it's been an absolute none I think it's an overall I'm not sure how but it is a rule if you type that in aro you are it should bring it up hopefully on YouTube or Google people let's call it call it a wrap with that take very good care of yourselves remember mean you're kind of us assalamu alaikum warahmatullah to allah oberek are two people over now salam aleikum

Paragraphs overlapping 46:59 to 48:46. Full text on the recording page.

Cite this segment

Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.

Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2019-11-03b-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/smoocevigde/s/11/ (accessed 1 November 2026)

APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2019, November 3). Can old interpretations of the Quran be revisited, and what role does reason play? [Video, segment 2019-11-03b-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/smoocevigde/s/11/
Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2019. "Can old interpretations of the Quran be revisited, and what role does reason play?" Video, segment 2019-11-03b-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded November 3, 2019. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/smoocevigde/s/11/
BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2019-11-03b-S11,
  author = {Mufti Abu Layth},
  title = {{Can old interpretations of the Quran be revisited, and what role does reason play?}},
  year = {2019},
  month = {11},
  date = {2019-11-03},
  howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/smoocevigde/s/11/}},
  url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/smoocevigde/s/11/},
  organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive},
  urldate = {2026-11-01},
  note = {Segment 2019-11-03b-S11, auto-transcribed, may contain errors}
}
Something wrong here?

Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.

Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.

No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.