Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta
Subscribe on YouTube Support on Patreon

Recordings › Prof. Edip Yuksel | Rejecting Hadith, Rashad Khalifa & Realizing '19' | MindTrap with Mufti #27 · 26 Jun 2020 › Segment 26 of 36

machine

Does the number 19 structure work in all the readings of the Quran?

muftis koran quraan al-quran qira'ah qiraa'aat qira'aat ma sha allah masha'allah masha allah mashaa allah

The qira'at: does the 19 structure hold across the Hafs and Warsh readings?

QuestionLive chat · questioner not identifiedAnswered 26 Jun 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu LaythSegment 26 of 36 in the recording2020-06-26-S26

Includes guest speechQuoted view · not his position
Play from 2:21:49 The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.

Watch the answer

Open on YouTube at 2:21:49

The player starts at 2:21:49, where the answer begins.

This segment2:21:49 to 2:24:24 · 2 min 35 sA view quoted in order to be discussed, not a position held

The answer in brief

machinesummary, machine-written

The guest says the 19 structure is found in the Hafs reading, where it revealed two spelling errors and two added verses, and that the Warsh reading differs little; he also expresses regard for Ghulam Ahmad Parwez.

In more detail

Mufti Abu Layth reads a chat question on the different recitations of the Quran, asking whether the guest holds all of them equally valid. The guest says that having found the incredibly precise 19 structure in the Hafs reading, which has an error-correction ability, he found in it a couple of spelling errors and two added verses, and that older manuscripts justified his conclusion in at least two important cases, so he has no doubt about it; the Warsh reading, he says, differs little and the mathematical structure cannot be counterfeited or faked. Mufti says he has heard others say the structure holds in Hafs but that they are unsure about other readings. A further chat question asks about Ghulam Ahmad Parwez of the subcontinent; the guest says he has not read much but likes him and thinks he was very close to the message of the Quran alone.

Question as read aloud · questioner not identified

What are your thoughts on the different recitations of the Quran: do you feel all of them are equally valid?

Position stated

This segment presents a view in order to discuss or respond to it. It is recorded as quoted, never as held, and no position is attributed from it.

Kind: a view quoted in order to be discussed, not a position held Speakers: host and guest; guest speech is labelled and excluded from positions

Transcript

machine2:21:49 to 2:24:24 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary

A guest speaks in this segment. Guest speech is labelled and is excluded from the positions layer.

This segment states a view in order to discuss it. It is recorded as a quoted view, not as a position held.

2:21:46

deviants or misguided at the end of the day it's what makes sense to people and this kind of clerical approach about out casting people I'm personally against that that's not I mean that's just all about powers of position and things like that so just because somebody had asked a deep a question here you know the Quran the different recitations what are your thoughts on that is it only have some awesome this rewire that we have are you feeling that all of them are equally kind of valid or do you not have much thoughts on them well on the street

2:22:25

I saw these awesomes version and it's called the which one is it has a solution are you talking about this house yes yes of watch yeah exactly on the street I saw this a half's version I found out that number 19 is in it an incredible mathematical structure it cannot be contained it's very precise and it has some error correction ability when I do check I found out in this version there are some errors spelling

2:23:01

errors a couple of them and also two verses edit and when I check with the older many schools I found out it is justified at least in two very important cases and therefore I I don't have any doubt about that and the worst version is not much different there are few differences but I see that this is exactly mathematical structure Quran is in it it cannot be constants it cannot be faked sure I mean that's I've heard some other people say that as well that they've said that they feel the

2:23:39

mathematical structures stand regarding this but they're not sure about the other readings somebody's asked a question here what are you do you have any thoughts on column ahmed perez who was from the indian subcontinent and from pakistan specifically and he was also rejected he's also part of the karani Brownian movement I haven't read much but as far as I know I like the person of course I may disagree with some of his position but I think that he was very close to the message of common alone mashallah that

2:24:18

is commendable yeah alright somebody is asking a question but I can't seem to see the Arabic very clearly says what ilkka now Martin can't see the rest of it it seems to shouldn't this be this categorically imply that slavery should not be carried out right okay I'm not sure I can't unfortunately we see the roll down but really see I love in Bernice right Eli can see the pop up when he is right and I bet to be nice Ryu

Paragraphs overlapping 2:21:49 to 2:24:24. Full text on the recording page.

Cite this segment

Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.

Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2020-06-26-S26, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zmirskjob4o/s/26/ (accessed 1 November 2026)

APA 7 
Mufti Abu Layth. (2020, June 26). Does the number 19 structure work in all the readings of the Quran? [Video, segment 2020-06-26-S26, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zmirskjob4o/s/26/
Chicago author-date 
Mufti Abu Layth. 2020. "Does the number 19 structure work in all the readings of the Quran?" Video, segment 2020-06-26-S26, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded June 26, 2020. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zmirskjob4o/s/26/
BibTeX 
@misc{abulayth-2020-06-26-S26,
  author = {Mufti Abu Layth},
  title = {{Does the number 19 structure work in all the readings of the Quran?}},
  year = {2020},
  month = {6},
  date = {2020-06-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zmirskjob4o/s/26/}},
  url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zmirskjob4o/s/26/},
  organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive},
  urldate = {2026-11-01},
  note = {Segment 2020-06-26-S26, auto-transcribed, may contain errors}
}
Something wrong here?

Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.

Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.

No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.