Is Yasir Qadhi's case for reading the Quran literally consistent?

yourself I love called the has stated now there are countless contradictions in what he said as well and I'll go through some of these by the way those of you just tuning in I can see a few people are tuning in if you if you do like and share this so we can get I'd like as many people as possible this message to reach them about this video of Chef Yasir Qadhi and the response and the response to his objections and criticisms so chef yes sir does go on to say in in the same

talk that by the way I do accept the Quran will always continue to unlock and unravel new meanings for people throughout time which I didn't get by the way because that kind of contradicted his first point because if the Quran unravels a new meaning for you then surely it's not going to come up with a new word or something because enough you know the Quran is words already expressed so that means it's gonna be if anything in interpretation so if your interpretation is is new and

unprecedented as he says that it will continue to unravel and unlock new meanings for people throughout time then that means you've come up with something radically different which means you are a new prophet according to Sharia socata himself in the same video so I don't know how he reconciled those two points together right so I'm I'm thinking so these are some some issues right now also one could sum up before getting and

this is the kind of intro to his before getting into his actual points you can sum up what right throughout his 30-minute hotma he is arguing very much for the the literal reading of the Quran and arguing against a non literal reading of the Quran so he highlights time and time again that anybody who says that the metaphor in the Quran that the symbolism in the Quran the stories can represent metaphors or symbols is is a deviant is a heretic these are radical

new interpretations if Allah wanted to mention a story could mention a story he goes on to say that Quran Islam is not about stories he repeats that message on a few occasion and he condemns this thing of metaphor I mean the whole hook bar is pretty much sums up the fact that is very strongly arguing for a literal reading of the Quran and arguing against in fact condemning a non literal reading of the Quran right ironically by the way

he himself at one point when he's arguing his third point about why you need to stick with what is the orthodoxy he goes on to say that yet allahi wa l-jamaa add that the hand of God is with and he translates this as by the way this means the mercy of God which is a non literal reading which kind of contradicts his earlier point about you can't have non-literal readings of the Quranic must be literal readings and then especially he stresses the point about beliefs he says that regarding

beliefs we must be very literal and we can't have new radical new interpretations they must be the old interpretations of the people before ok so right so this is important so that's what I would like to take a look at in order to take a look at that I want to say a few words in a few minutes about share yourself Adi now I think it's important to highlight these now share here sort of Adi we've got to understand these arguments are stemming from some way ok now in order to understand the argument you have to