Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Topics › Fiqh and daily practice › Public law and governance › Apostasy and blasphemy

Apostasy and blasphemy

28 segments in 14 recordings · 2018 to 2024 · 0 verified · 21 checked positions · fiqh/public-law-and-governance/apostasy-and-blasphemy · Feed

Most recent statement · 29 Sep 2024Is someone who says something wrong about the Prophet guilty of blasphemy?Older segments link here so no earlier explanation is read as the last word.

Segments on this topic per year

Click a year to jump to it

Latest answer · 29 Sep 2024

29 Sep 2024On Current Events LatestIs someone who says something wrong about the Prophet guilty of blasphemy? Not when there was no such intention: Mufti Abu Layth says Mufti Tariq Masood was clearly wrong, but he meant to praise the Prophet, so calling him a blasphemer is unacceptable. Discussionposition checkedMufti Tariq MasoodAbu al-Walid al-Baji [?]al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi [?]report: the man who lost his camel in the desert said o allah you are my servant and i am your lord machine4 min 34 s5:12on YouTube

Earlier answers · 27 · newest first

2021 · 5

2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Why did Abdullah ibn Abi Sarh leave Islam for a time? Not doubt about the Quran: he feels the man was incentivised by the Makkans and rewarded for intelligence about Madinah, and he later returned to Islam and governed in Egypt. Question from live chatposition checkedAbdullah ibn Abi Sarh [?]al-A'sha [?] (the poet)Quraysh machine3 min 53 s1:00:37on YouTube
16 Feb 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Did the Prophet order a scribe killed for leaving Islam? Not for apostasy, he says: the scribe was not executed, and the issue was treason, since he exposed Madinah's weak points to its enemies; apostasy laws were treason laws. Question from live chatposition checkedAbdullah ibn Sa'd ibn Abi Sarh [?]the Battle of the Trench (al-Ahzab)riddah (apostasy) machine2 min 33 s1:11:59on YouTube
29 Jan 2021MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth What is wijada, and why does it matter for the hadith on killing apostates? The guest says the apostasy hadith cannot justify killing, since its own wording is not followed and it reaches us only by wijada; Mufti Abu Layth blames the Salafi call for putting raw hadith in place of the madhhabs. Discussionguest speechShaykh Atabek Shukurov (guest)wijada (a found manuscript)report: whoever changes his religion kill himSahih al-Bukhari machine4 min 38 s1:06:26on YouTube
29 Jan 2021MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Did the early Hanafis hold that apostates should be killed? The guest says the early Hanafi view, from Abu Hanifa and Zufar, is that apostasy itself carries no punishment and only an actual threat is punished; Mufti Abu Layth calls today's Hanafi blasphemy laws upside down. Discussionguest speechShaykh Atabek Shukurov (guest)Abu HanifaImam Muhammad (al-Shaybani)Zufar machine1 min 55 s1:11:43on YouTube
12 Jan 2021video Why was Ibn Taymiyya put in prison? Ibn Taymiyya made powerful enemies by declaring Muslims kafir, and Maliki judges finally jailed him over his fatwa, voiced by his student in Jerusalem, that one may not travel to visit the Prophet's grave. Mufti Abu Layth calls the view foolish but says no one should be punished for an opinion. Question from live chatposition checkedIbn TaymiyyaIbn Qayyim al-Jawziyya [?]Imam Ahmad ibn HanbalKhadim Hussain Rizvi [?] machine8 min 17 s0:00on YouTube

2020 · 5

4 Aug 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth The Peshawar courtroom killing of an Ahmadi accused of blasphemy Mufti Abu Layth condemns the Peshawar courtroom killing, says a claim to prophethood is not an insult to the Prophet, and blames the authorities for failing to prevent it. Lessonposition checkedPeshawar courtroom killing (2020)Ahmadiyya machine11 min 26 s1:36:23on YouTube
4 Aug 2020Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Does Abu Bakr's war on Musaylima justify killing someone who claims prophethood? Mufti Abu Layth says Abu Bakr's wars were political and the Prophet never ordered Musaylima killed, so they cannot justify killing a claimant. Lessonposition checkedAbu BakrUmar ibn al-KhattabAhmad ibn Hanbalthe Ridda wars machine7 min 16 s1:47:49on YouTube
14 Jul 2020live stream Was Sudan right to drop its alcohol and apostasy laws and end flogging? Mufti Abu Layth welcomes Sudan's reforms: flogging today only damages Islam's message, FGM should be outlawed, and alcohol was never prohibited for non-Muslims. Lessonposition checkedSudan's legal reforms (2020)female genital mutilationalcohol (khamr)Ibn Ashur machine2 min 28 s2:08:00on YouTube
22 Apr 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Does the Quran prescribe a punishment for apostasy? The Quran prescribes no worldly penalty for apostasy, only punishment in the hereafter, and 'there is no compulsion in religion' is stated as emphatically as the testimony of faith. Rightly representing the Quran is about pleasing Allah, not the kuffar. Discussionquoted view, not his positionguest speechDr Shabir Ally (guest)Quran 2:256 (there is no compulsion in religion)Quran 88:22 (you are not a supervisor over them) machine2 min 37 s11:34on YouTube
19 Apr 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Were the people who refused zakah after the Prophet's death apostates? The guest says taxes that fund welfare can count as zakah, and that the refusers fought by Abu Bakr were rebels against the state rather than apostates; Mufti Abu Layth says he is inclined to that view. Discussionguest speechShaykh Kashif Khan (guest)Abu BakrUmar ibn al-KhattabMusaylima machine7 min 47 s47:29on YouTube

2019 · 3

21 Aug 2019From the Mind of a Mufti Closing: build bridges, talk to everyone, and an invitation to Daniel Haqiqatjou Talk to everyone, including ex-Muslims, and hold dialogue where ideas differ. Mufti Abu Layth has invited Daniel Haqiqatjou to a dialogue on apostasy. OtherDaniel Haqiqatjou machine1 min18:17on YouTube
4 Aug 2019From the Mind of a Mufti Is capital punishment, including for apostasy, justified? Mufti Abu Layth opposes capital punishment as absurd, killing to stop killing, and calls justifying death for apostasy as treason a stupid argument. He welcomes Mohammed Hijab's apparent move away from the classical ruling to kill apostates. Discussionposition checkedMohammed Hijabriddah (apostasy)SalafiWahhabi machine7 min 25 s29:52on YouTube
25 Jul 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Who transmitted the hadith 'whoever changes his religion, kill him', and does the Quran punish apostasy? Mufti Abu Layth says the Quran is ambivalent about those who leave Islam and that the call to kill apostates is nonsense; the report 'whoever changes his religion, kill him' in Bukhari rests solely on Ikrima, a Khariji whom Imam Malik and Ibn Umar distrusted. He introduces Abdullah Sameer's post as the subject he will answer. Lessonposition checkedAbdullah SameerKhawarijISISIkrima machine5 min 07 s1:18on YouTube

2018 · 14

30 Aug 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari The first problem: Bukhari's semi-divine status above the Quran in practice Sahih al-Bukhari has been given a semi-divine status that in practice places it on par with or above the Quran, which he rejects outright. The Quran always takes precedence, and Bukhari is a book like the other hadith collections. Lessonposition checkedSahih al-BukhariSunan Ibn MajahSunan Said ibn MansurQuran 2:256 machine5 min 17 s6:33on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does Islam punish someone for leaving the faith? Islam gives freedom of belief: the Quran says there is no compulsion in religion and leaves belief to choice, and neither the Quran nor the established Sunnah says an apostate must be killed. Lessonposition checkedQuran 2:256 (there is no compulsion in religion)Quran 18:29 (whoever wishes, let him believe, and whoever wishes, let him disbelieve)Quran 10:99 (would you compel people to become believers?)Quran 109:1-6 (Surah al-Kafirun: to you your religion and to me mine) machine5 min 16 s0:00on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the sanctity of life in Islam rule out killing apostates? Life has conclusive sanctity in Islam, and preserving life and freedom of religion for everyone are among the aims of the shari'ah. Lessonposition checkedQuran 5:32 (whoever kills a soul, it is as if he has killed all mankind)al-Shatibial-Muwafaqat (al-Shatibi)maqasid al-shari'a machine2 min 36 s5:16on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why did some classical scholars rule that apostates be executed? Where classical scholars ruled that apostates be executed, they were dealing with what would now be treason or armed rebellion in a very different world; those rulings do not apply today, and their prevalence then did not make them right. Lessonposition checkedShaykh Abdullah bin BayyahHamza YusufSina'at al-Fatwa [?] (Abdullah bin Bayyah)Mahmud Shaltut machine3 min 57 s7:52on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Did the Prophet ever execute anyone for leaving Islam? The Prophet never executed anyone for disbelief or apostasy: he spared the hypocrite Abdullah ibn Ubayy, traded with Jews until his death, did not act against Ibn Sayyad and pardoned Abdullah ibn Abi Sarh. Lessonposition checked'illah (the operative cause of a ruling)Abdullah ibn Ubayyjanazah (funeral prayer)report: the prophet died with his shield pledged to a jewish man for bags of wheat (unresolved; cited as in Sahih Muslim, number not stated) machine3 min 53 s11:49on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Were apostates punished for disbelief or for fighting against Muslims? The classical punishment targeted apostates who took up arms against the community, not disbelief itself: Umar preferred to restrain and persuade, al-Tahawi tied it to waging war, and the Hanafis exempted women because they were not combatants. Lessonposition checkedUmar ibn al-Khattabreport: umar said i would have restrained him and tried to bring him back (unresolved)al-ShawkaniNayl al-Awtar machine7 min 46 s15:42on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Which hadith are used to justify killing apostates, and were the scholars who used them right? Some scholars did rule that apostates be killed, and he says they were clearly wrong, products of a ruthless age; the time given to apostates in the reports makes sense only as time to withdraw from rebellion. Lessonposition checkedIbn AbbasAbu HurayraAnas ibn MalikHamza al-Aslami [?] machine2 min 38 s23:28on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran What is the context of the hadith 'whoever changes his religion, kill him'? The report 'whoever changes his religion, kill him' clashes with the Quran, and in full it is Ikrima's account of Ali burning people alive and Ibn Abbas objecting that he should have executed them instead. Lessonposition checkedreport: whoever changes his religion kill him (man baddala dinahu faqtuluhu; unresolved, Sahih al-Bukhari and others, number not stated)Sahih al-BukhariSunan al-Nasa'iSunan Ibn Majah machine2 min 36 s26:06on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is Ikrima, the narrator of the apostasy hadith, reliable? The main chains of 'whoever changes his religion, kill him' run through Ikrima, whom he describes as a Khariji, and whom Imam Malik and many early authorities rejected or called a liar. LessonIkrimareport: whoever changes his religion kill him (man baddala dinahu faqtuluhu; unresolved, Sahih al-Bukhari and others, number not stated)KhawarijISIS machine6 min 34 s28:42on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Is the chain of the apostasy hadith through Anas reliable? The alternative chain of the apostasy hadith through Anas is also weak: it includes a narrator with Mu'tazili tendencies and Qatada, who is known for tadlis, and the report clashes with reason, the Quran and the Prophet's life. Lessonposition checkedreport: whoever changes his religion kill him (man baddala dinahu faqtuluhu; unresolved, Sahih al-Bukhari and others, number not stated)Anas ibn MalikQatadaAbd al-Samad [?] machine3 min 58 s35:16on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Are the Abu Hurayra and Hamza al-Aslami narrations on apostasy authentic? The other narrations used for killing apostates, from Abu Hurayra and Hamza al-Aslami, also have problems in their chains: rejected or unknown narrators and a known mudallis. LessonAbu Hurayrareport: abu hurayra narration on killing the apostate (unresolved; content not quoted)Hamza al-Aslami [?]report: hamza al-aslami narration on killing the apostate (unresolved; content not quoted) machine3 min 57 s39:14on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Why would an apostate deserve death, and what about the three days to repent? An apostate cannot be killed for disbelief, since that would condemn every disbeliever, and the 'three days to return to Islam' is absurd: it coerces people into hypocrisy and belittles the Prophet's thirteen years of preaching. Lessonposition checkedal-Tahawi [?]Umar ibn Abd al-Azizjizyaistitabah (asking the apostate to repent) machine5 min 14 s43:11on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran Can a life be taken on the basis of a doubtful hadith? There is no verse and no conclusively established hadith for killing apostates, and a life, whose sanctity is conclusive, cannot be taken on isolated reports that carry doubt; defending it while demanding religious freedom in the West is a double standard. Lessonposition checkednazar (reasoned contemplation, in theology)BJPkhabar al-ahadqat'i (conclusive) machine5 min 17 s48:25on YouTube
10 May 2018Ponderings on the Holy Quran How should Muslims treat people who leave Islam? People who leave Islam should be left alone, since that is between them and God; those who misrepresent the Prophet bear blame for people's hatred, and the Prophet's way was gentleness, not coercion or a state. Lessonposition checkedreport: did you split open his heart (unresolved)report: leave him alone the bedouin who urinated in the mosque (unresolved)report: my example and yours with this man is like a man whose horse ran away (unresolved)Shaykh Akram Nadwi machine6 min 35 s53:42on YouTube