Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Recordings › Ustadh Nouman Ali Khan & Mufti Abu Layth - A Discussion on Contemporary Issues · 15 Mar 2016 › Segment 1 of 7

machine

Apostasy: execution as divine policy, tribal loyalty and treason in wartime

sunna sunnat sunan prophetic practice koran quraan al-quran ayah aya ayat ayaat aayah aayat 'alim aalim ummah umma ummat

DiscussionRecorded 15 Mar 2016Segment 1 of 7 in the recording2016-03-15-S01

Includes guest speechQuoted view · not his position
Play from 0:06 The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.

Watch this part

Open on YouTube at 0:06

The player starts at 0:06, the beginning of this part.

This segment0:06 to 5:25 · 5 min 19 sA view quoted in order to be discussed, not a position held

What this part covers

machinesummary, machine-written

The speakers present the execution of apostates as tied to wartime treason and tribal loyalty in early Arab society rather than to belief alone, and say the Quran should be the primary reference in the discussion.

In more detail

The recording opens mid-conversation with one speaker reporting a view, attributed to others, that apostates should be executed wherever found as the fulfilment of a divine sunnah, so that it is the policy of Allah towards the rebellious rather than a foreign policy of Islam; he adds that some contemporary speakers say the punishment applied only to that time. He summarises an author in America [?] who argues from the Quran that apostasy began as a strategy to create doubt, citing the verse in which the Jews propose to believe and then leave in order to unsettle the Muslims [?], so that threats were made to counter it. The other speaker, apparently the guest [?], adds that tribal identity was supreme in Arab society, that the Muslims had replaced it with a new loyalty, and that in the middle of an ongoing war leaving the community was a declaration of joining the other side, an act of treason, comparing it to renouncing citizenship in peacetime versus wartime in international law. The speakers say that those who leave are nonetheless answerable to Allah, criticise Islamic studies discourse for making the Quran a tertiary reference, and one calls illogical the reading that there is no compulsion only until one enters Islam [?]. The segment ends as one speaker begins to describe an argument he had with a scholar.

  • Guest speech overlaps this segment
  • Low audio confidence in the transcript
  • Some terms in this segment are uncertain

Position stated

This segment presents a view in order to discuss or respond to it. It is recorded as quoted, never as held, and no position is attributed from it.

Kind: a view quoted in order to be discussed, not a position held Speakers: host and guest; guest speech is labelled and excluded from positions

Transcript

machine0:06 to 5:25 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary

A guest speaks in this segment. Guest speech is labelled and is excluded from the positions layer.

This segment states a view in order to discuss it. It is recorded as a quoted view, not as a position held.

0:06

[Music] and so they should be executed wherever they they're found as part of the Fulfillment of divine sunah which means that is not the foreign policy of Islam towards mik it's actually the policy of Allah towards the rebellious in line with the sun of all the other prophets something similar to that is said by I think also people like T Swan and a few people who say the RDA they've said the RDA punishment was there but in that time only uh a few other contemporary but what is interesting is there's a I think is he

0:44

lives in America that uh he's written a book on he has a very and he's got some YouTube videos on it as well very interesting actually he speaks about you see when R first begins how R was a strategy if you look at the Quran Allah is explaining that CU When a person abandon something it creates doubt like obviously like let's say you Embrace an ideology now and you're seen as an intelligent person a week later you leave it people think oh there must have been something wrong with that because you know this guy is intelligent like why would you leave it so making

1:23

reference to the verse in the Quran when like the Y said where they say that let's [Music] that you see we will do this as an attempt to create that that's right so people will think that oh man these guys intelligent people there must be something wrong with this message and and some people have have seen that to counter that strategy there were threats made so that's one interpretation another I mean to add to that I think so tribal identity was Supreme in Arab

1:59

Society yeah and uh well actually Kia is a pretty good indication that Muslim identity considered the Muslims who were sitting there from different tribes riff like once the fighting begins they're not going to be Val you because they have no tribal affination and then they come back testifying that so much as you know so much as he spits and they fight to cash the spit on the ground right so they they understood that loyalty has now changed now the thing is when you forgo your tribal identity in that Society you decare war against that tribe right and if youir G you're fair

2:37

game now the Muslims are in that the um is the early um is in that ecosystem where your identity is with the people you're affiliated with and they've got a new it's not tribal now it's the it's the Shah walking out of that is actually especially in the middle of what is an ongoing war is actually a declaration it is an act of treat it is I have I'm joining the other side you know so like which is very similar to um you know under under peaceful circumstances in international law under peaceful circumstances a Canadian can say I forgo my Canadian citizenship I

3:16

want to become an American oh whatever true but under war in times of War forgoing One citizenship is actually considered you know and you can like even military personel milary can forgo their citizenship under normal circumstances but in during times of War that's actually this is not something limited to like Islamic disc I mean it's like how the world Works what's still crazy as you say still against the

3:58

of whole thing of Allah has mentioned those people who do this they they responsible they answerable to Allah Quran yeah you're talking about the real deal Quran was just talking about to what really IR me in sometimes in Islamic Studies uh discourse is how Quran is made this tertiary reference that that's not the real conversation the real conversation

4:36

is what XY and Z the like glossy no it is so like this verse like a clear verse now think about this is this is the first must of that's the favorite thing to to by the way anybody has like a allergy the first thing they go after but and even to say okay there's no until you enter it that's still it's it's illogical is like to say that okay look I tell you what don't worry about you can Embrace if you want Oh but once you embrace

5:15

it and so so this is the I had an interesting argument with a scholar that shall okay an entire discussion about how men have a degree over women actually that doesn't hold the AY begins

Paragraphs overlapping 0:06 to 5:25. Full text on the recording page.

Cite this segment

Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.

Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2016-03-15-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zbya7rqfyru/s/1/ (accessed 1 November 2026)

APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2016, March 15). Apostasy: execution as divine policy, tribal loyalty and treason in wartime [Video, segment 2016-03-15-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zbya7rqfyru/s/1/
Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2016. "Apostasy: execution as divine policy, tribal loyalty and treason in wartime." Video, segment 2016-03-15-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded March 15, 2016. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zbya7rqfyru/s/1/
BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2016-03-15-S01,
  author = {Mufti Abu Layth},
  title = {{Apostasy: execution as divine policy, tribal loyalty and treason in wartime}},
  year = {2016},
  month = {3},
  date = {2016-03-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zbya7rqfyru/s/1/}},
  url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/zbya7rqfyru/s/1/},
  organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive},
  urldate = {2026-11-01},
  note = {Segment 2016-03-15-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors}
}
Something wrong here?

Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.

Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.

No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.