Recordings › Shaykh Dr. Shabir Ally | Juxtaposing the Quran, Jumbling Aisha's age & Jinn Possession | MindTrap#16 · 22 Apr 2020 › Segment 8 of 23
Why do Muslims treat reason as the enemy of tradition?
hadeeth ahadith ahaadeeth hadis ahaadith malik ibn anas malik bin anas imam maalik imam malik ibn anas imaam imams prayer leader qiyas qiyaas muftis sunna sunnat sunan prophetic practice iman imaan eemaan eeman koran quraan al-quran ummah umma ummat deen al-din ad-deen ad-dinHas the intellect been demonised? Ahl al-Hadith against Ahl al-Ra'y, and why the question is wrongly framed
Play from 28:36
The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.
Watch this part
Open on YouTube at 28:36The player starts at 28:36, the beginning of this part.
This segment27:18 to 32:34 · 5 min 16 sGeneral teaching
What this part covers
machinesummary, machine-writtenHistorically the Ahl al-Hadith defeated the Ahl al-Ra'y, which preserved the tradition but left reason demonised; today reason and tradition must work together. Mufti Abu Layth says asking whether one prefers reason to revelation is a false framing, since the real choice is between one understanding of the Quran and another.
In more detail
Mufti Abu Layth asks whether the aql has been demonised over time, since Muslims seem to be among the few communities to use the word pejoratively. The guest returns to the balcony: Islamic history shows a great struggle between those who called themselves Ahl al-Hadith and the people of opinion, Ahl al-Ra'y, who used their aql; the champions of hadith as the antithesis of reason were victorious, and from them the traditional religion was inherited. He says this was in a way a good thing, since everyone's aql differs and Islam might otherwise have splintered into hundreds of strands, so sticking closely to the traditions preserved the tradition for us. But at the present juncture new situations require original thinking, and the aql must be applied, not against the tradition but together with it: the aql interprets the naql and the naql guides the aql, in a symbiotic relationship. Mufti says the question itself is wrongly placed and puts whoever answers it on the back foot. He compares it to asking whether one prefers Imam Malik or Abu Hanifa to the Prophet, when the imam is stating what he understands the Prophet's teaching to be, as is the hadith compiler, so like must be compared with like; likewise 'do you give your aql preference over divine guidance' is a false statement, and the real question is whether one gives one's own understanding of the Quran preference over somebody else's understanding of it.
- Guest speech overlaps this segment
Position stated
Waiting for the speaker checkA guest speaks in this segment and the captions do not say who said what. The view found here is held back until the speaker-separated transcript confirms the words are his, or the channel verifies it. The transcript and recording are published in full.
Kind: general teaching Speakers: host and guest; guest speech is labelled and excluded from positionsTranscript
machine27:18 to 32:34 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
A guest speaks in this segment. Guest speech is labelled and is excluded from the positions layer.
and keeps it from going astray so this term Apple has been applied to the human intellect in the Arabic language as an indication of the ancient thought about this that the the aqil actually keeps the person from going astray and in Iran we do not find this meaning being opposed in fact on the other hand we find that the Quran is praising the Apple and is asking you after that afternoon do you not reflect do you not use your intellect and the the Quran is asking about the people who did not believe in allah subhanho wa taala
awfully Mia Cyril fill our G but a kun Allah whom Columbia afternoon avea have they not gone have they not travelled in the earth so that they would have hearts with which they can they can think they can intellectualize so of course we're not talking about the physical heart because that's not the instrument or or organ of of intellectualization but but the quran is using language through the
journey of the institutionalization of the d but don't you feel the apple has become demonized over time like people muslims i feel are the only I think maybe amongst the only few subset communities ever that use the word upper pejoratively like oh my god you're using your akka so this brings me back to the point I was making about standing on the balcony because from the balcony we can see that over our history there has been a great struggle between people who call themselves a little Hadees and and they
saw themselves as being opposed to Allah and the people of opinion and the people of opinion are basically the people who are using their Apple but they were dubbed like this at love rocky now the the it's it's the people who were so much in favor of hadith but not only in favor of hadith but those who used hadith and championed it as the antithesis to Akal they are the ones who became victorious in our history and it is from them that we have basically inherited the traditional religion so in
a way that's a great thing because we can see the tendency of the human offal to be different from one person to another yours is different from mine and ours are different from the viewers and so on so everybody's got their own opinion on things and if everybody had his own way throughout Islamic history you can even imagine that Islam would have splintered into so many hundreds of different strands that we would be lost between all of them under for a long time in Islamic history Muslims survived very well and the Islamic faith and community survived by by taking that
narrow path in the dichotomy instead of going the way of Akko they saw that they needed to stick very closely to the traditions and so with that they have preserved for us two traditions but now we have come to a new juncture in the road where things are happening like never before we are faced with many new situations that require very new and original thinking and and with that we have to absolutely apply our Apple but right now again we should be clear that it is not apple in Contra distinction to the tradition it is our together
together with the with the tradition that is the knuckle and Apple going together knuckle the base I mean in the street except 3d apple exactly exactly so I the way I would like to put it shake is that the vehicle interprets the knuckle and the knuckle guides the Apple yeah so the to work hand in hand the tradition it guides the intellect and the intellect interprets the tradition and and the to move forward in in a symbiotic relationship that's beautifully said often said to people when they've asked me this question that this question is
in itself placed wrong like it's it's wrongly placed because it puts you no matter how you answer if you're gonna answer it especially in this kind of a way you're already on the backfoot it's like a kind of analogy if you like is to say something when some people have said oh well imam abu hanifa has said this as an example or imam malik I said these oh but the prophet has said this who do you take preference to now that is a you know that is a false statement because
in essence what you ought to be saying is imam malik according to this teaching of the Prophet is saying this and such and such according or Imam hadees which who has documented the teaching of the Prophet says this which Sunnah do you go with like you put like against like to kind of miss out one of those is it's so catastrophic in this particular context now similarly when we say oh do you give our color preference over divine guidance that's wrongly that's a false statement
Paragraphs overlapping 27:18 to 32:34. Full text on the recording page.
Cite this segment
Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2020-04-22-S08, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/ksqksrxndnw/s/8/ (accessed 1 November 2026)
- APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2020, April 22). Why do Muslims treat reason as the enemy of tradition? [Video, segment 2020-04-22-S08, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/ksqksrxndnw/s/8/
- Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2020. "Why do Muslims treat reason as the enemy of tradition?" Video, segment 2020-04-22-S08, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded April 22, 2020. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/ksqksrxndnw/s/8/
- BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2020-04-22-S08, author = {Mufti Abu Layth}, title = {{Why do Muslims treat reason as the enemy of tradition?}}, year = {2020}, month = {4}, date = {2020-04-22}, howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/ksqksrxndnw/s/8/}}, url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/ksqksrxndnw/s/8/}, organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive}, urldate = {2026-11-01}, note = {Segment 2020-04-22-S08, auto-transcribed, may contain errors} }
Something wrong here?
Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.
Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.
No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.