Why don't madrasas teach the Islamic philosophers and the Mu'tazila?

you know you've uh in invested a lot in learning and promoting this. Tell us a bit about a bit about this and your interest in it. Uh do yeah so I haven't really put anything out publicly much yet other than I did teach a series on Islamic intellectual history which maybe some people would uh uh know of me from that. Um, but that is one of my interests is Islamic intellectual history. And it's precisely because, and this is a problem with the Madrasa traditional Islamic learning system, is that I think they're gaslighting us.

Um, they are they call themselves traditionalists, but in reality, they only value a small part of the tradition, a very narrow understanding of what tradition is. So what I tried to do in the course that I taught is to expand our minds to see the great diversity of the true Islamic tradition so that we can value it and know what we have back in it. Um so for example they don't teach anything about the great Islamic philosophers.

We're talking about Iben Rush Iban Cena Aarois Avisa um Ibn Tufel. They don't teach us about you know they don't tell us about these people at all. uh we don't know anything other than very negative stereotypical things about the we don't know anything about them uh we don't know about the early theological groups the kadis for example the kadrites were the first theological group and from them came the mutazlies they were the orthodoxy back then they were the first orthodoxy of Islam so we but they don't tell you that they don't tell you that the usher system came much later even the hanbali system came later

much later and that we had this great diversity of thought and why do we constrain ourselves to one sliver of the tradition. So, and even why do we not look at non-Sni groups as well? So, look at different Shia groups, the ismileies. Um, they had some great philosophers as well. We should look at this entire tradition and value it. Um, and so that's what I tried to um promote in the course that I taught.

So, that's available on YouTube. uh and I thank the Gandhi center for uh letting me teach that course. Um so that's my interest in Islamic intellectual history and I also think that um in order to solve the problems of today we like for example issues like religion and science I didn't find the answers in the the two groups of Islamic orthodoxy today which is the usher and the hanbal instead I found the answer in ibush that's where I found the answer so I think uh you relying on all of these resources will help us deal with modernity in a much better fashion.

And then on my last point, I would say I also wanted to teach on um Islamic modernism which I think is a much maligned group. Um and so I wanted to say let's take these thinkers seriously as well in the modern period. So in the past I'm looking at these other groups like the Islamic philosophers and then all and even non-orthodox Sufis and then and non-sni groups and then in the present I'm looking at Islamic modernists and other groups even the Ahmedis etc.

So I'm trying to expand our mind and expand what we think of as a Muslim and not view just to towards orthodoxy. You see, but people would say um the reason uh we're not teaching um who I often speak about and promote or we're not speaking about uh whether it's going to be ki or farabi or we're not going to speak about these people or whatever is because these people are they are misgu guided and upon dalala

upon misguidance and if um if we start promoting them people will become misguided this is the the kind of response given when you I mean what what do you what do you think of that what do you make of that because that's the response usually given isn't it yeah well I would say sarcastically and ironically I would say I would want people then to be misguided if [laughter] if if if being on guidance is following what the traditionalists and quote unquote orthodoxy is doing today.