Recordings › Do I have to wear my trousers above my ankles? | Mufti Abu Layth · 20 Mar 2015 › Segment 1 of 1
Do I have to wear my trousers above my ankles?
salah salaah namaz prayer salaat namaaz as-salah al-salah salawat hadeeth ahadith ahaadeeth hadis hadees ahaadith saheeh sahih hadith saheeh hadith sound hadith authentic ibn abi zayd al-qayrawani ibn abi zaid qayrawani al-risalah author al-qayrawani ibn abi zaid al-qayrawani imam bukhari sahih bukhari saheeh al-bukhari saheeh bukhari imam al-bukhari imaam imams prayer leader shari'ah shariat sharee'ah maaliki malikite malikiyyah maqasid al-shariah maqasid al-sharia maqaasid maqasid ash-shariah aims of the law muftis hukm ahkam hukum hukam ahkaam haraam forbidden makrooh makruh tahrimi makruh tanzihi disliked mubah mubaah dalil daleel adillah adilla proof qiyamah qiyama qiyamat yawm al-qiyamah yawm al-qiyama resurrection madinah madina al-madinah madeenah yathrib al-risalah risala ar-risalah risalah of ibn abi zayd ulama ulamaa alhamdulillah alhamdulilah al-hamdu lillah alhumdulillah alhamdulillaah bismillah ir-rahman ir-rahim bismillahir rahmanir rahim bismillahi bismillah al-rahman al-rahim as-salamu alaykum assalamu alaikum assalamualaikum salaam salaams salam alaykum wa alaykum as-salam peace greeting niyyah niyah niyat niyya niyyatIsbal: is it haram for men to wear trousers or garments below the ankles?
Watch the answer
Open on YouTube at 1:18The player starts at 1:18, where the answer begins.
This segment0:00 to 12:57 · 12 min 57 sGeneral teaching
The answer in brief
machinesummary, machine-writtenNo: for men, wearing the garment below the ankles is not haram unless it is done out of arrogance, in which case the hadith apply; otherwise it is at most makruh. In today's societies covering the ankles is normal and carries no arrogance, so insisting on it misses the purpose of the ruling.
In more detail
After the opening formula Mufti Abu Layth takes up the question of isbal, letting a garment, whether trousers, jeans, a thawb or shalwar kameez, hang below the ankles, which he explains is why some men fold up their trousers before praying. His answer is that it is not haram unless done with arrogance or to display pride; at most it may be makruh, which in the Maliki school is a category within the permissible rather than a near-haram one. He reviews the hadith: in several wordings the Prophet says that whoever drags his izar or thawb will not be looked at by Allah on the Day of Judgement or is in the Fire, and he notes that every narration carries the qualification 'out of arrogance' (khuyala or batar), which is the cause of the prohibition. He recounts that Abu Bakr's izar would slip below his ankles because he was slim, and that the Prophet told him he was not among those who do it out of arrogance, a report he says is in Sahih al-Bukhari. He cites Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani's Risalah, which forbids dragging the garment out of arrogance, and its commentators who conclude that without arrogance it is permissible; Ibn Abd al-Barr, who says all the narrations are restricted by the arrogance clause; al-Nawawi, who calls it haram with arrogance and otherwise makruh; and Ibn Taymiyya in his Sharh al-Umda, who records that most scholars make the element of pride decisive even though he himself leans to prohibition. He closes with the context of the present day: covering the ankles is normal and the opposite attracts unwarranted attention, so insisting on it is contrary to the maqasid of the ruling and shows a lack of understanding; if the hadith applies to anyone today, he suggests, it is to those who let their trousers sag, not to those whose ankles are covered.
Question as read aloud · questioner not identifiedIs isbal, wearing trousers or a garment so that it hangs below the ankles, haram for men?
- Some terms in this segment are uncertain
Position stated
Mufti Abu Layth holds that a man letting his garment hang below the ankles is not haram unless it is done out of arrogance and is at most makruh otherwise, adding that in present-day societies covering the ankles is normal and is not a sign of arrogance.
“so that's once again in summary it is permissible as long as it is not done with an intention of arrogance which once again in our societies seldom exists”
Category: ruling
Kind: general teachingTranscript
machine0:00 to 12:57 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
bismillah r-rahman r-rahim in al hamdulillah were covered for salat wa salam o allah rasool allah mustafa well I got a buddy lady notable among beholder method ah Bobby Arthur and Medina too far apart salam wa alaikum warahmatullah wabarakatuh along certain become on marhaban we're going to take a look at a question today on is Val and that is to to wear and it's especially for men it's about wearing the trousers
below the ankles as in they allow it to hang below so you've got you don't have your ankles uncovered whether you are wearing a trouser some trousers jeans or whether you are wearing some form of fob an Arabic type of dress or whether you're wearing something like shalwar kameez or whatever you have on if you allow the government to have covered your uncle's and hang below this is called is bad in Arabic I mean the verb s bella you speedo for what must be okay
and the same name it a little thought now the thing is is this Haram so to those of you who don't know this you it might explain the concept that when you've seen some people before they praise Allah they kind of fold up the their trousers or things like this and you may have wondered why are they doing that well it's in line with this thought that is Val is Haram we have their certain a hadith that speak on this and actually condemn this so this is why the question well first of all the answer
is that if it is not done with arrogance if it's not done as almost to demonstrate pride then in that case it is not how okay it may be or it may just be permissible and if it is Makarov we're talking about not a Haram category as some people categorize it Howell we're talking the Malika don't usually categorize things morrow as a harmless at macro which is still part of the permissible okay so just to kind of clarify and then I'll go
into this slightly that it is not Hara so you may way your your garments below or to cover the ankles for men and that is not Haram provided it is not done in a sentence of arrogance now let's take a look at some of the a hadith now they are some hadith where the Prophet Allah Islam has mentioned that he said man jabra Thorburn o in some narrations it says is our that whosoever drags is whether is our is the
type of I mean what they wore the Arabs were beneath in general they call that is a it's like a sarong and what the oh it could have been the long thoughts the jalabiya whatever you you want to call it today nowadays whether you want to call it chill verb or atho bow that is was the common dress of the Arabs back then and so the Prophet Allison mentions about who so if it drags a thobe or an either that in these different narrations but they are all quite similar that in some profs allowed the proselytes and says layer young
thought along alayhi Oman p.m. that Allah will not look at that person on the day of judgment in another word version it mentions that whoever does that and it says man John Rother bahu yella or butter on that whoever does this out of as I mentioned out of quail ax of pride or arrogance that Allah will not look at a person like that or that is in the Hellfire as it as he appears in some of the wordings so as you can see all of these are quite harsh a lot of these are
heavy are quite harsh and therefore it's led to this this issue that how can you allow anybody to wear the garment beneath any man to wear they got beneath the ankle when the hadith is so clear in condemning such things you see the answer is quite clear actually that every single narration mentions with it who yella or butterin or it mentions these things okay so the fact that
and they mean out of arrogance or pride or kind of looking down on other people these are the reasons these are the elements of terrain these things have caused it to be Hara okay now if that was not the it would not be Haram and you see there is a hadith we a worker or the law on he would often um his garment would kind of hang below
sometimes below the below the ankles and once or twice it was mentioned in front of the prophecy alum and he says he says in Nazari yes I mean I had a chef a that because at the time he was incredibly slim and the way he would tie the Azhar that it would kind of lower down to be below the ankles even though he would raise it sometimes but it would still Ultima I mean it would just naturally kind of
just guide down time to time so he complains about that to the process Ellison I'm saying that look because the hadith is so strong that this is what happens and the prophet sallallaahu Salim said to him in a hadith that less than me no okay and this is I mean it's it's transmitted it's in Sahil Bihari and it's transmitted in other books as well the processor item said say to him that a worker you are not from amongst oh okay and here the question arises that when
you're saying amongst them who are we talking about and we're talking about those people who are of that category that do that in with pride and pride here I mean by that a negative sense I don't mean because pride can also it's a neutral word in English I mean in fact it's more positive at times but in Arabic determine arrogance so in that arrogant sense of pride that's what the proselytism was talking about and this is where many ala ma have spoken clearly on it you have people like hypnotized Adel kata wani who is
known as young Malik in his race Allah where he says well I adore Roger is there a whole bottle on that a person should not kind of drag his garment out of arrogance well I thought bellman and clear that and aura of this type of pride this is really a corny little campaign and let it be to the the ankles as in above and that is better for the cloth and so on and then he says and he says that this the way he's kind of he's written it out mentioning he emphasizes he has written
the term Lee oil add oh butter and this is where a lot of the commentators have elaborated by saying that he thought the unknown year Jews live Raja lineage or atho Behar Amidala me except Italica Kiran Hodgman that if a person wasn't doing it out of this sense of arrogance that what we find is that it is permissible in that case and this is what many of the Illuma have mentioned especially within the man he met abused find it not the Bob he also went comment on that mentions that all of the rewires
they mentioned wheeler or both or things like this none of them or without that therefore we restrict this hadith to that understanding and similar similarly an imam and nowhere we mentioned very similar thing he says that yeah harem that it is haram lil hi Ella otherwise were you Cara Lee radial Allah otherwise it may just be mackerel okay so this is what you're seeing from a variety of of scholars on the matter
and and you have even a transmission from even it's a me and he shot her lambda he mentions where you could all is well armies from Navajo miss Bella Widow as well so are we world is our own a moment either can ala which in Louella and he then obviously goes into mentioning the motto fatima atonement as having a la jolla raha or sera have a doe-eyed min en Italica haram and then he says that a lot of them have said this and they mean by that to be Haram and he takes that stance that that is what it will be
although some of the ulema amongst them then say that look this the key the key point here is the element of keyboard and that is what as I mentioned many of the Ottoman like it not the bar and have it in modulus I learn and many of these orlimar explain this happy to be so with that people I hope that makes sense you are allowed to do that the question is really ties into context in our day and age it is not a sign of arrogance to have your garment cover
your ankle in fact it is seen as quite normal it the opposite the contrary to that would be seen as very weird in many places it would be seen as odd and it would attract unwarranted attention therefore it would be contrary to the MA acid the objectives of that ruling
anything I would say sometimes we see people who are so harsh about these rulings but I mean I've already mentioned with evidence and the ala man that I've said it whether it's in a Hydra whether it's I've mentioned for even after bar or a lottery and all and all of these other older man that I've spoken on on the matter now so that's quite clear however I in light of the the harshness that we see sometimes from people in condemning this in our societies where it's absolutely normal and it's seen as abnormal not to be doing it really is is almost it's it's
an underside ralien and it's it just shows an absence of understanding and comprehension when it comes to the mikasa of the sharia if anything I would say that this ruling in our society is better suited for people who seem to hang their trousers down below as in they they let it drop they don't tie them up properly and let it kind of drop below and I'm sure you've all seen this phenomenon if anything that is where they should really focus refocus the this understanding of the heavy as opposed to
the uncovering of the ankles so okay so that's once again in summary it is permissible as long as it is not done with an intention of arrogance which once again in our societies seldom exists - Zack Millar played with Salam alaikum warahmatullah - Hannah Burkett
Paragraphs overlapping 0:00 to 12:57. Full text on the recording page.
Cite this segment
Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2015-03-20-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/awbo9rhpvpu/s/1/ (accessed 1 November 2026)
- APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2015, March 20). Do I have to wear my trousers above my ankles? [Video, segment 2015-03-20-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/awbo9rhpvpu/s/1/
- Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2015. "Do I have to wear my trousers above my ankles?" Video, segment 2015-03-20-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded March 20, 2015. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/awbo9rhpvpu/s/1/
- BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2015-03-20-S01, author = {Mufti Abu Layth}, title = {{Do I have to wear my trousers above my ankles?}}, year = {2015}, month = {3}, date = {2015-03-20}, howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/awbo9rhpvpu/s/1/}}, url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/awbo9rhpvpu/s/1/}, organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive}, urldate = {2026-11-01}, note = {Segment 2015-03-20-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors} }
Something wrong here?
Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.
Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.
No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.