Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Recordings › Reply to Sunni (Wahhabi) Defence Pt.I -Mufti Abu Layth · 21 Feb 2018 › Segment 2 of 11

machine

Why does he reject the hadith of the tree crying for the Prophet?

hadeeth ahadith ahaadeeth hadis hadees ahaadith muftis makruh makrooh makruh tahrimi makruh tanzihi iman imaan eemaan eeman sihr sihar jadu jadoo kala jadu sorcery ahl al-sunnah ahl as-sunnah ahlus sunnah ahl al-sunna sunnis shiah shiite shi'i twelver ithna ashari deen al-din ad-deen ad-din

The two points of the original video: one set of standards for every religion

LessonRecorded 21 Feb 2018Responding to RefutationsSegment 2 of 11 in the recording2018-02-21-S02

Play from 5:12 The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.

Watch this part

Open on YouTube at 5:12

The player starts at 5:12, the beginning of this part.

This segment3:54 to 7:50 · 3 min 56 sGeneral teaching

What this part covers

machinesummary, machine-written

The religion is built on reason, so one standard must apply to all religions: a tree that reasons and cries cannot be accepted while other faiths' claims are called absurd. He also urged his critics to reject the demeaning reports about the Prophet, which they instead affirmed.

In more detail

Mufti Abu Layth recalls the two key points of the video under attack. The first was why the crying-tree narration is problematic. The second was a challenge to those who called him disrespectful: since they claim to love the Prophet, he urged them to reject the teachings circulated by Muslims that the Prophet became clumsy under a magic spell, that he was sexually impotent, that he married and had relations with a child, that he ordered the execution of people he disliked, and that Moses ran around naked. He says the critics attacked his first point and affirmed all of these teachings, which he will come to. He then explains why he calls the teaching problematic even before the chains: the religion is built on reason, and one cannot call a god with an elephant's head or the Trinity absurd while accepting that a tree reasoned, understood and cried. He says one must apply a single set of standards and put Islam to the same test, otherwise one is creating a fairy-tale religion, and that only after this did he problematise the chains.

Position stated

correctedChecked by two independent reviews, not by the channel

Mufti Abu Layth holds that the religion is built on reason, so a Muslim must apply one set of standards: a report that a tree reasoned and cried cannot be accepted while the claims of other religions are rejected as absurd.

In his words

“you must have one set of standards and you must put Islam to that test as well then you are true in your faith”

Category: method

Report an error

Kind: general teaching

Transcript

machine3:54 to 7:50 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
3:48

this out there people right so this why have I in that video I made two key points okay the first one was to do with why this hadith is problematic this inside this narration this narrative is problematic and I go into some details and I mentioned why this is problematic and then I mentioned that people who are saying to me that I'm being disrespectful right are they I challenge and urge and beg these people since they claim to love the profit to

4:28

decry debunk and reject these teachings that are being pushed by Muslims about the Prophet saying things that the Prophet became clumsy because he had a magic spell done on him the Prophet became sexually impotent the Prophet married a child and had sexual relationship with a child that the Prophet a commanded the execution of people he didn't like and that the prophet Moses run around naked so people could see his testicles I said I beg you to reject and refute these teachings and

5:06

what do they do these idiots right all they do is they come on criticize my first point and affirm all of these teachings right so I'm gonna come to this now gradually so let's get into their criticism what they've raised about me so why did I just to make you understand why did I say this teaching is problematic okay before we even look at the asan eat which I demonstrated that as I need on this or problematic

5:45

about the tree crying and stuff like this but why is this an issue because this deem is built on reason when you start accepting unreasonable things then you have to be consistent you have to be consistent when I ask you why is Hinduism inaccurate why is it wrong why is a God with an elephant's head absurd why is it absurd you can't say because

6:24

that's dumb and doesn't make any sense and this this this but then it's okay for trees to talk and laugh and cry because both of these things make no sense in the real world you see you can't have one and you can't be very critical when it comes to other religions but have double standards when it comes to your own you must have one set of standards and you must put Islam to that test as well then you are true in your faith right so because otherwise you just when you're

7:03

speaking to Christians why are you saying oh these three gods and one makes no sense why does it make no sense because oh but it doesn't add up oh but what a tree crying adds up so why is it you can accept things but you can't accept things there so my point is that look have one set of standards I'm sorry but this you know that the fact that the tree had it could reason it could understand what was going on it could cry it could do these things it doesn't add this is a fairy tale kind of

7:40

religion that you're creating and then I said okay put that aside now let's look at the chains and I problematize the chains and shown that they have problems to them so so anyway the this channel called the Sunni defense right the Sunni defense channel who are a channel dedicating to dedicated to refuting the Shia they decided to suspend their day job of refuting the Shia and focus on me

Paragraphs overlapping 3:54 to 7:50. Full text on the recording page.

Cite this segment

Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.

Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2018-02-21-S02, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/8u9-aslyrze/s/2/ (accessed 1 November 2026)

APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2018, February 21). Why does he reject the hadith of the tree crying for the Prophet? [Video, segment 2018-02-21-S02, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/8u9-aslyrze/s/2/
Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2018. "Why does he reject the hadith of the tree crying for the Prophet?" Video, segment 2018-02-21-S02, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded February 21, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/8u9-aslyrze/s/2/
BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2018-02-21-S02,
  author = {Mufti Abu Layth},
  title = {{Why does he reject the hadith of the tree crying for the Prophet?}},
  year = {2018},
  month = {2},
  date = {2018-02-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/8u9-aslyrze/s/2/}},
  url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/8u9-aslyrze/s/2/},
  organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive},
  urldate = {2026-11-01},
  note = {Segment 2018-02-21-S02, auto-transcribed, may contain errors}
}
Something wrong here?

Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.

Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.

No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.