Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta

Recordings › On the David Wood and Muhammad Hijab Debate: Reflections & Review -Mufti Abu Layth · 24 Dec 2018 › Segment 1 of 9

machine

Who won the David Wood versus Mohammed Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity?

muftis tawheed tauheed touheed hijaab hejab hijabi

Introduction: the Wood versus Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity, and who won

LessonRecorded 24 Dec 2018From the Mind of a MuftiSegment 1 of 9 in the recording2018-12-24b-S01

Play from 0:00 The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.

Watch this part

Open on YouTube at 0:00

The player starts at 0:00, the beginning of this part.

This segment0:00 to 2:38 · 2 min 38 sGeneral teaching

What this part covers

machinesummary, machine-written

Mufti Abu Layth calls the Wood versus Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity monumental and worth watching, and says Mohammed Hijab clearly won. He introduces David Wood as an evangelical, anti-Islam preacher who has debated many Muslims.

In more detail

Mufti Abu Layth introduces the debate between David Wood and Mohammed Hijab, which he calls monumental and says will go down as a key debate; at just under three hours it is lengthy, but he watched the whole thing and found it entertaining and worth watching, in parts if necessary. He asks whether viewers know anything about David Wood, mentions an account that Wood once tried to kill his father, which he says is one version he is not sure of, and describes him as an evangelical Christian preacher whose material is Islamophobic and anti-Islam, who has debated many Muslims including Shabir Ally and has a channel with a large following. The debate's topic was Tawhid versus the Trinity. His verdict is that it is very clear Mohammed Hijab won hands down, with no two ways about it, and he says he will go through some of the points and then give his thoughts on what was being debated.

Position stated

Not yet double-checked

A summary of the view expressed is published here only after a second, independent review has found the sentence in the transcript where he says it. Until then, the transcript and the recording speak for themselves.

Kind: general teaching

Transcript

machine0:00 to 2:38 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
0:00

this debate people david wood versus muhammad hijab I don't know if you guys have watched this debate if you haven't watched it I I think you should watch it because it is in my understanding and monumental debate it will definitely go down as a as a key kind of debate that took place that's my understanding I don't know I do think it's definitely worth watching it is quite lengthy it is I think just under three hours now but you can watch him in parts I did go

0:38

through the whole thing it's very entertaining to watch now right David would do you guys know anything about him by the way you know anything about father say you tried to kill his father did he tries to kill his father his father tried to kill him this this despot to his startup at least here so okay shall we get one version that was

1:11

the neighbor I don't know it could be that because he he's definitely he's he's like one of these kind of event jelly kind of Christians who goes out he he does a lot of preaching but a lot of his that way if we can use the term that one is quite Islamophobic and it is very anti Islam so he does kind of take the mick out of Islam quite a bit I haven't actually watched too many of these things to be honest with you I think I've just maybe just a few clips

1:49

that's all I've seen but he he has had many debates with people like dr. Shapiro Ali he's debated other Muslims many Muslims they are on the debates are on YouTube and he has this kind of channel with a large number of followers to be fair so this debate was on though he'd versus the Trinity so what are my thoughts on me the debate I do I think those of you that haven't watched it it's very clear that Muhammad hijab won that debate hands down there's

2:27

no two ways about that and and I'd like to go through some of that points but then I want to discuss my thoughts on some of the the kind of what was being debated as well so the topic that they chose montt though he'd versus the Trinity to be fair one of them is reason based that is though he the oneness of God is is quite it's very much not quite it is very much in line with reason the Trinity by default is what the

Paragraphs overlapping 0:00 to 2:38. Full text on the recording page.

Cite this segment

Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.

Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2018-12-24b-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/gyrfzzzca8g/s/1/ (accessed 1 November 2026)

APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2018, December 24). Who won the David Wood versus Mohammed Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity? [Video, segment 2018-12-24b-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/gyrfzzzca8g/s/1/
Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2018. "Who won the David Wood versus Mohammed Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity?" Video, segment 2018-12-24b-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded December 24, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/gyrfzzzca8g/s/1/
BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2018-12-24b-S01,
  author = {Mufti Abu Layth},
  title = {{Who won the David Wood versus Mohammed Hijab debate on Tawhid and the Trinity?}},
  year = {2018},
  month = {12},
  date = {2018-12-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/gyrfzzzca8g/s/1/}},
  url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/gyrfzzzca8g/s/1/},
  organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive},
  urldate = {2026-11-01},
  note = {Segment 2018-12-24b-S01, auto-transcribed, may contain errors}
}
Something wrong here?

Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.

Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.

No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.