Recordings › A Reply to Sheikh Yasir Qadhi - Mufti Abu Layth · 20 Oct 2018 › Segment 13 of 15
Is a new interpretation of the Quran the same as claiming to be a new prophet?
hadeeth ahadith ahaadeeth hadis ahaadith madhab mazhab school of law madhahib mazahib madhaahib muftis jahannam jahanam jahannum koran quraan al-quran ayah aya ayat ayaat aayah aayat salafism wahhabi wahabi wahhabismPoint three: a new interpretation is not a claim to prophethood; the Salafis' own anthropomorphism
Play from 1:19:53
The video loads from YouTube only when you press play. Click a time in the transcript to seek.
Watch this part
Open on YouTube at 1:19:53The player starts at 1:19:53, the beginning of this part.
This segment1:19:53 to 1:23:42 · 3 min 49 sGeneral teaching
What this part covers
machinesummary, machine-writtenEquating a new interpretation with a claim to prophethood is out of order, since the Salafi movement itself is a radical reinterpretation that rejects the majority and holds that God has a leg and a foot. The majority of Muslims have always accepted metaphor in the Quran.
In more detail
Mufti Abu Layth says Qadhi's third point, that any radical new interpretation amounts to declaring oneself a new prophet, is out of order and too big a label: the Salafi movement is itself a radical reinterpretation, and Qadhi's own email proposing to shun the previous schools and start afresh would make him a prophet by that standard. He says one may tell people one disagrees or prefers the majority, but notes the irony that the Salafis, when ordinary Muslims ask why they do not follow a madhhab, answer the same report Qadhi used, that the hand of Allah is with the congregation, by saying the congregation can be one person. He adds, trying not to be rude, that Salafis believe God has one leg and one foot without knowing what they look like, a belief the majority of Muslims have never held, and asks why that is not a radical departure from the majority. He says the Quran is full of non-literal usage, that the majority of Muslims have always accepted metaphor in it, and that verses about the hand, foot and eyes of Allah are not taken literally by most Muslims.
Position stated
Mufti Abu Layth says that equating a new interpretation with a claim to prophethood is out of order, that the Salafi movement is itself a radical reinterpretation which rejects the majority and attributes a leg and a foot to God, and that the majority of Muslims have always accepted non-literal usage in the Quran.
“what do you mean declare yourself a new prophet how is not the Salafi movement a radical reinterpretation”
Category: teaching
Kind: general teachingTranscript
machine1:19:53 to 1:23:42 · click a time to seek · dotted terms open the glossary
don't think he's done things like that but I don't think that was aimed at me anyway but perhaps I thought I'll just mention that anyway so qualifications are definitely there so that's not true and why don't we have a talk if you're very confident since you said I'm more than confident about the science of hadith and as to the third point of radical reinterpretations that meant anything new is tantamount to declaring yourself a new prophet car these are bars either you behave you know this one
what do you mean declare yourself a new prophet how is not the Salafi movement a radical reinterpretation do you declare yourself a prophet for being radically a moment when I read your message saying look we should shun all the previous schools and come up with a new interpretation from you what you had announced was was that you declaring yourself to be a prophet this one big problem this label too big you know this trying to say declare yourself being a
prophet come on come on behave so god this up that one was that's a bit too much that really it's on they don't do much so we can't declare so i think these kind of things are out of order however you can look you can say to people look I think you know I disagree with you or I want to stick with the majority and like he said that hadith is yet Elijah MA the irony is all of the selfies are presented with these exact same idea on why they should follow methods and
that's the irony all you have to do is read their own responses to normal Muslims on why they don't follow methods and they say yet Allah Hema aljahmeir but the Jamaa are can be one person this is the Celebes you come up with this that we don't need to follow the majority one person can be the majority this is what they say so why is it that these things aren't looking at either look what selfies believe I'm not trying to be rude but look in all honesty you can ask F yourself Bobby they believe that God has one leg old selfies believe
God has one leg and one foot not making this up they say yeah we don't know what his leg looks like sorry that's just my laughter coming out these are not nice B hey Musti behave let me just have a word with myself right okay but in all honesty in all seriousness they do believe God has one leg you can ask yourself Cardenas he'll tell you yeah we believe God has one leg in one foot but we just don't know what that forty's and
we don't know what that leg is and we don't know what it looks like or and you think well what on earth are you on about that majority the Muslims have never believed stuff like this is this not a radical you know are you not why don't you follow the majority the Gemara the Gemara and the quran has is full of only from usage as well to say there's no non-literal usage in the quran of course there is the the Hadees have always argued the majority the Muslims have accepted metaphor in the Quran Allah uses metaphor on several occasions in the Quran I've quoted like the verses the whole wanting to fall down how does
the world want the verse is to do with Allah most of the Muslims do not take these things like Allah has one foot in one leg and what is it hands and this and that and multiple eyes and these verses that are mentioned in the Quran most Muslims accept them just as non-literal usage like just these are just like idiomatic usage of language to reflect power and Majesty in the Quran and stuff like that so all right so I hope these things make some sense my battery is kind of coming to an end people look that's how much passion and
Paragraphs overlapping 1:19:53 to 1:23:42. Full text on the recording page.
Cite this segment
Stable id, transcript version and tier are part of the citation. Every change to a transcript is logged.Mufti Abu Layth Archive, segment 2018-10-20-S13, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/7cylt19gx5k/s/13/ (accessed 1 November 2026)
- APA 7
Mufti Abu Layth. (2018, October 20). Is a new interpretation of the Quran the same as claiming to be a new prophet? [Video, segment 2018-10-20-S13, auto-transcribed, may contain errors]. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Retrieved November 1, 2026, from https://muftiabulayth.org/r/7cylt19gx5k/s/13/
- Chicago author-date
Mufti Abu Layth. 2018. "Is a new interpretation of the Quran the same as claiming to be a new prophet?" Video, segment 2018-10-20-S13, auto-transcribed, may contain errors. Mufti Abu Layth Archive. Recorded October 20, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2026. https://muftiabulayth.org/r/7cylt19gx5k/s/13/
- BibTeX
@misc{abulayth-2018-10-20-S13, author = {Mufti Abu Layth}, title = {{Is a new interpretation of the Quran the same as claiming to be a new prophet?}}, year = {2018}, month = {10}, date = {2018-10-20}, howpublished = {\url{https://muftiabulayth.org/r/7cylt19gx5k/s/13/}}, url = {https://muftiabulayth.org/r/7cylt19gx5k/s/13/}, organization = {Mufti Abu Layth Archive}, urldate = {2026-11-01}, note = {Segment 2018-10-20-S13, auto-transcribed, may contain errors} }
Something wrong here?
Tell us what is wrong and it will be checked against the recording. Nothing changes until a person has reviewed it.
Sending a note needs JavaScript, which is off or unavailable in this browser. Nothing has been sent.
No name, email address or account is asked for or stored, and the inbox does not store your IP address. For rate limiting it keeps an unreadable fingerprint of your connection for 48 hours, and our database provider's own logs record connections as every website's do. Only your note, its kind, the page and the moment in the recording are kept, for review.