Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta
Subscribe on YouTube Support on Patreon

Sources and names › Term › mursal

Term

mursal

Cited in 7 segments across 4 recordings · 2018 to 2022 · term/term:mursal

Citing segments

Newest first. Each opens the whole segment, not a bare quote.
19 Aug 2022video Why did Ibn Hajar say the satanic verses story has some basis? Mufti Abu Layth says Ibn Hajar wrongly argued that the many weak chains give the story a basis, and attributes the mistake to passion for the hadith project rather than malice. Lessonposition checkedIbn Hajar al-AsqalaniFath al-BariIbn al-SalahQadi Iyad machine7 min 49 s1:18:40on YouTube
19 Aug 2022video Recap: the novel, insult versus critique, and the false story summarised Mufti Abu Layth recaps that Rushdie's novel was an insult rather than a critique and that the satanic verses story is a fabrication rejected by al-Tabari, Ibn Khuzayma and Qadi Iyad, recommending al-Shifa and al-Albani's book. LessonSalman RushdieIbn Rushd (Averroes)The Satanic Verses (novel)Quran 22:52 (Satan cast into the prophet's wish, then God annulled it) machine6 min 09 s1:52:45on YouTube
14 Mar 2021video Why does Mufti Abu Layth say the Bukhari chain for Jesus's descent is unreliable? The first Bukhari chain leaves two narrators' names ambiguous, a practice al-Dhahabi and Ibn Hajar record of al-Bukhari, and passes through al-Zuhri, whom the critics describe as inserting his own words into reports and making mursal reports reach the Prophet. Lessonposition checkedreport: yanzilu fikum ibn maryam hakaman adlanreport: the prophet tried to end his life on several occasionsSahih al-Bukharial-Bukhari machine9 min 18 s1:35:56on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is the hadith in Bukhari about Jesus coming down reliable? The first Bukhari chain is doubtful: al-Bukhari left two narrators unnamed, which he is known to have done deliberately, and the chain runs through al-Zuhri, who was known to insert his own words into hadith. Lessonposition checkedYasir Qadhireport: yanzilu fikum ibn maryam hakaman adlanSahih al-Bukharial-Bukhari machine9 min 33 s2:38:55on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is there a single hadith on Jesus's return with a flawless chain? Every chain he examined among the strongest Bukhari and Muslim reports, including that of al-Nawwas ibn Sam'an, has a criticised narrator, so Qadhi's 'no doubt' fails; preferring al-Bukhari over equal critics is arbitrary. Lessonposition checkedYasir Qadhial-Nawwas ibn Sam'anSahih MuslimSahih al-Bukhari machine5 min 49 s3:00:24on YouTube
2 Mar 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth Is the hadith of Aisha about Jesus and the Dajjal reliable? The Aisha report rests on one transmitter who dictated tens of thousands of hadith from memory in Isbahan, and only his version has the Dajjal emerge from the Jews of Isbahan, which Mufti Abu Layth finds suspicious. Lessonposition checkedAishareport: the dajjal emerges from the jews of isbahan (aisha)report: if the dajjal comes while i am among you i will contend with him on your behalfAbu Dawud al-Tayalisi [?] machine4 min 29 s3:06:13on YouTube
2 Jan 2018Responding to Refutations Anal intercourse: the difference of opinion and the chains of the critic's hadith On anal intercourse Mufti Abu Layth says only that there is a difference of opinion: the majority held it haram, many Malikis did not and disliked it for hygiene. He argues that every hadith the critic quoted against it has a weak or disconnected chain. Lessonquoted view, not his positionAbu Ibraheem HusnaynSufyan al-ThawriQadi IyadAbu Muhammad al-Asili [?] machine11 min 53 s24:50on YouTube