Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta
Subscribe on YouTube Support on Patreon

Sources and names › Book › Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers)

Book

Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers)

Cited in 2 segments across 2 recordings · 2020 to 2021 · book/book:tahafut-al-falasifa

Citing segments

Newest first. Each opens the whole segment, not a bare quote.
19 Jan 2021Monday Nights with Mufti Abu Layth How did Ibn Rushd answer al-Ghazali's attack on the philosophers? Mufti Abu Layth explains that Ibn Rushd answered al-Ghazali by showing that what he refuted was mostly neoplatonism, not Aristotle. Lessonposition checkedal-GhazaliIbn Rushd (Averroes)Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers)Tahafut al-Tahafut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) machine3 min 52 s2:16:37on YouTube
11 Dec 2020MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth Are paradise and hell in the Quran meant literally? The guest, following Ibn Rushd against al-Ghazali, says belief requires accepting the afterlife, not literal readings of its details; Mufti Abu Layth agrees the afterlife is symbolic but says the prophets' stories are of this world. Discussionguest speechDr Javad T. Hashmi (guest)al-GhazaliTahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers)Ibn Rushd (Averroes) machine4 min 28 s1:15:55on YouTube