Early version. Transcripts and tags are labelled by accuracy tier. A position is shown only after two independent reviews have found it in his own words.
Mufti Abu Layth ArchiveBeta
Subscribe on YouTube Support on Patreon

Sources and names › Scholar › Asma Hilali

Scholar

Asma Hilali

Cited in 3 segments across 1 recording · 2019 · scholar/scholar:asma-hilali

Citing segments

Newest first. Each opens the whole segment, not a bare quote.
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Who has studied the Sana'a palimpsest and what is the controversy about? The Sana'a manuscript is a palimpsest studied by the Puins, Asma Hilali, Sadeghi and Goudarzi, and people online have used it to claim that the Quran Muslims have is not the original. Mufti Abu Layth sets out to answer that claim. Lessonpalimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest)Gerd Puin [?]Elisabeth Puin [?]Asma Hilali machine2 min 37 s5:10on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Does the Sana'a manuscript show that the Quran was changed? The Sana'a manuscript and others such as the Birmingham manuscript date to the first century of Islam, when the Quran was the one text Muslims documented and taught everywhere. The Quran was too widespread and too distinctive in style to corrupt profitably, which is why fabrication targeted hadith instead. Lessonposition checkedElisabeth Puin [?]Behnam Sadeghi [?]Mohsen Goudarzi [?]Asma Hilali machine5 min 15 s7:47on YouTube
1 Mar 2019Ponderings on the Holy Quran Was the Sana'a palimpsest an official copy of the Quran or someone's personal notes? The lower text contains notes such as 'do not say bismillah here' before Surat al-Tawba, which shows it was someone's personal script, as Asma Hilali argues, and not a standard copy sent out to communities. Mufti Abu Layth finds no evidence for the Puins' view that it was official. Lessonposition checkedAsma HilaliGerd Puin [?]palimpsest (the Sana'a palimpsest) machine2 min 33 s19:34on YouTube