Sources and names › Scholar › Ibrahim ibn Ma'qil al-Nasafi [?]
ScholarIbrahim ibn Ma'qil al-Nasafi [?]
Cited in 3 segments across 2 recordings · 2018 to 2021 · scholar/scholar:ibrahim-ibn-maqil-al-nasafi
Citing segments
Newest first. Each opens the whole segment, not a bare quote.
29 Jan 2021MindTrap with Mufti Abu Layth
Why do Hanafis defend Sahih al-Bukhari when their school differs from it?
Mufti Abu Layth says Bukhari has question marks and is not the gold standard; the guest says its canonisation was an Abbasid-era Athari project, and that for Hanafis the Athar of their own imams should rank highest.
machine7 min 38 s59:28on YouTube
30 Aug 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari
Bukhari in his own chain, and the other students whose copies did not reach us
Sahih al-Bukhari reaches us through Farabri alone, although other students transmitted it. Nasafi's copy survives only in a summary of twelve hundred hadith, little of Hammad ibn Shakir's remains, Bazdawi's did not reach us, and Bukhari even appears in a chain in his own book.
machine7 min 52 s1:02:26on YouTube
30 Aug 2018BukhariGate: Issues with Sahih al-Bukhari
Ibn Hajar and Ibn Rushayd on the transmissions: Farabri alone, found copies not taught
Ibn Hajar and Ibn Rushayd both record that Farabri's is the only transmission that reached later generations through teaching. Copies found centuries later cannot be taught from, so claims of independent connected transmissions are not honest.
machine6 min 33 s1:10:18on YouTube